Valence bond entanglement and fluctuations in random singlet phases

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 84, Issue 14, 2011, Pages

  Tran, Huan ^a,b   Bonesteel, N E ^a  

^a Florida State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80155211000     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.144420     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. P. W. Anderson, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 235, 1196 (1987).
2. D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.3799 50, 3799 (1994).
3. A. W. Sandvik, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95. 207203 95, 207203 (2005). (Pubitemid 41777153)
4. G. Rumer, Göttingen Nachr. Tech. 1932, 377 (1932).
5. See, for example, L. H. Kaufmann and S. L. Lins, Temperley-Lieb Recoupling Theory and Invariants of 3-Manifolds (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994).
6. N. E. Bonesteel and K. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.140405 99, 140405 (2007). (Pubitemid 47549464)
7. P. P. Martin, Potts Models and Related Problems in Statistical Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
8. G. E. Andrews, R. J. Baxter, and P. J. Forrester, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/BF01014383 35, 193 (1984).
9. D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.3908 30, 3908 (1984).
10. A. Feiguin, S. Trebst, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, A. Kitaev, Z. Wang, and M. H. Freedman, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98. 160409 98, 160409 (2007). (Pubitemid 46633688)
11. C. Holzhey, F. Larsen, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90402-2 424, 443 (1994);
12. G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.227902 90, 227902 (2003).
13. i < 0) are allowed the behavior of the models becomes much richer and the random models flow to different fixed points which depend on k;
14. see L. Fidkowski, H. H. Lin, P. Titum, and G. Refael, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.155120 79, 155120 (2009).
15. G. Refael and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.260602 93, 260602 (2004). (Pubitemid 40213716)
16. J. A. Hoyos, A. P. Vieira, N. Laflorencie, and E. Miranda, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.174425 76, 174425 (2007).
17. H. Tran and N. E. Bonesteel, Comput. Matter. Sci. CMMSEM 0927-0256 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.03.008 49, S395 (2010).
18. F. Alet, S. Capponi, N. Laflorencie, and M. Mambrini, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.117204 99, 117204 (2007). (Pubitemid 47429440)
19. R. W. Chhajlany, P. Tomczak, and A. Wójcik, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.167204 99, 167204 (2007). (Pubitemid 47613348)
20. A. B. Kallin, I. Gonzalez, M. B. Hastings, and R. G. Melko, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.117203 103, 117203 (2009).
21. J. L. Jacobsen and H. Saleur, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.087205 100, 087205 (2008). (Pubitemid 351393611)
22. k for k>2.
23. C. A. Doty and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.2167 45, 2167 (1992).
24. T. Giamarchi and H. J. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.325 37, 325 (1988).
25. N. Laflorencie and H. Rieger, Eur. Phys. J. B EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00258-x 40, 201 (2004).
26. N. Laflorencie, H. Rieger, A. W. Sandvik, and P. Henelius, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.054430 70, 054430 (2004).