Reconciling gene and genome duplication events: Using multiple nuclear gene families to infer the phylogeny of the aquatic plant family Pontederiaceae

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 3009-3018

  Ness, Rob W ^a   Graham, Sean W ^b   Barrett, Spencer C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

gene duplication; gene tree parsimony; gene tree reconciliation; nuclear phylogenetics; Pontederiaceae

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS DNA;

AQUATIC FLORA; ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; EICHHORNIA; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE TREE PARSIMONY; GENOME; NONHUMAN; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; PLASTID; PONTEDERIACEAE; SPECIES; TREE;

BASE SEQUENCE; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA PRIMERS; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME, PLANT; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; PONTEDERIACEAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EICHHORNIA; EICHHORNIA MEYERI; PONTEDERIACEAE;

EID: 80155156423     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr119     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc. 161:105-121.
2. Barrett SCH. 1978. Pontederiaceae. In: Heywood VH, editor. In: Flowering plants of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 309-311.
3. Barrett SCH. 1988. Evolution of breeding systems in Eichhornia, a review. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 75:741-760.
4. Barrett SCH. 1993. The evolutionary biology of tristyly. In: Futuyma DJ, Antonovics J, editors. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 283-326.
5. Barrett SCH. 2004. Pontederiaceae (water hyacinth family). In: Smith N, Mori SA, Henderson A, Stevenson DW, Heald SV, editors. Flowering plants of the neotropics. Princeton (NJ): Princeton Unversity Press. p. 474-476.
6. Barrett SCH, Graham SW. 1997. Adaptive radiation in the aquatic plant family Pontederiaceae: Insights from phylogenetic analysis. In: Givnish TJ, Sytsma K, editors. Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 225-258.
7. Barrett SCH, Kohn JR, Cruzan MB. 1992. Experimental studies of mating-system evolution: The marriage of marker genes and floral biology. In: Wyatt R, editor. Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction: New approaches. New York: Chapman & Hall. p. 192-230.
8. Cantino PD, Doyle JA, Graham SW, Judd WS, Olmstead RG, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Donoghue MJ. 2007. Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta. Taxon. 56:822-846.
9. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. 2005. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21:3674-3676.
10. Cotton JA, Page RDM. 2002. Going nuclear: Gene family evolution and vertebrate phylogeny reconciled. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 269:1555-1561.
11. Doyle JJ. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst Bot. 17:144-163.
12. Duarte JM, Wall PK, Edger PP, Landherr LL, Ma H, Pires JC, Leebens- Mack J, dePamphilis CW. 2010. Identification of shared single copy nuclear genes in Arabidopsis, Populus, Vitis and Oryza and their phylogenetic utility across various taxonomic levels. BMC Evol Biol. 10:1-18.
13. Eckenwalder JE, Barrett SCH. 1986. Phylogenetic systematics of Pontederiaceae. Syst Bot. 11:373-391.
14. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
15. Frajman B, Eggens F, Oxelman B. 2009. Hybrid origins and homoploid reticulate evolution within Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae)- a multigene phylogenetic approach with relative dating. Syst Biol. 58:328-345.
16. Goodman M, Czelusniak J, Moore GW, Romero-Herrera AE, Matsuda G. 1979. Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage, a parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst Zool. 28:132-163.
17. Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, et al. 2008. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:3420-3435.
18. Goulding SE, Olmstead RG,Morden CW, Wolfe KH. 1996. Ebb and flow of the chloroplast inverted repeat. Mol Gen Genet. 252:195-206.
19. Graham SW, Barrett SCH. 1995. Phylogenetic systematics of Pontederiales: Implications for breeding system evolution. In: Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ, editors. Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution. Kew (UK): Royal Botanic Gardens. p. 415-441.
20. Graham SW, Kohn JR, Morton BR, Eckenwalder JE, Barrett SCH. 1998. Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. Syst Biol. 47:545-567.
21. Graham SW, Olmstead RG. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. Am J Bot. 87:1712-1730.
22. Graham SW, Olmstead RG, Barrett SCH. 2002. Rooting phylogenetic trees with distant outgroups: A case study from the commelinoid monocots. Mol Biol Evol. 19:1769-1781.
23. Graham SW, Reeves PA, Burns ACE, Olmstead RG. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: Interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. Int J Plant Sci. 161:S83-S96.
24. Holton TA, Pisani D. 2010. Deep genomic-scale analyses of the metazoa reject Coelomata: Evidence from single- and multigene families analyzed under a supertree and supermatrix paradigm. Genome Biol Evol. 2:310-324.
25. Horn CN. 1985. A systematic revision of the genus Heteranthera (sensu lato, Pontederiaceae). [Tuscaloosa (AL)]: University of Alabama.[PhD Thesis]
26. Kellogg EA, Bennetzen JL. 2004. The evolution of nuclear genome structure in seed plants. Am J Bot. 91:1709-1725.
27. Kohn JR, Graham SW, Morton BR, Doyle JJ, Barrett SCH. 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontederiaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Evolution 50:1454-1469.
28. Maddison WP. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst Biol. 46:523-536.
29. Maier SA, Podemski L, Graham SW, McDermid HE, Locke J. 2001. Characterization of the adenosine deaminase-related growth factor (ADGF) gene family in Drosophila. Gene 280:27-36.
30. Mathews S, Donoghue MJ. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science. 286:947-950.
31. Mayrose I, Barker MS, Otto SP. 2010. Probabilistic models of chromosome number evolution and the inference of polyploidy. Syst Biol. 59:132-144.
32. Ness RW, Wright SI, Barrett SCH. 2010. Mating-system variation, demographic history and patterns of nucleotide diversity in the tristylous plant Eichhornia paniculata. Genetics 184:381-392.
33. Olmstead RG, Palmer JD. 1994. Chloroplast DNA systematics: A review of methods and data analysis. Am J Bot. 81:1205-1224.
34. Page RDM. 1998. GeneTree: Comparing gene and species phylogenies using reconciled trees. Bioinformatics 14:819-820.
35. Page RDM, Charleston MA. 1997. From gene to organismal phylogeny: Reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 7:231-240.
36. Regier JC, Shultz JW, Zwick A, Hussey A, Ball B, Wetzer R, Martin JW, Cunningham CW. 2010. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature 463:1079-1083.
37. Saarela JM, Prentis PJ, Rai HS, Graham SW. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships in the monocot order Commelinales, with a focus on Philydraceae. Botany 86:719-731.
38. Sanderson MJ, McMahon MM. 2007. Inferring angiosperm phylogeny from EST data with widespread gene duplication. BMC Evol Biol. 7:1-14.
39. Slowinski JB, Knight A, Rooney AP. 1997. Inferring species trees from gene trees: A phylogenetic analysis of the Elapidae (Serpentes) based on the amino acid sequences of venom proteins. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 8:349-362.
40. Steele PR, Guisinger-Bellian M, Linder CR, Jansen RK. 2008. Phylogenetic utility of 141 low-copy nuclear regions in taxa at different taxonomic levels in two distantly related families of rosids. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 48:1013-1026.
41. Swofford DL. 2003. PAU.P.*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Fother methods). v. 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
42. Wehe A, Bansal MS, Burleigh JG, Eulenstein O. 2008. DupTree: A program for large-scale phylogenetic analyses using gene tree parsimony. Bioinformatics. 24:1540-1541.
43. Zwickl DJ. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [PhD Thesis]. [Austin (TX)]: The University of Texas at Austin.