Evaluation of humic acid removal by a flat submerged membrane photoreactor

Chinese Science Bulletin

Volumn 56, Issue 32, 2011, Pages 3437-3444

  Wei, Yong ^a,b   Chu, Hua Qiang ^a   Dong, Bing Zhi ^a   Li, Xuan ^a  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHANGZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

excitation and emission matrix; membrane fouling; molecular weight distribution; natural organic matter; TiO 2 UV

Indexed keywords

EID: 80355144869     PISSN: 10016538     EISSN: 18619541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-011-4712-8     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Gaffney J S, Marley N A, Clark S B. Humic and fulvic acids and organic colloidal materials in the environment. Acs Sym Ser, 1996, 651: 2-16.
2. Jacangelo J G, Demarco J, Owen D M, et al. Selected processes for removing nom - an overview. J Am Water Works Ass, 1995, 87: 64-77.
3. Vickers J C, Thompson M A, Kelkar U G. The use of membrane filtration in conjunction with coagulation processes for improved nom removal. Desalination, 1995, 102: 57-61.
4. 2 photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes. Water Res, 2008, 42: 1142-1150.
5. Xi W M, Geissen S U. Separation of titanium dioxide from photocatalytically treated water by cross-flow microfiltration. Water Res, 2001, 35: 1256-1262.
6. Fu J F, Ji M, Wang Z, et al. A new submerged membrane photocatalysis reactor (SMPR) for fulvic acid removal using a nanostructured photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater, 2006, 131: 238-242.
7. Chin S S, Lim T M, Chiang K, et al. Hybrid low-pressure submerged membrane photoreactor for the removal of bisphenol A. Desalination, 2007, 202: 253-261.
8. Chin S S, Lim T M, Chiang K, et al. Factors affecting the performance of a low-pressure submerged membrane photocatalytic reactor. Chem Eng J, 2007, 130: 53-63.
9. Huang X, Meng Y, Liang P, et al. Operational conditions of a membrane filtration reactor coupled with photocatalytic oxidation. Sep Purif Technol, 2007, 55: 165-172.
10. Choo K H, Chang D I, Park K W, et al. Use of an integrated photocatalysis/hollow fiber microfiltration system for the removal of trichloroethylene in water. J Hazard Mater, 2008, 152: 183-190.
11. Huang H, Schwab K, Jacangelo J G. Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: A review. Environ Sci Technol, 2009, 43: 3011-3019.
12. 2 photocatalysts in drinking water treatment. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2001, 40: 1712-1719.
13. Choo K H, Tao R, Kim M J. Use of a photocatalytic membrane reactor for the removal of natural organic matter in water: Effect of photoinduced desorption and ferrihydrite adsorption. J Membrane Sci, 2008, 322: 368-374.
14. Bai H, Zhang X, Pan J, et al. Combination of nano TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation with microfiltration (MF) for natural organic matter removal. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply, 2009, 9: 31-37.
15. 3 microspherical photocatalyst for water treatment. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply, 2009, 9: 39-44.
16. 2 nanotube photocatalytic oxidation for water treatment. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply, 2009, 9: 45-49.
17. 2 Part I: Discussion of adsorption and mechanism. J Photochem Photobiol A, 2002, 152: 267-273.
18. Leenheer J A, Croue J P. Characterizing aquatic dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol, 2003, 37: 18a-26a.
19. Drikas M, Chow C W K, Cook D. The impact of recalcitrant organic character on disinfection stability, trihalomethane formation and bacterial regrowth: An evaluation of magnetic ion exchange resin (MIEX (R)) and alum coagulation. J Water Supply Res T, 2003, 52: 475-487.
20. Kim H C, Yu M J. Characterization of natural organic matter in conventional water treatment processes for selection of treatment processes focused on DBPs control. Water Res, 2005, 39: 4779-4789.
21. Zhao Y, Taylor J, Hong S K. Combined influence of membrane surface properties and feed water qualities on RO/NF mass transfer, a pilot study. Water Res, 2005, 39: 1233-1244.
22. Harrington G W, Bruchet A, Rybacki D, et al. Characterization of natural organic matter and its reactivity with chlorine. Water Disinfect Nat Org Matt, 1996, 649: 138-158.
23. 2 photocatalysis of natural organic matter in surface water: Impact on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation potential. Environ Sci Technol, 2008, 42: 6218-6223.
24. Xiao Y T, Xu S S, Li Z H, et al. Progress of applied research on TiO2 photocatalysis-membrane separation coupling technology in water and wastewater treatments. Chinese Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 1345-1353.
25. Belfort G, Davis R H, Zydney A L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in cross-flow microfiltration. J Membrane Sci, 1994, 96: 1-58.
26. Ho C C, Zydney A L. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. J Colloid Interf Sci, 2000, 232: 389-399.
27. Li H, Fane A G, Coster H G L, et al. Direct observation of particle deposition on the membrane surface during crossflow microfiltration. J Membrane Sci, 1998, 149: 83-97.
28. Kim J S, Lee C H, Chang I S. Effect of pump smear on the performance of a crossflow membrane bioreactor. Water Res, 2001, 35: 2137-2144.
29. 2 nanowire photocatalytic oxidation with microfiltration for water treatment. Water Res, 2009, 43: 1179-1186.
30. Yuan W, Zydney A L. Humic acid fouling during microfiltration. J Membrane Sci, 1999, 157: 1-12.
31. Howe K J, Clark M M. Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environ Sci Technol, 2002, 36: 3571-3576.
32. Kimura K, Hane Y, Watanabe Y, et al. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. Water Res, 2004, 38: 3431-3441.
33. Coble P G, Del Castillo C E, Avril B. Distribution and optical properties of CDOM in the Arabian Sea during the 1995 Southwest Monsoon. Deep-Sea Res Part II, 1998, 45: 2195-2223.
34. Stedmon C A, Markager S. Resolving the variability in dissolved organic matter fluorescence in a temperate estuary and its catchment using PARAFAC analysis. Limnol Oceanogr, 2005, 50: 686-697.
35. Stedmon C A, Markager S. Tracing the production and degradation of autochthonous fractions of dissolved organic matter by fluorescence analysis. Limnol Oceanogr, 2005, 50: 1415-1426.
36. Mayer L M, Schick L L, Loder T C. Dissolved protein fluorescence in two maine estuaries. Mar Chem, 1999, 64: 171-179.
37. Baker A, Inverarity R. Protein-like fluorescence intensity as a possible tool for determining river water quality. Hydrol Process, 2004, 18: 2927-2945.
38. Chen J, Gu B H, Leboeuf E J, et al. Spectroscopic characterization of the structural and functional properties of natural organic matter fractions. Chemosphere, 2002, 48: 59-68.
39. Coble P G. Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation emission matrix spectroscopy. Mar Chem, 1996, 51: 325-346.
40. Swietlik J, Dabrowska A, Raczyk-Stanislawiak U, et al. Reactivity of natural organic matter fractions with chlorine dioxide and ozone. Water Res, 2004, 38: 547-558.
41. Korshin G V, Kumke M U, Li C W, et al. Influence of chlorination on chromophores and fluorophores in humic substances. Environ Sci Technol, 1999, 33: 1207-1212.