Economic assessments of small-scale drinking-water interventions in pursuit of MDG target 7C

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 410-411, Issue , 2011, Pages 8-15

  Cameron, John ^a   Jagals, Paul ^b,e   Hunter, Paul R ^c   Pedley, Steve ^d   Pond, Katherine ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

^b TSHWANE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (South Africa)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Economic assessment; Rural water supplies; Safer drinking water; Social cost benefit analysis; South Africa

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS; RURAL WATER SUPPLIES; SAFER DRINKING-WATER; SOCIAL COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SOUTH AFRICA;

COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; POTABLE WATER; RATING; RURAL AREAS; WATER SUPPLY;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

DRINKING WATER;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DRINKING WATER; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOAL; RURAL AREA; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY;

ARTICLE; BIOSAFETY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIARRHEA; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; HEALTH CARE COST; MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOAL 7; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RURAL AREA; SOCIOECONOMICS; SOUTH AFRICA; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DRINKING WATER; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOUTH AFRICA; UNITED NATIONS;

SOUTH AFRICA;

EID: 80655124457     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.054     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Blum D., Emeh R.N., Huttly S.R., Dosunmu-Ogunbi O., Okeke N., Ajala M., et al. The Imo state (Nigeria) drinking water supply and sanitation project, 1. Description of the 51 project, evaluation methods, and impact on intervening variables. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1990, 84(2):309-315.
2. Curry S., Weiss J. Project analysis in developing countries 2000, MacMillan Press.
3. Hutton G., Haller L. Evaluation of the costs and benefits of water and sanitation improvements at the global level, (WHO/SDE/WSH/04.04) 2004.
4. Hutton G., Haller L., Bartram J. Economic and health effects of increasing coverage of low-cost water and sanitation interventions. Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper 2006/33 2006, UNDP.
5. What works in water supply and sanitation: lessons from impact evaluation 2008, Independent Evaluation Group (IEG), World Bank, Washington D.C.
6. Jensen R., Thornton R. Early female marriage in the developing world. Gender, development and marriage 2003, Oxfam GB, Oxford, UK. C. Sweetman (Ed.).
7. Pattanayak S.K., Dickinson K., Yang J.C., Praharaj P., Poulous C. Promoting latrine use: midline findings from a randomized evaluation of a 54 community mobilization campaign in Bhadrak, Orissa. Working paper, No. 07_02 2007, Research Triangle Institute, North Carolina.
8. UNDP Human development report; beyond scarcity: power, poverty and the global water crisis. United Nations Development Programme 2006.
9. Wang Z.S., Shepard D.S., Zhu Y.C., Cash R.A., Zhao R.J., Zhu Z.X., et al. Reduction of enteric infectious disease in rural China by providing deep-well tap water. Bull World Health Organ 1989, 67(2):171-180.