A new viewpoint on risk control decision models for natural disasters

Natural Hazards

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1715-1733

  Tseng, Chun Pin ^a   Chen, Cheng Wu ^b,c   Tu, Yu Ping ^d  

^a CHUNG SHAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d SHU TE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Decision model; Natural disaster; Risk control

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; MODELING; NATURAL DISASTER; OPTIMIZATION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 80255131305     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-011-9861-1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Agarwal, Ashish, Shankar R, Tiwari M (2007) Modeling agility of supply chain. Ind Mark Manag 36(4): 443-457.
2. Bar-Hillel M (1980) The base rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychol 44: 211-233.
3. Bolanos R, Fontela E, Nenclares A, Paster P (2005) Using interpretive structural modeling in strategic decision making groups. Manag Decis 43(6): 877-895.
4. Handfield RB, Bechtel C (2002) The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Ind Mark Manag 31: 367-382.
5. Haque CE, Etkin D (2007) People and community as constituent parts of hazards: the significance of societal dimensions in hazards analysis. Nat Hazards 41(2): 271-282.
6. Jharkharia S, Shankar R (2005) IT-enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers. J Enterp Inf Manag 18(1): 11-27.
7. Katayama H, Bennett D (1999) Agility, adaptability and leanness: a comparison of concepts and a study of practice. Int J Prod Econ 60-61: 43-51.
8. Mandal A, Deshmukh SG (1994) Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Int J Oper Prod Manag 14(6): 52-59.
9. Power DJ, Sohal AS, Rahman S (2001) Critical success factors in agile natural disaster risk management: an empirical study. Int J Phys Distrib Logist 31(4): 247-265.
10. Prater E, Biehl M, Smith MA (2001) International natural disaster risk control tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(5/6): 823-839.
11. Raaijmakers R, Krywkow J, van der Veen A (2008) Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 46(3): 307-322.
12. Ravi V, Shankar R (2005) Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technol Forecast Soc Change 72: 1011-1029.
13. Sage AP (1977) Interpretive structural modeling: methodology for largescale systems. McGraw-Hill, New York.
14. Saxena JP, Sushil, Vrat P (1990) The impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables-a MICMAC analysis for energy conservation. Syst Res 7(4): 245-253.
15. Sharma HD, Gupta AD, Sushil (1995) The objectives of waste management in India: a future inquiry. Technol Forecast Soc Change 48: 285-309.
16. Singh MD, Shankar R, Narain R, Agarwal A (2003) Knowledge management in engineering industries-an interpretive structural modeling. J Adv Manag Res 1(1): 27-39.
17. Waddell D, Sohal AS (1998) Resistance: a constructive tool for change management. Manag Decis 36(8): 543-548.
18. Warfield JW (1974) Developing interconnected matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transcr Syst Men Cybern 4(1): 51-81.
19. Yi CS, Lee JH, Shim MP (2010) GIS-based distributed technique for assessing economic loss from flood damage: pre-feasibility study for the anyang stream basin in Korea. Nat Hazards 55(2): 251-272.
20. Yusuf YY, Gunasekaran A, Adeleye EO, Sivayoganathan K (2004) Agile natural disaster risk capabilities: determinants of competitive objectives. Eur J Oper Res 159: 379-392.
21. Zhou HJ, Wang JA, Wan JH et al (2010) Resilience to natural hazards: a geographic perspective. Nat Hazards 53(1): 21-41.