The Russian revision of chronic gastritis classification: Reproducibility of the pathomorphologic picture

Arkhiv Patologii

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 52-56

  Kononov, A V ^a   Mozgovoy, S I ^a   Shimanskaya, A G ^a   Markelova, M V ^a   Osintseva, I L ^a   Vaskina, T V ^a   Panyushkin, L V ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Classification of chronic gastritis OL GA system; Expert method of estimation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GASTRITIS; HUMAN; MALE; PATHOLOGY; RUSSIAN FEDERATION;

CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; GASTRITIS; HUMANS; MALE; RUSSIA;

EID: 80455145433     PISSN: 00041955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cicchetti D. V., Feinstein A. R. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes // J. Clin. Epidemiol. - 1990. - Vol. 43, N 6. - P. 543-549.
2. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit // Psychol. Bull. - 1968. - Vol. 70, N 4. - P. 213-220.
3. Goldenring J. R., Nam K. T. Oxyntic atrophy, metaplasia, and gastric cancer // Prog. Mol. Biol. Transi. Sci. - 2010. - Vol. 96. - P. 117-131.
4. Graham D. Y., Asaka M. Eradication of gastric cancer and more efficient gastric cancer surveillance in Japan: two peas in a pod // J. Gastroenterol. - 2010. - Vol. 45, N 1.- P. 1-8.
5. Jang B. I., Lee S. H., Moon J. S. et al. Inter-observer agreement on the interpretation of capsule endoscopy findings based on capsule endoscopy structured terminology: a multicenter study by the Korean Gut Image Study Group // Scand. J. Gastroenterol. - 2010. - Vol. 45, N 3. - P. 370-374.
6. Khalid O., Radaideh S., Cummings O. W. et al. Reinter-pretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001 // Wld J. Gastroenterol. - 2009. - Vol. 15, N 30. - P. 3767-3770.
7. Landis J. R., Koch G G An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers // Biometrics. - 1977. - Vol. 33, N 2. - P. 363-374.
8. Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data // Biometrics. - 1977. - Vol. 33, N 1.- P. 159-174.
9. Morris J. A. Information and observer disagreement in histopathology // Histopathology. - 1994. -Vol. 25, N 2. - P. 123-128.
10. Rugge M., Correa P., Dixon M. F. et al. Gastric mucosal atrophy: interobserver consistency using new criteria for classification and grading // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. - 2002. - Vol. 16. - P. 1249-1259.
11. Rugge M., Correa P., Di Mario F. et al. OLGA staging for gastritis: A tutorial // Dig. Liver Dis. - 2008. - Vol. 16, N 2.-P. 150-154.
12. Rugge M., De Boni M., Pennelli G. et al. Gastritis OLGAstaging and gastric cancer risk: a twelve year clinicopathological follow-up study // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. -2010. - Vol. 31, N 10.- P. 1104-1111.
13. Sim J., Wright C. C. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size Requirements // Phys. Ther. - 2005. - Vol. 85, N 3 - P. 257-268.
14. Sipponen P., Price A. B. The Sydney System for classification of gastritis 20 years ago //J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. - 2011. - Vol. 26 (suppl. 1). - P. 31-34.
15. Tooth L. R., Ottenbacher K. J. The kappa statistic in rehabilitation research: an examination // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. - 2004. - Vol. 85, N 8. - P. 1371-1376.