Distribution in sar palaeodoses due to spatial heterogeniety of natural beta dose

Geochronometria

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 190-198

  Chauhan, Naveen ^a   Singhvi, Ashok K ^a  

^a PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (India)

Author keywords

Beta dose; Dose rate; Feldspars; Monte Carlo Simula tions; Optical dating; Quartz; Sediments

Indexed keywords

EID: 80155173177     PISSN: 17338387     EISSN: 18971695     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/s13386-011-0024-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. e) distributions: Implications for OSL dating of sediment mixtures Quaternary Geochronology 4(3): 204-230, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2008.12.001.
2. Bailey R, 2002. Simulations of variability in the luminescence charac-teristics of natural quartz and its implications for estimates of ab-sorbed dose Radiation Protection Dosimetry 100(1-4): 33-38.
3. rd: 336 pp.
4. Duller GAT, Bøtter-Jensen L and Murray AS, 2000. Optical dating of single sand-sized grains of quartz: Sources of variability Radiation Measurements 32(5-6): 453-457, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00055-X.
5. Galbraith RF, 1988. Graphical display of estimates having differing standard errors Technometrics 30(3): 271-281. (Pubitemid 20649623)
6. Galbraith RF, 1990. Radial plots: Graphical assessment of spread in ages Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 17(3): 207-214, DOI 10.1016/1359-0189(90)90036-W.
7. Huntley DJ and Baril MR 1997. The K content of K-feldspars being measured in optical dating or in thermoluminescence dating. Ancient TL 15(1): 11.
8. Juyal N, Chamyal LS, Bhandari S, Bhushan R and Singhvi AK, 2006. Continental record of the southwest monsoon during the last 130 ka: Evidence from the southern margin of the Thar desert, India Quaternary Science Reviews 25(19-20): 2632-2650, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.07.020. (Pubitemid 44308567)
9. Mayya YS, Morthekai P, Murari MK and Singhvi AK, 2006. Towards quantifying beta microdosimetric effects in single-grain quartz dose distribution Radiation Measurements 41(7-8): 1032-1039, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas. 2006.08.004. (Pubitemid 44572863)
10. McFee CJ and Tite MS, 1998. Luminescence dating of sediments-the detection of high equivalent dose grains using an imaging photon detector Archaeometry 40(1): 153-168, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1998.tb00830.x.
11. Morthekai P, 2007. Investigations on radiation dose distribution in natural environment and their implications in luminescence chronology. Unpublished Thesis, Gujarat University.
12. Murray AS and Roberts RG, 1997. Determining the burial time of single grains of quartz using optically stimulated luminescence Earth and Planetary Science Letters 152(1-4): 163-180, DOI 10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00150-7.
13. Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol Radiation Measurements 32(1): 57-73, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X. (Pubitemid 30534396)
14. Roberts R Bird M, Olley J, Galbraith R, Lawson E, Laslett G, Yoshida H, Jones R Fullagar R Jacobsen G and Hua Q, 1998. Optical and radiocarbon dating at jinmium rock shelter in northern Australia. Nature 393(6683): 358-362, DOI 10.1038/30718. (Pubitemid 28269707)
15. Singhvi AK, Stokes S, Chauhan N, Nagar YC and Jaiswal M, 2011. Changes in natural OSL sensitivity during single aliquot regenera-tion procedure and their implications for equivalent dose determi-nation Geochronometria 38(3): 231-241, DOI 10.2478/s13386-011-0028-3.