Ambient noise measurements following the 2011 Christchurch earthquake: Relationships with previous microzonation studies, liquefaction, and nonlinearity

Seismological Research Letters

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 919-926

  Mucciarelli, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBIENT NOISE; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; LIQUEFACTION; MEASUREMENT METHOD; NONLINEARITY; SOIL MECHANICS; ZONATION;

CANTERBURY [SOUTH ISLAND]; CHRISTCHURCH [CANTERBURY]; NEW ZEALAND; SOUTH ISLAND;

EID: 80755142958     PISSN: 08950695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.82.6.919     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Beroya, M. A. A., A. Aydin, R. Tiglao, and M. Lasala (2009). Use of microtremor in liquefaction hazard mapping. Engineering Geology 107, 140-153.
2. Bonilla, L. F., R. J. Archuleta, and D. Lavallée (2005). Histeretic and dilatant behavior of cohesionless soils and their effects on nonlinear site response: Field data observation and modeling. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95, 2,373- 2,395. (Pubitemid 43159561)
3. Bradley, B. A., and M. Cubrinovski (2011). Near-source strong ground motions observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Seismological Research Letters 82, 853-865.
4. Brown, L. J., and J. H. Weeber (1992). Geology of the Christchurch Urban Area. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Map 1, 1 sheet + 104 pp. Lower Hutt, New Zealand: GNS Science.
5. Chatelain, J.-L., B. Guillier, F. Cara, A.-M. Duval, K. Atakan, and the SESAME Working Group (2008). Evaluation of the influence of experimental conditions on H/V results from ambient noise recordings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 6 (1), 33-74. (Pubitemid 351665302)
6. Cubrinovski, M., and M. Taylor (2011). Liquefaction Map V.1.0 22 Feb. 2001 earthquake, http://db.nzsee.org.nz:8080/en/web/chch-2011/geotechnical/-/ blogs/liquefaction-map-drive-throughreconnaissance. Last accessed 19 September 2011.
7. Di Giacomo, D., M. R. Gallipoli, M. Mucciarelli, S. Parolai, and S. M. Richwalski (2005). Analysis and modeling of HVSR in the presence of a velocity inversion: The case of Venosa, Italy. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95, 2,364-2,372. (Pubitemid 43159560)
8. Nakamura, Y. (1996). Real-time information systems for hazard mitigation. In Proceedings of the 10th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, paper # 2134.
9. Parolai, S., and S. M. Richwalski (2004). The importance of converted waves in comparing H/V and RSM site response estimates. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94 (1), 304-313. (Pubitemid 38485566)
10. Puglia, R., R. Ditommaso, F. Pacor, M. Mucciarelli, L. Luzi, and M. Bianca (2011). Frequency variation in site response as observed from strong motion data of the L'Aquila, 2009 seismic sequence. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9 (3), 8 69-892; doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9266-2.
11. Smyrou, E., P. Tasiopoulou, İ. E. Bal, and G. Gazetas (2011). Ground motions versus geotechnical and structural damage in the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Seismological Research Letters 82, 882-892.
12. Stockwell, R. G., L. Mansinha, and R. P. Lowe (1996). Localization of the complex spectrum: The S transform. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 44, 998-1,001.
13. Toshinawa, T., J. J. Taber, and J. B. Berrill (1997). Distribution of ground-motion intensity inferred from questionnaire survey, earthquake recordings, and microtremor measurements-A case study in Christchurch, New Zealand, during the 1994 Arthurs Pass earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 87 (2), 356-369.