Cochlear amplification and its pathology: Emphasis on the role of the tectorial membrane

Ear, Nose and Throat Journal

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 1997, Pages

  Gummer, Anthony W ^a   Preyer, Serena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOMECHANICS; COCHLEA; COCHLEA DUCT; HAIR CELL; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; SOUND;

EID: 8044257143     PISSN: 01455613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/014556139707600309     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Zwicker E. A model describing nonlinearities in hearing by active processes with saturation at 40 dB. Biol Cybern 1979; 35:243-50.
2. Zwicker E. A hardware cochlear nonlinear preprocessing model with active feedback. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 80:146-53.
3. Wiederhold ML, Kiang NYS. Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 48:950-65.
4. Guinan Jr., JJ, Gifford ML. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and thresholds at CF Hear Res 1988; 37:29-46.
5. Brown MC, Nuttall AL. Efferent control of cochlear inner hair cell responses in the guinea pig. J Physiol (Lond) 1984; 354:625-46.
6. Dolan DF, Nuttall AL. Basilar membrane movement evoked by sound is altered by electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. Abs. 17th ARO Meeting, 1994; 356.
7. Murugasu E, Russell IJ. The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basaI turn of the guinea pig cochlea. J Neurosci 1996; 16:325-32.
8. Dallos P, Harris D. Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol 1978; 41:365-83.
9. Liberman MC, Dodds LW. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear Res 1984; 16:55-74.
10. Kazee AM, Han LY, Spongr VP, et al. Synaptic loss in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus correlates with sensorineural hearing loss in the C57BL/6 mouse model of presbycusis. Hear Res 1995; 89:109-20.
11. Ashmore JF. A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: The cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. J Physiol (Lond) 1987; 388:323-47.
12. Brownell WE, Bader CR, Bertrand D, et al. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 1985; 227:194-6.
13. Dallos P, Hallworth R, Evans BN. Theory of electrically driven shape changes of cochlear outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol 1993; 70:299-323.
14. Santos-Sacchi J. Asymmetry in voltage-dependent movement of isolated outer hair cells from the organ of Corti. J Neurosci 1989; 9:2954-62.
15. Zenner HP, Zimmermann U, Gitter AH. Fast motility of isolated mammalian auditory sensory cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1987; 149:304-8.
16. Canlon B, Dulon D. Dissociation between the calcium-induced and voltage-driven motility in cochlear outer hair cells from the waltzing guinea pig. J Cell Sci 1993; 104:1137-43.
17. Dulon D, Zajic G, Schacht J. Increasing intracellular free calcium induces circumferential contractions in isolated cochlear outer hair cells. J Neurosci 1990; 10:1388-97.
18. Dulon D, Zajic G, Schacht J. Differential motile response of isolated inner and outer hair cells to stimulation by potassium and calcium ions. Hear Res 1991; 52:225-32.
19. Zenner HP, Zimmermann U, Schmitt U. Reversible contraction of isolated mammalian cochlear hair cells. Hear Res 1985; 18:127-33.
20. von Békésy G. Experiments in Hearing. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1960; 492-3.
21. Patuzzi R. Cochlear Micromechanics and Macromechanics, in Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds): The Cochlea. New York, Springer, 1996; 194-5.
22. Dallos P, Evans BN, Hallworth R. Nature of the motor element in electrokinetic shape changes of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature 1991; 350:155-7.
23. Hallworth R, Evans BN, Dallos P. The location and mechanism of electromotility in guinea pig outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol 1993; 70:549-58.
24. Forge A. Structural features of the lateral walls in mammalian cochlear outer hair cells. Cell Tiss Res 1991; 265:473-83.
25. Forge A, Davies S, Zajic G. Assessment of ultrastructure in isolated cochlear hair cells using a procedure for rapid freezing before freeze-fracture and deep-etching. J Neurocytol 1991; 20:471-84.
26. Holley MC, Ashmore JF. A cytoskeletal spring in cochlear outer hair cells. Nature 1988; 335:635-7.
27. Holley MC, Ashmore JF. On the mechanism of a high-frequency force generator in outer hair cells isolated from the guinea pig cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 1988; 232:413-29.
28. Holley MC, Ashmore JF. Spectrin, actin and the structure of the conical lattice in mammalian cochlear outer hair cells. J Cell Sci 1990; 96:283-91.
29. Holley MC, Kalinec F, Kachar B. Structure of the conical cytoskeleton in mammalian outer hair cells. J Cell Sci 1992; 102:569-80.
30. Kalinec F, Holley MC, Iwasa KH, et al. A membrane-based force generation mechanism in auditory sensory cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:8671-5.
31. Dallos P, Evans BN. High-frequency motility of outer hair cells and the cochlear amplifier. Science 1995; 267:2006-9.
32. Kolston PJ. A faster transduction mechanism for the cochlear amplifier? Trends Neurosci 1995; 18:427-9.
33. de Boer E, de Jongh HR. On cochlear encoding: potentialities and limitations of the reverse-correlation technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63:115-35.
34. Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Furosemide alters organ of Corti mechanics: Evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane J Neurosci 1991; 11:1057-67.
35. Gummer AW, Hemmert W, Zenner HP. Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: 1st crucial role in frequency tuning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 92:8727-32.
36. Mammano F, Ashmore JF. Reverse transduction measured in the isolated cochlea by laser Michelson interferometry. Nature 1993; 365:838-41.
37. Preyer S, Renz S, Hemmert W, et al. Receptor potential of outer hair cells isolated from base to apex of the adult guinea-pig cochlea: Implications for cochlear tuning mechanisms. Aud Neurosci 1996; 2:145-57.
38. Santos-Sacchi J. On the frequency limit and phase of outer hair cell motility: Effects of the membrane filter. J Neurosci 1992; 12:1906-16.
39. Housley GD, Ashmore JF. Ionic currents of outer hair cells isolated from the guinea-pig cochlea. J Physiol (Lond) 1992; 448:73-98.
40. Goodyear R, Holley M, Richardson G. Visualization of domains in the avian tectorial and otolithic membranes with monoclonal antibodies. Hear Res 1994; 80:93-104.
41. Hasko JA, Richardson GP. The ultrastructural organization and properties of the mouse tectorial membrane matrix. Hear Res 1988; 35:21-38.
42. Killick R, Legan PK, Malenczak C, et al. Molecular cloning of chick β-tectorin, an extracellular matrix molecule of the inner ear. J Cell Biol 1995; 129:535-47.
43. Kronester-Frei A. The effect of changes in endolymphatic ion concentrations on the tectorial membrane. Hear Res 1979; 1:81-94.
44. Lim DJ. Fine morphology of the tectorial membrane. Its relationship to the organ of Corti. Arch Otolaryngol 1972; 96:199-215.
45. Richardson GP, Russell IJ, Duance VC, et al. Polypeptide composition of the mammalian tectorial membrane. Hear Res 1987; 25:45-60.
46. Lim DJ. Cochlear anatomy related to cochlear micromechanics. A review. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67:1686-95.
47. Russell IJ, Sellick PM. Low-frequency characteristics of intracellularly recorded receptor potentials in guinea-pig cochlear hair cells. J Physiol (Lond) 1983; 338:179-206.
48. Rhode WS, Geisler CD. Model of the displacement between opposing points on the tectorial membrane and reticular lamina. J Acoust Soc Am 1967; 42:185-90.
49. Zwislocki JJ. Active cochlear feedback: Required structure and response phase, in Dallos P, Geisler CD, Matthews JW, et al (eds): The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing. Heidelberg, Springer, 1990; 114-120.
50. Russell IJ, Kössl M, Richardson GP. Nonlinear mechanical responses of mouse cochlear hair bundles. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 1992; 250:217-27.
51. de Boer E. Auditory physics: Physical principles in hearing theory. I. Phys Reports 1980; 62:89-174.
52. Allen JB. Cochlear micromechanics - A physical model of transduction. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68:1660-70.
53. Allen JB, Neely ST. Micromechanical models of the cochlea. Phys Today 1992; 40-47.
54. Mammano F, Nobili R. Biophysics of the cochlea: Linear approximation. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93:3320-32.
55. Neely ST, Kim DO. A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79:1472-80.
56. Shambaugh GE. A restudy of the minute anatomy of structures in the cochlea with conclusions bearing on the solution of the problem of tone perception. Am J Anat 1907; 7:245-59.
57. Zwislocki JJ. Five decades of research on cochlear mechanics. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67:1679-85.
58. Zwislocki JJ. Analysis of cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1986; 22:155-69.
59. Zwislocki JJ, Kletsky EJ. Tectorial membrane: A possible effect on frequency analysis in the cochlea. Science 1979; 204:639-41.
60. Allen JB, Fahey PF. A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94:809-16.
61. Brown AM, Gaskill SA, Williams DM. Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 1992; 250:29-34.
62. Patuzzi RB, Yates GK, Johnstone BM. Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 1989; 42:47-72.
63. Preyer S, Gummer AW. Nonlinearity of mechanoelectrical transduction of outer hair cells as the source of nonlinear basilar-membrane motion and loudness recruitment. Aud Neuro-Otol 1996; 1:3-11.
64. rd Workshop on Inner Ear Biology, August 31 - September 3, 1996, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Abstract Book. Kugler Publications, Amsterdam, 1996; 54.
65. Soucek S, Michaels L, Frohlich A. Evidence for hair cell degeneration as the primary lesion in hearing loss of the elderly. J Otolaryngol 1986; 15:175-183.
66. Dallos P. The active cochlea. J Neurosci 1992; 12:4575-85.
67. Patuzzi R. Otoacoustic emissions and the categorization of cochlear and retro-cochlear lesions. Br J Audiol 1993; 27:91-5.
68. Zenner HP, Ernst A. Cochlear-motor, transduction and signal-transfer tinnitus: Models for three types of cochlear tinnitus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 249:447-54.
69. Tasaki I, Spyropoulos CS. Stria vascularis as source of endocochlear potential. J Neurophysiol 1959; 22:149-55.
70. Salt AN, Melichar I, Thalmann R. Mechanisms of endocochlear potential generation by stria vascularis. Laryngoscope 1987; 97:984-91.
71. + secretion and the transepithelial voltage across marginal cells of stria vascularis in vitro. Hear Res 1995; 84:19-29.
72. Davis H. A model for transducer action in the cochlea. Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1965; 30:180-90.
73. Dallos P. Some electrical circuit properties of the organ of Corti. I. Analysis without reactive elements. Hear Res 1983; 12:89-119.
74. Pike DA, Bosher SK. The time course of the strial changes produced by intravenous furosemide. Hear Res 1980; 3:79-89.
75. Sewell WF. The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats. Hear Res 1984; 14:305-14.
76. Watanabe Y, Nakashima T, Yanagita N. The influence of acute venous congestion on the guinea pig cochlea. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1990; 247:161-4.
77. Canlon B. Acoustic overstimulation alters the morphology of the tectorial membrane. Hear Res 1987; 30:127-34.
78. Epstein JE, Cotanche DA. Secretion of a new basal layer of tectorial membrane following gentamicin-induced hair cell loss. Hear Res 1995; 90:31-43.
79. 2+ concentration. Hear Res 1995; 87:187-207.
80. 2+ concentration. Hear Res 1994; 79:197-215.
81. Hardesty I. On the nature of the tectorial membrane and its probable role in the anatomy of hearing. Am J Anat 1908; 8:109-88.
82. Kronester-Frei A. Ultrastructure of the different zones of the tectorial membrane. Cell Tiss Res 1978; 193:11-23.
83. Adler HJ, Saunders JC. Hair cell replacement in the avian inner ear following two exposures to intense sound. J Neurocytol 1995; 24:111-16.
84. Adler HJ, Poje CP, Saunders JC. Recovery of auditory function and structure in the chick after two intense pure tone exposures. Hear Res 1993; 71:214-24.
85. Adler HJ, Mantooth J, Raphael Y. Comparative analysis of patch lesions in the chick inner ear following acoustic trauma: Optical versus scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Microsc 1995; 9:825-31.
86. Cotanche DA. Regeneration of the tectorial membrane in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma. Hear Res 1987; 30:197-206.
87. Cotanche DA. Video-enhanced DIC images of the noise-damaged and regenerated chick tectorial membrane. Exp Neurol 1992; 115:23-6.
88. Trautwein P, Salvi RJ, Miller K, et al. Incomplete recovery of chicken distortion product otoacoustic emissions following acoustic overstimulation. Audiol Neurootol 1996; 1:86-103.
89. Canlon B. The effect of acoustic trauma on the tectorial membrane, stereocilia, and hearing sensitivity: Possible mechanisms underlying damage, recovery, and protection. Scand Audiol Suppl 1988; 27:1-45.
90. Adler HJ. Tectorial membrane repair in the quail following multiple exposures to intense sound. Audiol Neurootol 1996; 1:65-79.
91. Niemiec AJ, Raphael Y, Moody DB. Return of auditory function following structural regeneration after acoustic trauma: Behavioral measures from quail. Hear Res 1994; 79:1-16.
92. Saunders SS, Salvi RJ. Pure tone masking patterns in adult chickens before and after recovery from acoustic trauma. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98:1365-71.
93. Saunders SS, Salvi RJ, Miller KM. Recovery of thresholds and temporal integration in adult chickens after high level 525-Hz pure-tone exposure. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97:1150-64.
94. Froymovich O, Rebala V, Salvi RJ, et al. Long-term effect of acoustic trauma on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in chickens. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97:3021-9.
95. Rubel EW, Stone JS. Stimulating hair cell regeneration: On a wing and a prayer. Nature Med 1996; 2:1082-3.