Improving transparency in dental research by making the raw data available

Journal of the Canadian Dental Association

Volumn 77, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Faggion Jr , Clovis Mariano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STANDARD;

DENTAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 80755126248     PISSN: 07098936     EISSN: 14882159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J Med Ethics. 2011;37(4):249-53. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
2. Shafer SL. Tattered threads. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(5):1361-3.
3. Faunce T, Townsend R, McEwan A. The Vioxx pharmaceutical scandal: Peterson v Merke Sharpe & Dohme (Aust) Pty Ltd (2010) 184 FCR 1. J Law Med. 2010;18(1):38-49.
4. White PF, Kehlet H, Liu S. Perioperative analgesia: what do we still know? Anesth Analg. 2009;108(5):1364-7.
5. Vickers AJ. Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials. Trials. 2006;7:15.
6. Luther F. Scientific misconduct: tip of an iceberg or the elephant in the room? J Dent Res. 2010;89(12):1364-7. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
7. Hackam DG, Redelmeier DA. Translation of research evidence from animals to humans. JAMA. 2006;296(14):1731-2 . (Pubitemid 44547792)
8. Altman DG, Cates C. Authors should make their data available. BMJ. 2001;323(7320):1069-70. (Pubitemid 33042317)
9. Hutchon DJ. Publishing raw data and real time statistical analysis on e-journals. BMJ. 2001;322(7285):530.
10. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook. org.
11. Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2457-65 (Pubitemid 38669189)
12. Als-Nielsen B, Chen W, Gluud C, Kjaergard LL. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? JAMA 2003;290(7):921-8. (Pubitemid 37430464)
13. Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, Montori VM, Schünemann H, Sprague S et al. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ. 2004;170(4):477-80. (Pubitemid 38293642)