Causality analysis of neural connectivity: New tool and limitations of spectral Granger causality

Neurocomputing

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 44-47

  Hu, Sanqing ^a,b   Liang, Hualou ^b  

^a HANGZHOU DIANZI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Granger causality; Linear regression model; New spectral causality; Power spectrum; Prediction; Spectral Granger causality

Indexed keywords

CAUSALITY ANALYSIS; DIFFERENT FREQUENCY; FREQUENCY DOMAINS; GRANGER CAUSALITY; INHERENT LIMITATIONS; LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL; LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS; NEW SPECTRAL CAUSALITY; POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS; RIGHT-HAND SIDES; UNDERSTANDABILITY;

FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; TIME SERIES; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

LINEAR REGRESSION;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CAUSAL MODELING; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SPECTRAL GRANGER CAUSALITY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 80555126741     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2010.10.017     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Wiener N. The theory of prediction. Modern Mathematics for Engineers, Chapter 8 1956, McGraw-Hill, New York. E.F. Beckenbach (Ed.).
2. Granger C.W.J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969, 37(3):424-438.
3. Oya H., Poon P.W.F., Brugge J.F., Reale R.A., Kawasaki H., Volkov I.O. Functional connections between auditory cortical fields in humans revealed by Granger causality analysis of intra-cranial evoked potentials to sounds: comparison of two methods. Biosystems 2007, 89(2):198-207.
4. Gow D.W., Keller C.J., Eskandar E., Meng N., Cash S.S. Parallel versus serial processing dependencies in the perisylvian speech network: a Granger analysis of intracranial EEG data. Brain Lang. 2009, 110(1):43-48.
5. Ding M., Chen Y., Bressler S.L. Granger causality: basic theory and applications to neuroscience. Handbook of Time Series Analysis 2006, 437-460. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. B. Schelter, M. Winterhalder, J. Timmer (Eds.).
6. Baccal L.A., Sameshima K. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol. Cybern. 2001, 84(6):463-474.
7. Yamashita O., Sadato N., Okada T., Ozaki T. Evaluating frequency-wise directed connectivity of BOLD signals applying relative power contribution with the linear multivariate time-series models. NeuroImage 2005, 25(2):478-490.
8. Kaminski M., Ding M., Truccolo-Filho W., Bressler S.L. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol. Cybern. 2001, 85(2):145-157.
9. Korzeniewska A., Crainiceanu C.M., Kus R., Franaszczuk P.J., Crone1 N.E. Dynamics of event-related causality in brain electrical activity. Human Brain Mapp. 2008, 29(10):1170-1192.
10. Brovelli A., Ding M., Ledberg A., Chen Y.H., Nakamura R., Bressler S.L. Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:9849-9854.
11. Sato J.R., Takahashi D.Y., Arcuri S.M., Sameshima K., Morettin P.A., Baccal L.A. Frequency domain connectivity identification: An application of partial directed coherence in fMRI. Human Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(2):452-461.
12. Kaminski M., Liang H. Causal influence: advances in neurosignal analysis. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33(4):347-430.
13. Geweke J. Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1982, 77(378):304-313.
14. Geweke J. Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1984, 79(388):907-915.
15. Barrett A.B., Barnett L., Seth A.K. Multivariate Granger causality and generalized variance. Phys. Rev. E 2010, 81(4). 041907-1-14.