Up-scaling of water use efficiency from leaf to canopy as based on leaf gas exchange relationships and the modeled in-canopy light distribution

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 152, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 201-211

  Linderson, M L ^a,b   Mikkelsen, T N ^a   Ibrom, A ^a   Lindroth, A ^b   Ro Poulsen, H ^c   Pilegaard, K ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Beech; Denmark; Fagus sylvatica; Gas exchange; MAESTRA; Up scaling; Water use efficiency

Indexed keywords

CANOPY EXCHANGE; CARBON DIOXIDE; DECIDUOUS FOREST; EDDY COVARIANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FLUX MEASUREMENT; GAS EXCHANGE; GROWING SEASON; LEAF AREA INDEX; LIGHT INTENSITY; UPSCALING; VAPOR PRESSURE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

DENMARK; SJAELLAND;

FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA;

EID: 80155211202     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. 2 efflux of stems and branches of Norway spruce trees. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101(3):469-477.
2. Aubinet A., Grelle A., Ibrom A., et al. Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2000, 30:113-175.
3. Bacon M. Water Use Efficiency in Plant Biology 2004, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
4. 2 exchange and its components in mountain grasslands. Biogeosciences 2010, 7(8):2297-2309.
5. Baldocchi D.D., Finnigan J.J., Wilson K., Paw U., Falge K.T.E. On measuring net ecosystem carbon exchange over tall vegetation on complex terrain. Bound. -Lay. Meteorol. 2000, 96:257-291.
6. Baldocchi D.D., Verma S.B., Anderson D.E. Canopy photosynthesis and water-use efficiency in a deciduous forest. J. Appl. Ecol. 1987, 24:251-260.
7. Ball M.C., Woodrow I.E., Berry J.A. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. Progress in Photosynthesis Research. 1987, 221-224. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. J. Biggins (Ed.).
8. Beer C., Ciais P., Reichstein M., et al. Temporal and among-site variability of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level. Global and Biogeochemical Cycles 2009, 23:GB2018. 10.1029/2008GB003233.
9. 2 in determining transpiration-photosynthesis relationships of cotton leaves. Agric. Meteorol. 1965, 2:259-270.
10. Boutraa T. Improvement of Water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture: a review. J. Agron. 2010, 9(1):1-8.
11. Bruhn D., Mikkelsen T.N., Herbst M., Kutsch W.L., Ball M.C., Pilegaard K. Estimating daytime ecosystem respiration from eddy-flux data. Biosystems 2011, 103(2):309-313.
12. Burghardt M., Riederer M. Ecophysiological relevance of cuticular transpiration of deciduous evergreen plants in relation to stomatal closure and leaf water potential. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54(389):1941-1949.
13. de Pury D., Farquhar G. Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant Cell Environ. 1997, 20:537-557.
14. Dufrêne E., Davi H., Francois C., le Maire G., Le Dantec V., Granier A. Modelling carbon and water cycles in a beech forest. Part I. Model description and uncertainty analysis on modeled NEE. Ecol. Model. 2005, 185(2-4):407-436.
15. Falge E., Graber W., Siegwolf R., Tenhunen J.D. A model of the gas exchange response of Picea abies to habitat conditions. Trees 1996, 10:227-287.
16. Fleck S., Niinemets u{double acute}., Cescatti A., Tenhunen J.D. Three dimensional lamina architecture alters light-harvesting efficiency in Fagus: a leaf-scale analysis. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23:577-589.
17. Granier A., Reichstein M., Breda M., et al. Evidence for soil water control on carbon and water dynamics in European forests during the extremely dry year:. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 2007, 143:123-145.
18. Grassi G., Magnani F. Stomatal, mesophyll conductance and biochemical limitation to photosynthesis as affected by drought and leaf ontogeny in ash and oak trees. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28:834-849.
19. Grelle A., Lundberg A., Lindroth A., Morén A.-S., Ciencala E. Evaporation components of a boreal forest: variations during the growing season. J. Hydrol. 1997, 197:70-87.
20. Grossnickle S.C., Fan S., Russel J.H. Variation in gas exchange and water use efficiency patterns among populations of western red cedar. Trees 2005, 19:32-42.
21. Herbst M., Eschenbach C., Kappen L. Water use in neighboring stands of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn). Ann. Forest Sci. 1999, 56:107-120.
22. Herbst M., Kutsch W.L., Hummelshoj P., Jensen N.O., Kappen L. Canopy physiology: interpreting the variations in eddy fluxes of water vapor and carbon dioxide observed over a beech forest. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2002, 3:157-169.
23. 2 uptake in two coniferous forest canopies. Tree Physiol. 2006, 26:845-864.
24. Janssens I.A., Pilegaard K. Large seasonal changes in Q10 of soil respiration in a beech forest. Glob. Change Biol. 2003, 9:911-918.
25. Jarvis P.G., McNaughton K.G. Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1986, 15:1-49.
26. Kang Y., Outlaw W.H., Andersen P.C., Fiore G.B. Guard-cell apoplastic sucrose concentration - a link between leaf photosynthesis and stomatal aperture size in the apoplastic phloem loader Vicia faba L. Plant, cell and environment 2007, 30(5):551-558.
27. Knapp A.K., Smith W.K. Effect of water stress on stomatal and photosynthetic responses in subalpine plants to cloud patterns. Am. J. Bot. 1988, 75:851-858.
28. Kostner B. Evaporation and transpiration from forests in Central Europe - relevance of patch-level studies for spatial scaling. Meteorol. Atmos. Phy. 2001, 76:69-82.
29. Kuglitsch F.G., Reichstein M., Beer C., et al. Characterization of ecosystem water-use efficiency of European forests from eddy covariance measurements. Biogeosci. Discuss 2008, 5:4481-4519.
30. Larcher W. Physiological Plant Ecology. Ecophysiology and Stress Physiology of Functional Groups 2003, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 4th edition.
31. Larsen K.S., Ibrom A., Beier C., Jonasson S., Michelsen A. Ecosystem respiration depends strongly on photosynthesis in a temperate heath. Biogeochemistry 2007, 85(2):201-213.
32. Law B.E., Falge E., Gu L., et al. Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 2002, 108(1):14.
33. Le Roux X., Bariac T., Sinoquet H., Genty B., Piel C., Mariotti A., Girardin C., Richard P. Spatial distribution of leaf water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination within an isolated tree crown. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24:1021-1032.
34. Leuning R. A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18:339-355.
35. Linderson M.-L., Iritz Z., Lindroth A. The effect of water availability on stand-level productivity, transpiration, water use efficiency and radiation use efficiency of field-grown willow clones. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31:460-468.
36. Lindroth A., Cienciala E. Water use efficiency of short-rotation Salix viminalis at leaf, tree and stand scales. Tree Physiol. 1996, 16:257-262.
37. Masarovicova E., Stefancik L. Some ecophysiological features in sun and shade leaves of tall beech trees. Biol. Plantarum 1990, 32(5):374-387.
38. 2 exchange. Forest Ecol. Manage. 1992, 52:261-278.
39. Medlyn, B and Duursma, R., 2009. The MAESTRA model. /When downloaded 29/12 2010, the homepage was last updated in July 2009. http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/maestra.
40. Morén A.-S., Lindroth A., Grelle A. Water-use efficiency as a means of modeling net assimilation in boreal forests. Trees 2001, 15:67-74.
41. Morison J.I.L., Baker N.R., Mullineaux P.M., Davies W.J. Improving water use in crop production. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B 2008, 363:639-658.
42. 2 uptake by a Danish beech forest during the period from 1996 to 2009. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 2011, 151(7):934-946.
43. Pilegaard K., Mikkelsen T.N., Beier C., Jensen N.O., Ambus P., Ro-Poulsen H. Field measurements of atmosphere biosphere interactions in a Danish beech forest. Boreal Environ. Res. 2003, 8:315-333.
44. Rocha A.V., Su H.-B., Vogel C.S., Schmid H.P., Curtis P.S. Photosynthetic and water use efficiency responses to diffuse radiation by an aspen-dominated northern hardwood forest. Forest Science 2004, 50(6):793-801.
45. Spitters C.J.T., Toussaint H.A.J.M., Goudriaan J. Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modeling canopy photosynthesis I. Components of incoming radiation. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 1986, 38:217-229.
46. Stokes V.J., Morecroft M.D., Morison J.I.L. Comparison of leaf water use efficiency of oak and cycamore in the canopy over two growing seasons. Trees 2010, 24:297-306.
47. Tang J., Bolstad P.V., Ewers B.E., Desai A.R., Davis K.J., Carey E.V. Sap flux - upscaled canopy transpiration, stomatal conductance and water use efficiency on an old growth forest in the Great Lakes region of the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, 2006, G02009. 10.1029/2005JG000083.
48. Tanner C.B., Sinclair T.R. Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search? Limitations to efficient water use in crop production 1983, American Society of Agronomy, Madison WI, USA, 1-27.
49. Uemura A., Ishida A., Nakano T., Terashima I., Tanabe H., Matsumoto Y. Acclimation of leaf characteristics of Fagus species to previous-year and current-year solar irradiances. Tree Physiol. 2000, 20:945-951.
50. 2, water vapor and sensible heat over a deciduous forest. Bound. -Lay. Meteorol. 1986, 36:71-91.
51. Wang Y.P., Jarvis P.G. Influence of crown structural properties on PAR absorption, photosynthesis and transpiration in Sitka spruce: application of a model (MAESTRO). Tree Physiol. 1990, 7:297-316.
52. Weiss A., Norman J.M. Partitioning solar radiation into direct and diffuse, visible and near-infrared components. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 1985, 34:205-213.
53. 10 alter ecostystem carbon balance. Global Change Biol. 2005, 11:435-449.