Prior contest experience exerts a long-term influence on subsequent winner and loser effects

Frontiers in Zoology

Volumn 8, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Lan, Yi Ting ^a   Hsu, Yuying ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Animal contest; Fighting ability; Information; Kryptolebias marmoratus; Winner loser effect

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; CYPRINODONTOIDEI; KRYPTOLEBIAS MARMORATUS;

EID: 80155151117     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17429994     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-8-28     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bakker TCM, Milinski M. Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1991, 29:205-210.
2. Collins SA. The effect of recent experience on female choice in zebra finches. Anim Behav 1995, 49:479-486.
3. Royle NJ, Pike TW. Social feedback and attractiveness in zebra finches. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2010, 64:2015-2020.
4. Devenport LD, Devenport JA. Time-dependent averaging of foraging information in least chipmunks and golden-mantled ground-squirrels. Anim Behav 1994, 47:787-802.
5. Boogert NJ, Reader SM, Laland KN. The relation between social rank, neophobia and individual learning in starlings. Anim Behav 2006, 72:1229-1239.
6. Pravosudov VV, Mendoza SP, Clayton NS. The relationship between dominance, corticosterone, memory, and food caching in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). Horm Behav 2003, 44:93-102. 10.1016/S0018-506X(03)00119-3, 13129480.
7. Spitzer MD, Meikle DB, Solomon NG. The relationship between dominance rank and spatial ability among male meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). J Comp Psychol 2004, 118:332-339.
8. Barnard CJ, Luo N. Acquisition of dominance status affects maze learning in mice. Behav Process 2002, 60:53-59.
9. Nicol CJ, Pope SJ. The effects of demonstrator social status and prior foraging success on social learning in laying hens. Anim Behav 1999, 57:163-171. 10.1006/anbe.1998.0920, 10053083.
10. Manteuffel G, Mannewitz A, Manteuffel C, Tuchscherer A, Schrader L. Social hierarchy affects the adaption of pregnant sows to a call feeding learning paradigm. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2010, 128:30-36.
11. Croney CC, Prince-Kelly N, Meller CL. A note on social dominance and learning ability in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007, 105:254-258.
12. Pongrácz P, Viktória V, Bánhegyi P, Miklósi A. How does dominance rank status affect individual and social learning performance in the dog (Canis familiaris)?. Anim Cogn 2008, 11:75-82.
13. Kaczer L, Pedetta S, Maldonado H. Aggressiveness and memory: Subordinate crabs present higher memory ability than dominants after an agonistic experience. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2007, 87:140-148. 10.1016/j.nlm.2006.08.002, 16973384.
14. Fitchett AE, Collins SA, Barnard CJ, Cassaday HJ. Subordinate male mice show long-lasting differences in spatial learning that persist when housed alone. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2005, 84:247-251. 10.1016/j.nlm.2005.08.004, 16169260.
15. Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL. Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 2006, 81:33-74. 10.1086/503923, 16460581.
16. Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof MWG. What sets the odds of winning and losing?. Trends Ecol Evol 2006, 21:16-21. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.014, 16701465.
17. Hsu Y, Lee IH, Lu CK. Prior contest information: mechanisms underlying winner and loser effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2009, 63:1247-1257.
18. Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA. Learning your own strength: winner and loser effects should change with age and experience. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 2010, 277:1427-1434.
19. Whitehouse MEA. Experience influences male-male contests in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Anim Behav 1997, 53:913-923.
20. Mesterton-Gibbons M. On the evolution of pure winner and loser effects: A game-theoretic model. Bull Math Biol 1999, 61:1151-1186. 10.1006/bulm.1999.0137, 17879874.
21. Hsu Y, Wolf LL. The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav 1999, 57:903-910. 10.1006/anbe.1998.1049, 10202098.
22. Hsu Y, Wolf LL. The winner and loser effect: what fighting behavious are influenced?. Anim Behav 2001, 61:777-786.
23. Huang SP, Yang SY, Hsu Y. Persistence of winner and loser effects depends on the behaviour measured. Ethology 2011, 117:171-180.
24. Earley RL, Hsu Y. Reciprocity between endocrine state and contest behavior in the killifish, Kryptolebias marmoratus. Horm Behav 2008, 53:442-451. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.11.017, 18191133.
25. Hsu Y, Lee SP, Chen MH, Yang SY, Cheng KC. Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. Anim Behav 2008, 75:1641-1649.
26. Bégin J, Beaugrand JP, Zayan R. Selecting dominants and subordinates at conflict outcome can confound the effects of prior dominance or subordination experience. Behav Process 1996, 36:219-226.
27. Fuxjager MJ, Marler CA. How and why the winner effect forms: influences of contest environment and species differences. Behav Ecol 2010, 21:37-45.
28. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 2004, 19:372-378. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009, 16701288.
29. Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M. Recent models for adaptive personality differences: a review. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 2010, 365:3947-3958.
30. Stamps J, Groothuis TGG. The development of animal personality: relevance, concepts and perspectives. Biol Rev 2010, 85:301-325. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00103.x, 19961473.
31. Wolf M, Weissing FJ. An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 2010, 365:3959-3968.
32. Neat FC, Taylor AC, Huntingford FA. Proximate costs of fighting in male cichlid fish: the role of injuries and energy metabolism. Anim Behav 1998, 55:875-882. 10.1006/anbe.1997.0668, 9632474.
33. Chase ID, Bartolomeo C, Dugatkin LA. Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: how long do winners keep winning?. Anim Behav 1994, 48:393-400.
34. Bergman DA, Kozlowski CP, McIntyre JC, Huber R, Daws AG, Moore PA. Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, orconectes rusticus. Behaviour 2003, 140:805-825.
35. Schuett GW. Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. Anim Behav 1997, 54:213-224. 10.1006/anbe.1996.0417, 9268451.
36. Bakker TCM, Bruijn E, Sevenster P. Asymmetrical effects of prior winning and losing on dominance in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ethology 1989, 82:224-229.
37. Taylor DS, Fisher MT, Turner BJ. Homozygosity and heterozygosity in three populations of Rivulus marmoratus. Environ Biol Fishes 2001, 61:455-459.
38. Harrington RWJ. Ovipaous hermaphroditic fish with internal self-fertilization. Science 1961, 134:1740-1750.
39. Mackiewicz M, Tatarenkov A, Taylor DS, Turner BJ, Avise JC. Extensive outcrossing and androdioecy in a vertebrate species that otherwise reproduces as a self-fertilizing hermaphrodite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:9924-9928. 10.1073/pnas.0603847103, 1502555, 16785430.
40. Davis WP, Taylor DS, Turner BJ. Field observations of the ecology and habits of mangrove rivulus (Rivulus marmoratus) in Belize and Florida (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Ichthyol Explor Freshwaters 1990, 1:123-134.
41. Taylor DS, Turner BJ, Davis WP, Chapman BB. Natural history note - A novel terrestrial fish habitat inside emergent logs. Am Nat 2008, 171:263-266. 10.1086/524960, 18197778.
42. Grizzle JM, Thiyagarajah A. Skin histology of Rivulus ocellatus marmoratus: apparent adaptation for aerial respiration. Copeia 1987, 1987:237-240.
43. Taylor DS. Adaptive specializations of the Cyprinodont fish Rivulus marmoratus. Fla Sci 1990, 53:239-248.
44. Huehner MK, Schramm ME, Hens MD. Notes on the behavior and ecology of the killifish Rivulus marmoratus poey 1880 (Cyprinodontidae). Fla Sci 1985, 48:1-7.
45. Molloy PP, Nyboer EA, Cote IM. Male-male competition in a mixed-mating fish. Ethology 2011, 117:586-596.