Top management support and IS implementation: Further support for the moderating role of task interdependence

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 703-712

  Sharma, Rajeev ^a   Yetton, Phillip ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

management support; meta regression; random effects meta analysis; task interdependence

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

FIXED EFFECT MODELS; IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESS; MANAGEMENT SUPPORT; META ANALYSIS; META-REGRESSION; RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL; TASK INTERDEPENDENCE; TOP MANAGEMENT SUPPORT;

RANDOM PROCESSES;

EID: 80455123881     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2011.39     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. AGUINIS H, PIERCE CA, BOSCO FA, DALTON DR and DALTON CM (2011) Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods 14(2), 306-331.
2. BAJWA DS (1993) An empirical investigation of the antecedents of executive information system success. PhD Thesis, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
3. BORENSTEIN M, HEDGES LV, HIGGINS JPT and ROTHSTEIN HR (2009) Introduction to Meta-analysis. Wiley, West Sussex, U.K.
4. COHEN J, COHEN P, WEST SG and AIKEN LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 3rd edn, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
5. GINZBERG MJ (1981) Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: Promising results and unanswered questions. Management Science 27(4), 459-478.
6. HOWARD GS and MENDELOW AL (1991) Discretionary use of computers: An empirically derived explanatory model. Decision Sciences 22(2), 241-265.
7. HUNTER JE and SCHMIDT FL (1990) Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
8. HUNTER JE and SCHMIDT FL (2004) Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings 2nd edn, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
9. HWANG MI and SCHMIDT FL (2011) Assessing moderating effect in metaanalysis: A re-analysis of top management support studies and suggestions for researchers. European Journal of Information Systems advance online publication, 26 April 2011, doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.12.
10. LIPSEY MW and WILSON DB (2001) Practical Meta-analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
11. PEDHAZUR EJ (1997) Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction. Harcourt Brace, New York.
12. PURVIS RL (1994) The effects of knowledge embeddedness on the diffusion and infusion of case technologies within organizations. PhD Thesis, Florida State University.
13. SANDERS GL and COURTNEY JF (1985) A field study of organizational factors influencing DSS success. MIS Quarterly 9(1), 77-93.
14. SCHMIDT FL, OH IS and HAYES TL (2009) Fixed versus random effects models in meta analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 62(1), 97-128.
15. SHARMA R and YETTON PW (2003) The contingent effects of management support and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quarterly 27(4), 533-556.
16. SHARMA R, YETTON PW and CRAWFORD J (2009) Estimating the effect of common method variance: The method-method pair technique with an illustration from TAM research. MIS Quarterly 33(3), 473-490.
17. STEEL PD and KAMMEYER-MUELLER JD (2001) Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(1), 96-111.