Relationship between types of surface shear stress profiles and membrane fouling

Water Research

Volumn 45, Issue 19, 2011, Pages 6403-6416

  Chan, C C V ^a   Berube P R ^b   Hall, E R ^b  

^a BRITISH COLUMBIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Filtration; Gas sparging; Hydrodynamics; Membrane fouling; Surface shear stress

Indexed keywords

FILTRATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; SHEAR STRESS;

BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; FOULING CONTROL; GAS SPARGING; MEMBRANE SURFACE; SHEAR CONDITIONS; SHEAR PARAMETERS; STANDARD DEVIATION; SURFACE SHEAR STRESS;

SHEAR FLOW;

DISSOLVED GAS; FILTRATION; FOULING; HYDRODYNAMICS; MEMBRANE; PARAMETERIZATION; SHEAR STRESS; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; FOULING CONTROL; HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE FILTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; SIMULATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 80555148139     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.09.031     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Al Akoum O., Jaffrin M.Y., Ding L.H., Paullier P., Vanhoutte C. A hydrodynamic investigation of microfiltration and ultrafiltration in a vibrating membrane module. Journal of Membrane Science 2002, 197(1-2):37-52.
2. Beier S.P., Jonsson G. Separation of enzymes and yeast cells with a vibrating hollow fiber membrane module. Separation and Purification Technology 2007, 53(1):111-118.
3. Belfort G., Davis R.H., Zydney A.L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in cross-flow microfiltration. Journal of Membrane Science 1994, 96(1-2):1-58.
4. Berube P.R., Lei E. The effect of hydrodynamic conditions and system configurations on the permeate flux in a submerged hollow fiber membrane system. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 271(1-2):29-37.
5. Berube P.R., Afonso G., Taghipour F., Chan C.C.V. Quantifying the shear at the surface of submerged hollow fiber membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 279(1-2):495-505.
6. Cabassud C., Laborie S., Durand-Bourlier L., Laine J.M. Air sparging in ultrafiltration hollow fibers: relationship between flux enhancement, cake characteristics and hydrodynamic parameters. Journal of Membrane Science 2001, 181(1):57-69.
7. Chan C.C.V., Berube P.R., Hall E.R. Shear profiles inside gas sparged submerged hollow fiber membrane modules. Journal of Membrane Science 2007, 297(1-2):104-120.
8. Chan C.C.V., Berube P.R., Hall E.R. Shear stress at radial positions of submerged hollow fiber under gas sparging, and the effects of physical contact between fibers on shear profiles. Proceeding AWWA Membrane Technology Conference, Florida 2007.
9. Cheng T.W., Yeh H.M., Gau C.T. Enhancement of permeate flux by gas slugs for crossflow ultrafiltration in tubular membrane module. Separation Science and Technology 1998, 33(15):2295-2309.
10. Cui Z.F., Wright K.I.T. Flux enhancements with gas sparging in downwards crossflow ultrafiltration: performance and mechanism. Journal of Membrane Science 1996, 117(1-2):109-116.
11. Cui Z.F., Chang S., Fane A.G. The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes. Journal of Membrane Science 2003, 221(1-2):1-35.
12. Ducom G., Puech F.P., Cabassud C. Air sparging with flat sheet nanofiltration: a link between wall shear stresses and flux enhancement. Desalination 2002, 145(1-3):97-102.
13. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. Journal of Membrane Science 1995, 100(3):259-272.
14. Fulton B.G., Redwood J., Tourais M., Berube P.R. Distribution of surface shear forces and bubble characteristics in full-scale gas sparged submerged hollow fiber membrane modules. Desalination 2011, 10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.050.
15. Gaucher C., Jaouen P., Comiti J., Legentilhomme P. Determination of cake thickness and porosity during cross-flow ultrafiltration on a plane ceramic membrane surface using an electrochemical method. Journal of Membrane Science 2002, 210(2):245-258.
16. Ghosh R., Cui Z.F. Mass transfer in gas-sparged ultrafiltration: upward slug flow in tubular membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1999, 162(1-2):91-102.
17. Jaffrin M.Y., Ding L.-H., Akoum O., Brou A. A hydrodynamic comparison between rotating disk and vibratory dynamic filtration systems. Journal of Membrane Science 2004, 242(1-2):155-167.
18. Laborie S., Cabassud C., Durand-Bourlier L., Laine L.M. Flux enhancement by a continuous tangential gas flow in ultrafiltration hollow fibres for drinking water production: effects of slug flow on cake structure. Filtration and Separation 1997, 887-891.
19. LeBerre O., Daufin G. Skimmilk crossflow microfiltration performance versus permeation flux to wall shear stress ratio. Journal of Membrane Science 1996, 117(1-2):261-270.
20. Levesley J.A., Bellhouse B.J. Particulate separation using inertial lift forces. Chemical Engineering Science 1993, 48(21):3657-3669.
21. Mercier M., Fonade C., Lafforgue-Delorme C. How slug flow can enhance the ultrafiltration flux in mineral tubular membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 128:103-113.
22. Ochoa J., Coufort C., Escudie R., Line A., Paul E. Influence of non-uniform distribution of shear stress on aerobic biofilms. Chemical Engineering Science 2007, 62:3672-3684.
23. Yeo A.P.S., Law A.W.K., Fane A.G. The relationship between performance of submerged hollow fibers and bubble-induced phenomena examined by particle image velocimetry. Journal of Membrane Science 2007, 304(1-2):125-137.