Meddling in swedish success in nuclear waste management

Environmental Politics

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 246-263

  Elam, Mark ^a   Sundqvist, Gö Ran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Actornetwork theory; Fluid technology; Geological disposal; Nuclear waste management; Sweden

Indexed keywords

RADIOACTIVE WASTE; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; UNDERGROUND STORAGE; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE TECHNOLOGY;

SWEDEN;

EID: 80655140439     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2011.551030     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andersson-Skog, L., 2005. 'Från ren energi till farligt avfall - kä rnkraftsfrå gans reglering i det svenska vä lfä rdsbyggandet. En ekonomisk-historisk ö versikt'. In: M. Andrén and U. Strandberg, eds. Kärnavfallets politiska utmaningar. Stockholm: Gidlunds fö rlag.
2. Anshelm, J., 2006. Bergsäkert eller våghalsigt: Frågan om kärnavfallets hantering i det offentliga samtalet i Sverige 1950-2002. Lund: Arkiv fö rlag.
3. Blowers, A., Lowry, D., and Solomon, B., 1991. The international politics of nuclear waste. New York: St. Martin's Press.
4. Brown, S., 2002. Michel Serres: science, translation and the logic of the parasite. Theory Culture and Society, 19 (3), 1-27.
5. Callon, M., 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: J. Law, ed. Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? London: Routledge.
6. Dagens Nyheter, 2009. Kärnkraften blir kvar tills den kan ersättas. 22 March.
7. Dagens Nyheter, 2009b. Slutförvaring I Östhammar. 3 June.
8. De Laet, M. and Mol, A., 2000. The Zimbabwe bush pump: mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30 (2), 225-263.
9. Elam, M. and Sundqvist, G., 2007. Stakeholder involvement in Swedish nuclear waste management. SKI Report 2007:2. Stockholm: The Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate.
10. Elam, M. and Sundqvist, G., 2009. The Swedish KBS project: a last word in nuclear fuel safety prepares to conquer the world? Journal of Risk Research, 12 (7&8), 969-988.
11. Holmstrand, O., ed., 2001. Kärnkraftavfall. Avfallskedjans syn på den svenska hanteringen. Nä tverket Avfallskedjan. Available from: http://avfallskedjan.polarsilver.com
12. Johansson, T. and Steen, P., 1981. Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13. Kaijser, A., 1992. Redirecting power: Swedish nuclear power policies in historical perspective. Annual Review of Energy and Environment, 17, 437-462.
14. KBS, 1977. Förglasat avfall från upparbetning. I Allmän del. Stockholm: Kärnbränslesäkerhet.
15. Kjellman, S., 2000. Det svenska kärnavfallsprogrammet. Stockholm: Svensk kärnbränslehantering AB.
16. Latour, B., 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
17. Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Law, J., 2007. Actor network theory and material semiotics. On-Line Papers, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.
19. Lidskog, R., 1994. Radioactive and hazardous waste management in Sweden: movements, politics and science. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Sociologica Upsaliensia 38.
20. Lidskog, R. and Sundqvist, G., 2004. On the right track? Technology, geology and society in Swedish nuclear waste management. Journal of Risk Research, 7 (2), 251-268.
21. Nirex, 2005a. The viability of a phased geological repository concept for the long-term management of the UK's radioactive waste. Report No. N/122. UK Nirex Ltd.
22. Nirex, 2005b. Cost estimate for a reference repository concept for UK high-level waste/spent fuel. Technical Note No. 484281. UK Nirex Ltd.
23. Posiva, 2003. Nuclear waste management of the Olkiluoto and Loviisa power plants: programme for research, development and technical design for 2004-2006. TKS-2003. Olkiluoto: Posiva Oy.
24. Power, M., 1991. Auditing and environmental expertise: between protest and professionalisation, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 4 (3), 30-42.
25. Rhodes, R.A.W., 1996. The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies, XLIV, 652-667.
26. Rose, N., 1999. Powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. SFS - Svensk Författningssamling, 1977. Lag om särskilt tillstånd att tillföra kärnreaktor kärnbränsle, m.m. (Nuclear Power Stipulation Act).
28. SKB, 1986. R&D-Programme 86: handling and final disposal of nuclear waste. Programme for research, development and other measures. Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.
29. SKB, 1992a. RD&D-Programme 92: treatment and final disposal of nuclear waste. Programme for research, development, demonstration and other measures. Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.
30. SKB, 1992b. Ang. Lokalisering av ett djupförvar för Sveriges långlivade kärnavfall. 1992-10-21.Reference 56.220. Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.
31. SKB, 1995. Översiktsstudie av kommuner med kärnteknisk verksamhet. Project Report D-95-002. Stockholm: Svensk kä rnbrä nslehantering AB.
32. SKB, 2004. Utökat samråd enligt miljöbalken. Sammanställning 2004. Stockholm: Svensk kä rnbrä nslehantering AB.
33. SOU, 1976. Spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet. Sundqvist, G., 2002. The bedrock of opinion: science, technology and society in the siting of high-level nuclear waste. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
34. Svenska Dagbladet, 2007. Kärnkraften kan bli kvar till 2045.
35. Svenska Dagbladet, 2009. Charförlorat'själsfråga'anser kritiker.
36. Walker, W., 2000. Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations. Research Policy, 29, 833-846.
37. www.igdtp.eu (2009) Implementing geological disposal of radioactive waste - technology platform.