Choosing the best animal species to mimic clinical colon anastomotic leakage in humans: A qualitative systematic review

European Surgical Research

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 173-181

  Pommergaard, H C ^a,c   Rosenberg, J ^a   Schumacher Petersen, C ^b   Achiam, M P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Animal models; Clinical colon anastomotic leakage; Dog; Mouse; Pig; Rabbit; Rat

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; COLON ANASTOMOSIS; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; EXPERIMENTAL CAT; EXPERIMENTAL DOG; EXPERIMENTAL GUINEA PIG; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL MONKEY; EXPERIMENTAL MOUSE; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; EXPERIMENTAL RABBIT; EXPERIMENTAL RAT; HAMSTER; HORSE; HUMAN; MACACA FASCICULARIS; MACACA MULATTA; MEDLINE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHEEP; SPECIES; SUTURING METHOD; SYRIAN HAMSTER; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 80155210209     PISSN: 0014312X     EISSN: 14219921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000330748     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. National database for colorectal cancer. Danish colorectal cancer group: Annual report 2009: http://www.dccg.dk/03-Publika tion/02-arsraport-pdf/ aarsrapport%20 2009.pdf.
2. Boccola MA, Buettner PG, Rozen WM, Siu SK, Stevenson AR, Stitz R, Ho YH: Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1,576 patients. World J Surg 2011; 35: 186-195.
3. Borowski DW, Bradburn DM, Mills SJ, Bharathan B, Wilson RG, Ratcliffe AA, Kelly SB: Volume outcome analysis of colorectal cancer-related outcomes. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1416-1430.
4. Goriainov V, Miles AJ: Anastomotic leak rate and outcome for laparoscopic intra-corporeal stapled anastomosis. J Minim Access Surg 2010; 6: 6-10.
5. Buchs NC, Gervaz P, Secic M, Bucher P, Mugnier-Konrad B, Morel P: Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 265-270.
6. Thornton M, Joshi H, Vimalachandran C, Heath R, Carter P, Gur U, Rooney P: Management and outcome of colorectal anastomotic leaks. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 313-320.
7. Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, Yamaguchi T, Fujita S, Moriya Y: Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 104-111.
8. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62:e1-e34.
9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1006-1012.
10. Bertone AL, Stashak TS, Sullins KE, Ralston SL: Experimental large colon resection at the cecocolic ligament in the horse. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 5-12.
11. Cockerell GL, MacCoy DM, Kriedemann WL, Perez R: Necessity for end colostomy with transection of the descending colon in guinea pigs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1979; 175: 954-956. (Pubitemid 10198495)
12. Ullman SL, Pavletic MM, Clark GN: Open intestinal anastomosis with surgical stapling equipment in 24 dogs and cats. Vet Surg 1991; 20: 385-391.
13. Chow PKH: Using Animal Models in Biomedical Research: A Primer for the Investigator. River Edge, World Scientific, 2008.
14. Hau J, Van Hoosier GL Jr (eds): Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science. London, CRC Press, 2003.
15. Hem A, Eide DM, Engh E, Smith A (eds): Laboratory Animal Science. Oslo, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, 2001.
16. Green EL (ed): Biology of the Laboratory Mouse, ed 2. New York, Dover publications, 1996.
17. Jeppsson B (ed): Animal Modelling in Surgical Research. London, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1998.
18. Komen N, van der Wal HC, Ditzel M, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel H, Lange JF: Colorectal anastomotic leakage: a new experimental model. J Surg Res 2009; 155: 7-12.
19. Zellweger R, Wichmann MW, Ayala A, Stein S, DeMaso CM, Chaudry IH: Females in proestrus state maintain splenic immune functions and tolerate sepsis better than males. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 106-110. (Pubitemid 27015048)
20. Waynforth HB: Experimental and Surgical Technique in the Rat. London, Academic Press, 1980.
21. Farris EJ, Griffith JQ (eds): The Rat in Laboratory Investigation. New York, Hafner Publishing Company, 1949.
22. Witek-Janusek L, Ratmeyer JK: Sepsis in the young rat: maternal milk protects during cecal ligation and puncture sepsis but not during endotoxemia. Circ Shock 1991; 33: 200-206.
23. Van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Weijma IM, Jeekel H: Transient protection of incomplete colonic anastomoses with fibrin sealant: an experimental study in the rat. J Surg Res 1993; 55: 256-260. (Pubitemid 23346858)
24. Van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Weijma IM, van den Ingh HF, Jeekel H: Healing of ischemic colonic anastomosis: fibrin sealant does not improve wound healing. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 884-891.
25. Henne-Bruns D, Kreischer HP, Schmiegelow P, Kremer B: Reinforcement of colon anastomoses with polyglycolic acid mesh: an experimental study. Eur Surg Res 1990; 22: 224-230. (Pubitemid 20350562)
26. Houston KA, Rotstein OD: Fibrin sealant in high-risk colonic anastomoses. Arch Surg 1988; 123: 230-234. (Pubitemid 18069606)
27. Byrne DJ, Hardy J, Wood RA, McIntosh R, Hopwood D, Cuschieri A: Adverse influence of fibrin sealant on the healing of high-risk sutured colonic anastomoses. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992; 37: 394-398. (Pubitemid 23040211)
28. Uludag M, Citgez B, Ozkaya O, Yetkin G, Ozcan O, Polat N, Isgor A: Effects of amniotic membrane on the healing of normal and high-risk colonic anastomoses in rats. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 809-817.
29. Nursal TZ, Anarat R, Bircan S, Yildirim S, Tarim A, Haberal M: The effect of tissue adhesive, octyl-cyanoacrylate, on the healing of experimental high-risk and normal colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 28-32. (Pubitemid 38045499)
30. Harkness JE, Turner PV, VandeWoude S, Wheler CL: Harkness and Wagner's Biology and Medicine of Rabbits and Rodents, ed 5. Ames, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
31. Medina M, Paddock HN, Connolly RJ, Schwaitzberg SD: Novel antiadhesion barrier does not prevent anastomotic healing in a rabbit model. J Invest Surg 1995; 8: 179-186.
32. Hoeppner J, Crnogorac V, Hopt UT, Weiser HF: The pig as an experimental model for colonic healing study of leakage and ischemia in colonic anastomosis. J Invest Surg 2009; 22: 281-285.
33. Gulati SM, Thusoo TK, Kakar A, Iyenger B, Pandey KK: Comparative study of free omental, peritoneal, Dacron velour, and Marlex mesh reinforcement of large-bowel anastomosis: an experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 1982; 25: 517-521. (Pubitemid 12055482)
34. Swindle MM, Smith AC, Hepburn BJ: Swine as models in experimental surgery. J Invest Surg 1988; 1: 65-79.
35. Tumbleson ME (ed): Swine in Biomedical Research. New York, Plenum Press, 1986, Vol 1.
36. Swindle MM: Surgery, Anesthesia, and Experimental Techniques in Swine, ed 1. Ames, Iowa State University Press, 1998.
37. Fleming SE: Using the pig to study digestion and fermentation in the gut; in Tumbleson ME (ed): Swine in Biomedical Research. Vol 1. New York, Plenum Press, 1986.
38. Mount LE, Ingram DL (eds): The Pig as a Laboratory Animal. London, Academic Press, 1971.
39. Schantz L, Laber-Laird K, Bingel S: Pigs: applied anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract; in Jensen SL, Gregersen H (eds): Essentials of Experimental Surgery: Gastroenterology. New York, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1996, pp 2611-2619.
40. Nordentoft T, Sorensen M: Leakage of colon anastomoses: development of an experimental model in pigs. Eur Surg Res 2007; 39: 14-16. (Pubitemid 46422223)
41. Borowski DW, Kelly SB, Bradburn DM, Wilson RG, Gunn A, Ratcliffe AA: Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on shortterm outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 880-889. (Pubitemid 47051214)
42. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G: Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. Br Med J 1980; 281: 411-414. (Pubitemid 10093062)
43. Smith JA, King PM, Lane RH, Thompson MR: Evidence of the effect of 'specialization' on the management, surgical outcome and survival from colorectal cancer in Wessex. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 583-592. (Pubitemid 36577891)
44. Thornton FJ, Barbul A: Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 549-573.
45. Davies Z: Introduction to Horse Biology. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
46. Field KJ, Sibold AL: The Laboratory Hamster and Gerbil. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1999.
47. Pawlak J, Majewski P, Markowska M, Skwarlo-Sonta K: Season-and gender-dependent changes in the immune function of Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus). Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2005; 26: 55-60. (Pubitemid 40394157)
48. Van Hoosier GL Jr, McPherson CW (eds): Laboratory Hamsters. Orlando, Academic Press, Inc, 1987.
49. Fink MP, Heard SO: Laboratory models of sepsis and septic shock. J Surg Res 1990; 49: 186-196. (Pubitemid 20241651)
50. Terril LA, Clemons DJ: The Laboratory Guinea Pig. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1998.
51. Scandinavian product guide: research models and services: https://webapps.harlan. com/productguiderequest/thank-you.asp.
52. Animal prices: department of experimental medicine. Copenhagen, Copenhagen University, 2010.