Complex texts: Analysing, understanding, explaining and interpreting meanings

Discourse Studies

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 623-633

  Wodak, Ruth ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

critical hermeneutics; critique; discourse historical approach; hermeneutic arc; intertextuality; objective hermeneutics; private language; recontextualization; retroductable; self reflection; social sciences

Indexed keywords

EID: 80355123554     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: 14617080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445611412745     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Apel K-OTowards a Transformation of Philosophy. London: Routledge; 1980:46-76.
2. Bell A.Re-constructing Babel: Discourse analysis, hermeneutics and the Interpretive Arc.Discourse Studies. 2011;13 (5): 519-568.
3. Blommaert JRe-reading the Past: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Time and Value. Martin JRWodak R, ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 2003:177-194.
4. Bohnesack R (1991) Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung: Einführung in Methodologie und Praxis qualitative Forschung. Opladen: Leske.
5. Chilton P (2004) Analyzing Political Discourse. London: Routledge.
6. Chilton P,Tian H,Wodak R.Reflections on discourse and critique in China and the West.Journal of Language and Politics. 2010;9 (4): 489-508.
7. Clarke I, Kwon W and Wodak R (2011) A context-sensitive approach to analysing talk in meetings. British Journal of Management (in press).
8. Flick U, von Kardoff E and Steinke I (eds) (2004) Companion to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
9. ForchtnerB (2011) Rhetorics of judge-penitence. How moral superiority is publicly constructed through admissions of past wrongdoing. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
10. Foucault M (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
11. Habermas J (1970) Towards a theory of communicative competence. In: Dreitzel P (ed.) Recent Sociology 2. New York: Macmillan, 115-148.
12. Habermas J (1971) Der Universalitätsanspruch der Hermeneutik. In: Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 120-159.
13. Habermas J (1972 [1968]) Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. JJ Shapiro. London: Heinemann.
14. Heer H, Manoschek W, Pollak A and Wodak R (eds) (2008) The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the War of Annihilation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
15. Jäger S,Maier F (2009) Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. In: Wodak R and Meyer M (eds) Methods of CDA. London: SAGE, 34-61.
16. Johnstone B (2007) Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Krzyżanowski M (2008) Analysing focus groups. In: Wodak R and Krzyzanowski M (eds) Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 162-181.
18. Kwon W,Clarke I,Wodak R.Organizational decision-making, discourse, and power: Integrating across contexts and scales.Discourse & Communication. 2009;3:273-302.
19. Linde C (2008) Working the Past: Narrative and Institutional Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Lorenzer A (1976) Sprachspiel und Interaktionsformen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
21. Mautner G (2009) Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In: Wodak R and Meyer M (eds) Methods of CDA. London: SAGE, 122-143.
22. Mumby DK and Clair RP (1997) Organizational discourse. In: Van Dijk TA (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, Vol. 2. London: SAGE, 181-205.
23. Myers G (2004) Matters of Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Oevermann U (1996) Becketts, Endspiel' als Prüfstein hermeneutischer Methodologie. In: König HD, Neue Versuche, Becketts Endpiel zu verstehen. Sozialwissenschaftliches Interpretieren nach Adorno. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 93-249.
25. Oevermann U, Allert T, Konau E and Krambeck J (1979) Die Methodologie einer 'objektiven Hermeneutik' und ihre allgemeine forschungslogische Bedeutung in den Sozialwissenschaften. In: Soeffner H-G (ed.) Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial und Textwissenschaften. Stuttgart: Metzler, 352-434.
26. Reichertz J (2004) Objective hermeneutics and hermeneutic sociology of knowledge. In: Flick U, von Kardoff E and Steinke I (eds) Companion to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE, 570-582.
27. Reisigl M and Wodak R (2001) Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
28. Reisigl M and Wodak R (2009) The discourse-historical approach. In: Wodak R and Meyer M (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd rev. edn. London: SAGE, 87-121.
29. Ricoeur P (1974) The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, ed. D Ihde. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
30. Ricoeur P (1981) Hermeneutics and the Social Sciences: Essays on Language, Action, and Interpretation, ed. and trans. JB Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Sayer A (2010) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.
32. Schiffrin D (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Cambridge: Blackwell.
33. Stråth B and Wodak R (2009) Europe-discourse-politics-media-history: Constructing crises. In: Triandafillydou A, Wodak R and Krzyzanowski M (eds) The European Public Sphere and the Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 15-33.
34. Tadmor N.Women and wives: The language of marriage in early modern English biblical translations.History Workshop Journal. 2006;62:1-27.
35. Tadmor N (2010) The Social Universe of the English Bible: Scripture, Society, and Culture in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Thompson JB (1981) Critical Hermeneutics. A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Titscher S, Wodak R, Meyer M and Vetter E (2000) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
38. TomincA (2011) Recontextualising Jamie Oliver into the Slovenian context. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
39. Triandafyllidou A, Wodak R and Krzyżanowski M (eds) (2009) European Media and the European Public Sphere. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
40. van Dijk TA (2008) Discourse and Context: A Socio-cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Wittgenstein L (1967) Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn, trans. G Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
42. Wodak R (1980) Das Wort in der Gruppe. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.
43. Wodak R (1986) Language Behaviour in Therapy Groups. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
44. Wodak R (1996) Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.
45. Wodak R (2000) From conflict to consensus? The co-construction of a policy paper. In: Muntigl P, Weiss G and Wodak R (eds) European Union Discourses on Un/Employment: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Employment Policy-making and Organizational Change. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 73-114.
46. Wodak R.Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis.Pragmatics & Cognition. 2007;15 (1): 203-225.
47. Wodak R (2008) Introduction: Discourse studies - important concepts and terms. In: Wodak R and Krzyzanowski M (eds) Qualitative Discourse Analysis for the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-29.
48. Wodak R (2009 [2011]) The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual, 2nd rev. edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
49. Wodak R,Fairclough N.Recontextualising the Bologna Declaration: The Austrian and Romanian case.Critical Discourse Studies. 2010;7 (1): 19-40.
50. Wodak R and Meyer M (2009) Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In: Wodak R and Meyer M (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd rev. edn. London: SAGE, 1-33.
51. Wodak R, De Cillia R, Reisigl M and Liebhart K (2009) The Discursive Construction of National Identity, 2nd rev. edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
52. Wodak R, Kwon W and Clarke I (2011) 'Getting people on board': Discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings. Discourse & Society 22 (in press).