Algebra: A challenge at the crossroads of policy and practice

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 453-492

  Stein, Mary Kay ^a   Kaufman, Julia Heath ^b   Sherman, Milan ^c   Hillen, Amy F ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

algebra; course taking; policy; universal

Indexed keywords

EID: 80655131276     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0034654311423025     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. ACT. (2007). Rigor at risk: Reaffirming quality in the high school core curriculum. Iowa City, IA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/reports/rigor.html.
2. ACT. (2008). EPAS State of the Nation Report 2007: Mathematics. Iowa City, IA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/reports/mathematics.html.
3. AdelmanC. (1999). Answers in the toolbox. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/Toolbox/index.html.
4. AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/toolboxrevisit/index.html.
5. Allensworth E.,Nomi T.,Montgomery N.,Lee V. E. College preparatory curriculum for all: Academic consequences of requiring algebra and English I for ninth graders in Chicago.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2009;31:367-391.
6. AtandaR. (1999). Do gatekeeper courses expand education options?Education Statistics Quarterly, 1(1), 33-38. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_1/1_1/4-esq11-c.asp.
7. Balfanz R.,Legters N.,Jordan W.Catching up: Impact of talent development ninth grade instructional interventions in reading and mathematics in high-poverty high schools. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on Education of Students Placed at Risk; 2004:.
8. BrahierD. (1995, October). Mathematical dispositions of students enrolled in first-year algebra. Paper presented at the 17th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Columbus, OH. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED389590.pdf.
9. Burris C.,Heubert J. P.,Levin H. M.Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping.American Educational Research Journal. 2006;43 (1): 105-136.
10. BurrisC. C.WelnerK. G. (2005). Closing the achievement gap by detracking. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 594-598. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20441857.
11. BurrisC. C.WelnerK. G.BezozaJ. W. (2009). Universal access to a quality education: Research and recommendations for the elimination of curricular stratification. Boulder: University of Colorado Boulder, Education and the Public Interest Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/universal-access.
12. Cogan L. S.,Schmidt W. H.,Wiley D. E.Who takes what math and in which track? Using TIMSS to characterize U.S. students' eighth-grade mathematics learning opportunities.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2001;23:323-341.
13. College Board. (2000). Equity 2000: A systemic education reform model. A summary report, 1990-2000. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/association/equity/EquityHistoricalReport.pdf.
14. Edmunds J. A.,Bernstein L.,Unlu F.,Glennie E.,Willse J.,Arshavsky N. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2011New Orleans, LA; 2011.
15. EdSource. (2007). High standards + support = more students taking tougher math. Mountain View, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.edsource.org/pub_HS5-07_Math.html.
16. EdSource. (2009). Algebra policy in California: Great expectations and serious challenges. Mountain View, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.edsource.org/pub_algebra09.html.
17. EversonH. T.Dunham M. D. (1996). Signs of success-Equity 2000[R]: Preliminary evidence of effectiveness. New York, NY: College Board. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED455109.pdf.
18. Filer K. L.,Chang M.Peer and parent encouragement of early algebra enrollment and mathematics achievement.Middle Grades Research Journal. 2008;3 (1): 23-34.
19. Gamoran A.,Hannigan E. C.Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2000;22:241-254.
20. Gamoran A.,Porter A. C.,Smithson J.,White P. A.Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1997;19:325-338.
21. HamS.WalkerE. (1999). Getting to the right algebra: The EQUITY 2000 initiative in Milwaukee. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED441896.pdf.
22. HornL.BobbittL. (2000). Mapping the road to college: First-generation students' math track, planning strategies, and context of support. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://mccfact.mcc.edu/PDF%20Files/MappingRoadtoCollege.pdf.
23. Huntley M. A.,Rasmussen C. L.,Villarubi R. S.,Sangtong J.,Fey J. T.Effects of standards-based mathematics education: A study of the Core-Plus Mathematics Project algebra and functions strand.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 2000;31:328-361.
24. KaputJ. J. (1998). Transforming algebra from an engine of inequity to an engine of mathematical power by "algebraifying" the K-12 curriculum. In The nature and role of algebra in the K-14 curriculum: Proceedings of a national symposium. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED441664.pdf.
25. KempleJ. J.HerlihyC. (2004). The Talent Development High School model: Context, components, and initial impacts on ninth grade students' engagement and performance. New York, NY: MDRC. Retrieved from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/388/full.pdf.
26. KempleJ. J.HerlihyC. M.SmithT. J. (2005). Making progress toward graduation: Evidence from the Talent Development High School model. New York, NY: MDRC. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED485348.pdf.
27. KurlaenderM.ReardonS.JacksonJ. (2008). Middle school predictors of high school achievement in three California school districts. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara, Gevirtz Graduate School of Education. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/files/MiddleSchoolPredictors.pdf.
28. LovelessT. (2008). The misplaced math student: Lost in eighth-grade algebra. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Brown Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/files/rc/reports/2008/0922_education_loveless/0922_education_loveless.pdf.
29. Ma X.Does early acceleration of advanced students in mathematics pay off? An examination of mathematics participation in the senior grades.Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics. 2000;22 (1): 68-79.
30. McCoyL. P. (2005). Effect of demographic and personal variables on achievement in eighth-grade algebra. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 131-135. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27548070.
31. Moses R.The algebra initiative colloquium. Lacampagne C. B.Blair W. D.Kaput J., ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement; 1993:53-67.
32. Moses R. P.,Cobb C. E. J.Radical equations: Organizing math literacy in America's schools. Boston, MA: Beacon; 2001:.
33. NomiT. (2010, November). The unintended consequences of an algebra-for-all policy on high-skill students: The effects on instructional organization and students' academic outcomes. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management conference, Boston, MA. Retrieved from https://www.appam.org/conferences/fall/boston2010/sessions/downloads/1098.4.pdf.
34. Nomi T.,Allensworth E. M."Double-dose" algebra as an alternative strategy to remediation: Effects on students' academic outcomes.Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2009;2 (2): 111-148.
35. Nomi T.,Allensworth E.Response to intervention in mathematics. Gersten R.Newman-Gonchar R., ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; in press:.
36. Nord C.,Roey S.,Perkins R.,Lyons M.,Lemanski N.,Brown J.,Schuknecht J.The nation's report card: America's high school graduates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 2011:.
37. Nystrand M.,Gamoran A.A study of instruction as discourse. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research; 1988:.
38. Oakes J.,Ormseth T.,Bell R.,Camp P.Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 1990:.
39. Paul F. G.Grouping within Algebra I: A structural sieve with powerful effects for low-income, minority, and immigrant students.Educational Policy. 2005;19:262-282.
40. RampeyB. D.DionG. S.DonahueP. L. (2008). The nation's report card: Trends in academic progress in reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED505083.pdf.
41. SchmidtW. H. (2009). Exploring the relationship between content coverage and achievement: Unpacking the meaning of tracking in eighth grade mathematics. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://education.msu.edu/epc/forms/Schmidt_2009_Relationship_between_Content_Coverage_and_Achievement.pdf.
42. SchneiderM. (2009). Math in American high schools: The delusion of rigor. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, AEI Outlook Series. Retrieved from http://www.aei.org/outlook/100074.
43. ShakraniS. (1996). Eighth-grade algebra coursetaking and mathematics proficiency (NAEP FACTS Vol. 1, No. 2). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED396915.pdf.
44. Singh K.,Granville M.Factors that affect enrollment in eighth grade algebra for African American students.Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly. 1999;22 (2): 57-73.
45. Smith J. B.Does an extra year make any difference? The impact of early access to algebra on long-term gains in mathematics attainment.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1996;18:141-153.
46. SpielhagenF. R. (2006). Closing the achievement gap in math: The long-term effects of eighth-grade algebra. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(1), 34-39. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ753970.pdf.
47. Starkel R.,Martinez J.,Price K.Two-period algebra in the 05-06 school year: Implementation report. Chicago, IL: Chicago Public Schools Department of Program Evaluation; 2006:.
48. Stone C.Leveling the playing field: An urban school system examines equity in access to mathematics curriculum.Urban Review. 1998;30:295-307.
49. WalstonJ.McCarrollJ. (2010). Eighth-grade algebra: Findings form the eighth-grade round of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-99 (NCES-2010-016). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010016.pdf.
50. WatermanS. (2010). Pathways report: Dead ends and wrong turns on the path through algebra. Palo Alto, CA: Noyce Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.noycefdn.org/documents/Pathways_Report.pdf.
51. Welner K. G.,Burris C. C.Alternative approaches to the politics of detracking.Theory Into Practice. 2006;45 (1): 90-99.
52. WWC procedures and standards handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2008:.
53. WilliamsT.HaertelE.KirstM. W.LevinJ.RosinM.PerryM.WebmanB. (2011). Improving middle grades math performance: A closer look at district and school policies and practices, course placements, and student outcomes in California. Mountain View, CA: EdSource. Retrieved from http://www.edsource.org/assets/files/studies/mg-math/study11-mg-math-full.pdf.
54. WilliamsT.HaertelE.KirstM. W.RosinM.PerryM. (2011). Preparation, placement, proficiency: Improving middle grades math performance. Mountain View, CA: EdSource. Retrieved from http://www.edsource.org/pub11-middle-grades-math.html.