Evaluation of a group prenatal care-based curriculum in a family medicine residency

Family Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 712-717

  Barr, Wendy B ^a   Aslam, Sana ^b   Levin, Marc ^c  

^a Greater Lawrence Family Health Center   (United States)

^b LAKE ERIE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE   (United States)

^c ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80655139198     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Rising SS. Centering Pregnancy: an interdisciplinary model of empowerment. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 1998;43(1):46-54.
2. Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, et al. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110(2):330-9.
3. ® group prenatal care and childbirth education classes. Journal of Perinatal Education 2008;17(1):27-34.
4. Baldwin KA. Comparison of selected outcomes of Centering Pregnancy versus traditional prenatal care. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006;51(4):266-72.
5. Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, et al. Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: results from a matched cohort study at public clinics. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102(5, Part 1):1051-7.
6. Bennett IM, Coco A, Anderson J, et al. Improving maternal care with a continuous quality improvement strategy: a report from the Interventions to Minimize Preterm and Low Birth Weight Infants Through Continuous Improvement Techniques (IMPLICIT) Network. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22(4):380-6.
7. Kogan MD, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, Nagey DA. Relation of the content of prenatal care to the risk of low birth weight. JAMA 1994;271(17):1340-5.
8. Menacker F, Hamilton B. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS data brief, volume 35. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2010.
9. Choices in Childbirth. New York City Hospitals cesarean section rates 2000-2008. www.choicesinchildbirth.org/resources/NYCSectionRates20002008.pdf.
10. Rahnama P, Ziaei S, Faghihzadeh S. Impact of early admission in labor on method of delivery. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2006;92(3):217-20.