Joint estimation of supply and use tables

Papers in Regional Science

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 863-882

  Temurshoev, Umed ^a   Timmer, Marcel P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biproportional adjustments; Optimization; Supply; Use

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION;

SPAIN;

EID: 80155148074     PISSN: 10568190     EISSN: 14355957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00345.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beutel J (2002) The economic impact of objective 1 interventions for the period 2000-2006. Report to the Directorate-General for Regional Policies, Konstanz
2. Bregman LM (1967) The relaxation method of finding the common point of convexsets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 7: 200-217
3. Butterfield M, Mules T (1980) A testing routine for evaluating cell by cell accuracy in short-cut regional input-output tables. Journal of Regional Science 20: 293-310
4. Chiang AC (1984) Fundamentals methods of mathematical economics (3rd edition). McGraw-Hill, New York
5. Eurostat (2008) European manual of supply, use and input-output tables: Methodologies and working papers. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
6. Gordon P, Park J, Richardson HW (2009) Modeling input-output impacts with substitutions in the household sector: A numerical example. Economic Modelling 26: 696-701
7. Harthoorn R, van Dalen J (1987) On the adjustment of tables with Lagrange multipliers. NA-024. Central Bureau of Statistics, The Netherlands, National Accounts Research Division, Voorburg
8. Huang W, Kobayashi S, Tanji H (2008) Updating an input-output matrix with sign-preservation: Some improved objective functions and their solutions. Economic Systems Research 20: 111-123
9. Jackson RW, Murray AT (2004) Alternative input-output matrix updating for mulations. Economic Systems Research 16: 135-148
10. Junius T, Oosterhaven J (2003) The solution of updating or regionalizing a matrix with both positive and negative entries. Economic Systems Research 15: 87-96
11. Knudsen DC, Fotheringham AS (1986) Matrix comparison, goodness-of-fit, and spatial interaction modeling. International Regional Science Review 10: 127-147
12. Kullback S (1959) Information theory and statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York
13. Kuroda M (1988) A method of estimation for the updating transaction matrix in the input-output relationships. In: Uno K, Shishido S (eds) Statistical data bank systems: Socio-economic database and model building in Japan. North Holland, Amsterdam
14. Lahr ML (2001) A strategy for producing hybrid regional input-output tables. In: Lahr ML, Dietzenbacher E (eds) Input-output analysis: Frontiers and extensions. Palgrave, New York
15. Lahr ML, de Mesnard L (2004) Biproportional techniques in input-output analysis: Table updating and structural analysis. Economic Systems Research 16: 115-134
16. Lamond B, Stewart NF (1981) Bregman's balancing method. Transportation Research B 15: 239-248
17. Lemelin A (2009) A GRAS variant solving for minimum information loss. Economic Systems Research 21: 399-408
18. Lenzen M, Gallego B, Wood R (2006) A flexible approach to matrix balancing under partial information. Economic Systems Research 11: 1-24
19. Lenzen M, Wood R, Gallego B (2007) Some comments on the GRAS method. Economic Systems Research 19: 461-465
20. Lenzen M, Gallego B, Wood R (2009) Matrix balancing under conflicting information. Economic Systems Research 21: 23-44
21. de Mesnard L, Miller RE (2006) A note on added information in the RAS procedure: Reexamination of some evidence. Journal of Regional Science 46: 517-528
22. Miller RE, Blair PD (2009) Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. Mínguez R, Oosterhaven J, Escobedo F (2009) Cell-corrected RAS method (CRAS) for updating or regionalizing an input-output matrix. Journal of Regional Science 49: 329-348
24. O'Mahony M, Timmer PM (2009) Output, input and productivity measures at the industry level: The EU KLEMS database. Economic Journal 119: F374-F403
25. Pavia JM, Cabrer B, Sala R (2009) Updating input-output matrices: Assessing alternatives through simulation. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 79: 1467-1482
26. ten Raa T (2005) The economics of input-output analysis. Cambridge Univeristy Press, Cambridge
27. Robinson S, Cattaneo A, El-Said M (2001) Updating and estimating a social accounting matrix using cross entropy methods. Economic Systems Research 13: 47-64
28. Temurshoev U, Timmer MP (2010) Joint estimation of supply and use tables. WIOD Working Paper Nr. 3. URL.
29. Temurshoev U, Webb C, Yamano N (2010) Projection of supply and use tables: Methods and their empirical assessment. Economic Systems Research. forthcoming
30. Thissen M, Löfgren H (1998) A new approach to SAM updating with an application to Egypt. Environment and Planning A 30: 1991-2003
31. Timmer MP, Aulin-Ahmavaara P, Ho M (2005) EUKLEMS Road map WP1. URL.