Development of a novel, nearly insoluble antiadhesive membrane

European Surgical Research

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 248-253

  Mukai, T ^a   Kamitani, S ^a   Shimizu, T ^a   Fujino, M ^a   Tsutamoto, Y ^a   Endo, Y ^a   Hanasawa, K ^a   Tani, T ^a  

^a SHIGA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Insoluble membrane; nDM 14R; Pullulans

Indexed keywords

1 LACTIDE; ADHESIVE AGENT; AGAR; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; E CAPROLACTONE; GLYCOLIDE; HYALURONIC ACID; POLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADHESION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; INSOLUBLE MEMBRANE; NONHUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANIMALS; MATERIALS TESTING; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RATS; SOLUBILITY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 80455144930     PISSN: 0014312X     EISSN: 14219921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000333093     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ellis H: The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997; 577: 5-9. (Pubitemid 27115964)
2. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, et al: Adhesion- related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999; 353: 1476-1480. (Pubitemid 29204365)
3. Diamond MP, Daniell JF, Feste J, et al: Adhesion reformation and de novo adhesion formation after reproductive pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 1987; 47: 864-866. (Pubitemid 17078313)
4. Caspi E, Halperin Y, Bukovsky I: The importance of periadnexal adhesions in tubal reconstructive surgery for infertility. Fertil Steril 1979; 31: 296-300. (Pubitemid 9125391)
5. diZerega G, Rodgers KE: The Peritoneum. New York, Springer, 1992.
6. diZerega GS: Contemporary adhesion prevention. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 219-235.
7. Malm T, Bowald S, Bylock A, Busch C: Prevention of postoperative pericardial adhesions by closure of the pericardium with absorbable polymer patches. An experimental study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104: 600-607.
8. Young P, Johns A, Templeman C, Witz C, Webster B, Ferland R, Diamond MP, Block K, diZerega G: Reduction of postoperative adhesions after laparoscopic gynecological surgery with Oxiplex/AP gel: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2005; 84: 1450-1456. (Pubitemid 41571895)
9. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al: Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresobable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 183: 297-306.
10. Vrijland WW, Tseng LN, Eijkman HJ, et al: Fewer intraperitoneal adhesions with use of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose membrane. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 193-199. (Pubitemid 34111947)
11. Michael V. Ortiz, BS, Ziad T: Awad, an easy technique for laparoscopic placement of Seprafilm 2009; 19: 181-183.
12. Chuang Y, Fan CN, Cho FN, Chang YH, Kang HY: A novel technique to apply a Seprafilm (hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose) barrier following laparoscopic surgeries. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 1959-1963.
13. DeCherney AH, diZerega GS: Clinical problem of intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation following general surgery and the use of adhesion preventive barriers. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 671-688. (Pubitemid 27256040)
14. Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kinoshita K: A novel instrument and technique for using Seprafilm hyaluronic acid/ carboxymethylcellulose membrane during laparoscopic myomectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006; 16: 497-502. (Pubitemid 46489526)
15. Mehvar R: Recent trends in the use of polysaccharides for improved delivery of therapeutic agents: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2003; 4: 283-302. (Pubitemid 37220861)
16. Mishra M, Mishra B: Design and evaluation of microporous membrane coated matrix tablets for a highly water soluble drug. Chem Pharm Bull 2010: 58: 995-1000.
17. Dias LL, Giovani AR, Silva Sousa YT, Vansan LP, Alfredo E, Sousa-Neto MD, Paulino SM: Effect of eugenol-based endodontic sealer on the adhesion of intraradicular posts cemented after different periods. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17: 579-583.
18. Elias CN, Henriques FQ: Effect of thermocycling on the tensile and shear bond strengths of three soft liners to a denture base resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2007; 15: 18-23.
19. Sebti I, Delves-Broughton J, Coma V: Physicochemical properties and bioactivity of nisin- containing cross-linked hydroxypropylmethylcellulose films. J Agric Food Chem 2003; 51: 6468-6474.
20. Taparia S, Sharma R, Mathur SN, Sharma VP: Intraperitoneal aprotinin (Antagosan) in the prevention of postoperative adhesions - an experimental study in rats. Asian Med J 1985; 28: 58-64. (Pubitemid 15138274)
21. Kutlay J, Ozer Y, Isik B, Kargici H: Comparative effectiveness of several agents for preventing postoperative adhesions. World J Surg 2004; 28: 662-665. (Pubitemid 39097121)
22. diZerega GS, Campeau JD: Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 547-555. (Pubitemid 33069613)
23. Buckenmaier CC, Pusateru AE, Harris RA, et al: Comparison of antiadhesive treatments using an objective rat model. Am Surgeon 1999; 65: 274-282. (Pubitemid 29114151)
24. Kutlay J, Ozer Y, Isik B, et al: Comparative effectiveness of several agents for preventing postoperative adhesions. World J Surg 2004; 28: 662-665. (Pubitemid 39097121)
25. Harris ES, Morgan RF, Rodeheaver GT: Analysis of the kinetics of peritoneal adhesion formation in the rat and evaluation of potential antiadhesive agents. Surgery 1995; 117: 663-669.
26. Lim R, Morrill JM, Lynch RC, Reed KL, Gower AC, Leeman SE, Stucchi AF, Becker JM: Practical limitations of bioresorbable membranes in the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 35-42.
27. United States Patent 5,017,229, 1991.