A prospective comparison of liquid-based cytology and traditional smear cytology in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 401-407

  Lee, Jun Kyu ^a   Choi, E Ryoung ^b   Jang, Tae Hoon ^b   Chung, Yun Hee ^b   Jang, Kee Taek ^b   Park, Sang Mo ^b   Lee, Jong Kyun ^b   Lee, Kyu Taek ^b   Lee, Kwang Hyuck ^b  

^a Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Endoscopic ultrasound; Fine needle aspiration; Liquid based cytology; Prospective trial; Smear

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; CYSTADENOMA; CYTOLOGY; DESMOID TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR; GRANULOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS TUMOR; LIQUID BASED CYTOLOGY; LYMPHOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METASTASIS; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS DISEASE; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMEAR; VATER PAPILLA CARCINOMA;

EID: 80155175095     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000330811     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang KJ, Wiersema LM: Endosonographyguided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1087-1095.
2. Chang KJ, Nguyen P, Erickson RA, Durbin TE, Katz KD: The clinical utility of endoscopic ltrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 387-393.
3. Erickson RA, Sayage-Rabie L, Beissner RS: Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 184-190.
4. Fritscher-Ravens A, Topalidis T, Bobrowski C, Krause C, Thonke E, Jackle S, Soehendra N: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in focal pancreatic lesions: a prospective intraindividual comparison of two needle assemblies. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 484-490.
5. Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN, Rotterdam H, Lightdale CJ, Stevens PD: EUSguided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 185-190.
6. Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL: Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2004; 363: 1049-1057.
7. Linder J: Recent advances in thin-layer cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 18: 24-32.
8. Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, Herrero R, Alfaro M, Bratti MC, Hildesheim A, Lorincz AT, Greenberg MD, Morales J, Schiffman M: Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Cancer 1999; 87: 48-55.
9. Hessling JJ, Raso DS, Schiffer B, Callicott J Jr, Husain M, Taylor D: Effectiveness of thinlayer preparations vs. conventional pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study: extended cytologic evaluation. J Reprod Med 2001; 46: 880-886.
10. Bernstein SJ, Sanchez-Ramos L, Ndubisi B: Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 308-317.
11. Meara RS, Jhala D, Eloubeidi MA, Eltoum I, Chhieng DC, Crowe DR, Varadarajulu S, Jhala N: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA biopsy of bile duct and gallbladder: analysis of 53 cases. Cytopathology 2006; 17: 42-49.
12. LeBlanc JK, Emerson RE, Dewitt J, Symms M, Cramer HM, McHenry L, Wade CL, Wang X, Musto P, Eichelberger L, Al-HaddadM, Johnson C, Sherman S: A prospectivestudy comparing rapid assessment of smears and ThinPrep for endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspirates. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 389-394.
13. Logrono R, Waxman I: Interactive role of thecytopathologist in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: an efficient approach. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 485-490.
14. Jhala NC, Jhala DN, Chhieng DC, Eloubeidi MA, Eltoum IA: Endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration: a cytopathologist's perspective. Am J Clin Pathol 2003; 120: 351-367.
15. Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, Waxman I: Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1289-1294.
16. Itoi T, Itokawa F, Sofuni A, Nakamura K, Tsuchida A, Yamao K, Kawai T, Moriyasu F: Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing trucut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles. Endoscopy2005; 37: 362-366.
17. Lai R, Stanley MW, Bardales R, Linzie B, Mallery S: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct aspiration: diagnostic yield and safety. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 715-720.
18. Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Baron PL, Sanders- Cliette A, van Velse A, Osborne JF, Hoffman BJ: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of malignant pancreatic lesions. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 854-858.
19. Chang KJ, Katz KD, Durbin TE, Erickson RA, Butler JA, Lin F, Wuerker RB: Endoscopicultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 694-699.
20. Chang KJ, Wiersema MJ, Giovannini P, Vilmann P, Erickson RA: Multi-center collaborative study on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the pancreas (abstract). Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: 417.
21. Giovannini M, Seitz JF, Monges G, Perrier H,Rabbia I: Fine-needle aspiration cytologyguided by endoscopic ultrasonography: results in 141 patients. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 171-177.
22. LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Al-Assi MT, McGrath K, Imperiale T, Tao LC, Vallery S, DeWitt J, Sherman S, Collins E: Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 475-481.
23. Leung CS, Chiu B, Bell V: Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations: nongynecologic cytology evaluation. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16: 368-371.
24. Michael CW, Hunter B: Interpretation of fine-needle aspirates processed by the Thin- Prep technique: Cytologic artifacts and diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 23: 6-13.
25. Al-Khafaji BM, Afify AM: Salivary gland fine needle aspiration using the ThinPrep technique: diagnostic accuracy, cytologic artefacts and pitfalls. Acta Cytol 2001; 45: 567-574.