Use of forensic investigations in anti-doping

Forensic Science International

Volumn 213, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 109-113

  Jan, Nicolas ^a   Marclay, François ^a   Schmutz, Natalie ^b   Smith, Matt ^b   Lacoste, Alain ^b   Castella, Vincent ^a   Mangin, Patrice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CENTER OF LEGAL MEDICINE   (Switzerland)

^b International Rowing Federation   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bayesian approach; Blood; DNA profiling; Doping control; Forensic science; Likelihood ratio

Indexed keywords

AMINOCAPROIC ACID; CREATINE PHOSPHATE; DNA; FRUCTOSE 1,6 BISPHOSPHATE; INOSINE;

ARTICLE; ATHLETE; CASE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DOPING; FORENSIC SCIENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INFUSION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROWING;

EID: 80655147085     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: 18726283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.037     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) The World Anti-Doping Code, Montreal 2009, (accessed April 2011). http://www.wada-ama.org/.
2. World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) List of Prohibited Substances 2011, (accessed April 2011). http://www.wada-ama.org/.
3. Esseiva P., Ioset S., Anglada F., Gaste L., Ribaux O., Margot P., Gallusser A., Biedermann A., Specht Y., Ottinger E. Forensic drug Intelligence: an important tool in law enforcement. Forensic Sci. Int. 2007, 167:247-254.
4. Castella V., Dimo-Simonin N., Brandt-Casadevall C., Mangin P. Consensus profiles and databasing of casework samples amplified with 34 PCR cycles: an empirical approach. Int. Congr. Ser. 2004, 1261:532-534.
5. Goodwin W., Linacre A., Sibte H. An Introduction to Forensic Genetics 2007, John Wiley & Sons, England, pp. 17-25.
6. Sołtyszewski I., Pepiński W., Dobrzyńska-Tarasiuk A., Janica J. DNA typeability in liquid urine and urine stains using AmpFlSTR SGM Plus. Adv. Med. Sci. 2006, 51:36-38.
7. Castella V., Dimo-Simonin N., Brandt-Casadevall C., Robinson N., Saugy M., Taroni F., Mangin P. Forensic identification of urine samples: a comparison between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers. Int. J. Legal Med. 2006, 120:67-72.
8. Junge A., Steevens M., Madea B. Successful DNA typing of urine sample in a doping control using human mitochondrial DNA analysis. J. Forensic Sci. 2002, 47:1022-1024.
9. Aitken C.G.G., Taroni F. Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists 2004, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
10. Evett I.W., Jackson G., Lambert J.A., McCrossan S. The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements. Sci. Justice 2000, 40:233-239.
11. Foreman L.A., Evett I.W. Statistical analyses to support forensic interpretation for a new 10-locus STR profiling system. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2001, 114:147-155.
12. Federal Law on Human Genetic Analyses 2004, (accessed April 2011). http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/ff/2004/5145.pdf.
13. International Rowing Federation (FISA) Rowers and Coxswains' Commitment 2007, Internal Publication.
14. Court of Arbitration for Sport, Final Decision 2010, Communiqué de Presse, (accessed April 2011). http://www.tas-cas.org/d2wfiles/document/4243/5048/0/Communiqu%E9%20de%20presse_Valverde_FINAL.pdf.
15. International Rowing Federation (FISA) FISA Executive Committee in the Matter of: The Russian Rowing Federation 2008, (accessed April 2011). http://www.worldrowing.com/medias/docs/media_354615.pdf.