A new method to estimate input-output tables by means of structural lags, tested on Spanish regions

Papers in Regional Science

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 829-844

  Oosterhaven, Jan ^a   Escobedo Cardeñoso, Fernando ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BURGOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

C61; C67; D57; Input output tables; R15; RAS; Spanish regions; Spatial projection

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS;

SPAIN;

EID: 80155123669     PISSN: 10568190     EISSN: 14355957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00340.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bacharach M (1970) Biproportional matrices and input-output change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
2. Bachem A, Korte B (1979) On the RAS-algorithm. Computing 23: 189-198
3. Barker TS (1975) Some experiments in projecting intermediate demand. In: Allen RIG, Gossling WF (eds) Estimating and projecting input-output coefficients. Input-Output Publishing Company, London
4. Boomsma P, Oosterhaven J (1992) A double-entry method for the construction of bi-regional input-output tables. Journal of Regional Science 32: 269-284
5. Butterfield M, Mules T (1980) A testing routine for evaluating cell by cell accuracy in short-cut regional input-output tables. Journal of Regional Science 20: 293-310
6. Czamanski S, Malizia EE (1969) Applicability and limitations in the use of national input-output tables for regional studies. Papers of the Regional Science Association 23: 65-78
7. DataComex (2009) Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Trade of Spain. URL.
8. Deming WE, Stephan FF (1940) On a least-squares adjustment of a sampled frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11: 427-444
9. Escobedo-Cardeñoso F, Oosterhaven J (2009) Hybrid interregional input-output construction methods: Applied to the seven region Spanish input-output table. Unpublished manuscript
10. Eurostat (2010) ESA 95 Supply Use and Input-Output tables. URL.
11. Gerking SD (1979) Reconciling reconciliation procedures in regional input-output analysis. International Regional Science Review 4: 23-36
12. Hewings GJD (1969) Regional input-output models using national data: The structure of the West Midlands economy. The Annals of Regional Science 3: 179-191
13. Hewings GJD (1977) Evaluating the possibilities for exchanging regional input-output coefficients. Environment and Planning A 9: 927-944
14. Jensen RC, McGaurr D (1977) Reconciliation techniques in input-output analysis: Some comparisons and implications. Urban Studies 14: 327-337
15. Jensen RC, Hewings GJD, West GR (1987) On a taxonomy of economies. Australian Journal of Regional Studies 2: 3-24
16. Johansen L (1968) Explorations in long-term projections for the Norwegian economy. Economics of Planning 8: 70-117
17. Junius T, Oosterhaven J (2003) The solution of updating or regionalizing a matrix with both positive and negative entries. Economic Systems Research 15: 87-96
18. Lecomber R (1969) RAS projections when two or more complete matrices are known. Economics of Planning 9: 267-278
19. de Mesnard L (2004) Biproportional methods of structural change analysis: A typological survey. Economic Systems Research 16: 205-230
20. de Mesnard L, Miller RE (2006) A note on added information in the RAS procedure: Reexamination of some evidence. Journal of Regional Science 46: 517-528
21. Miller RE (1998) Regional and interregional input-output analysis. In: Isard W, Azis IJ, Drennan MP, Miller RE, Saltzman S, Thorbecke E (eds) Methods of interregional and regional analysis. Ashgate, Brookfield, VE
22. nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. Mínguez R, Oosterhaven J, Escobedo F (2009) Cell-corrected RAS method (CRAS) for updating or regionalizing an input-output matrix. Journal of Regional Science 49: 329-348
24. Morrison WI, Smith P (1974) Nonsurvey input-output techniques at the small area level: An evaluation. Journal of Regional Science 14: 1-14
25. Oosterhaven J, Piek G, Stelder D (1986) Theory and practice of updating regional versus interregional interindustry tables. Papers in Regional Science 59: 57-72
26. Sawyer C, Miller RE (1983) Experiments in regionalization of a national input-output table. Environment and Planning A 15: 1501-1520
27. Schafer WA, Chu K (1969) Non-survey techniques for constructing regional interindustry models. Papers in Regional Science 23: 83-104
28. Snickars F, Weibull JW (1977) A minimum information principle theory and practice. Regional Science and Urban Economics 7: 137-168
29. Stevens BH, Trainer GA (1980) Error generation in regional input-output analysis and its implications for non-survey models. In: Pleeter S (ed) Economic impact analysis: Methodology and applications. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, MA
30. Stone R (1961) Input-output and national accounts. Office of European Economic Cooperation, Paris
31. Su TT (1970) A note on regional input-output models. Southern Economic Journal 37: 325-327
32. Thakur SK (2008) Identification of temporal Fundamental Economic Structure (FES) of India: An input-output and cross-entropy analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 19: 132-151
33. Thumann RG (1978) A comment on evaluating the possibility for exchanging regional input-output coefficients. Environment and Planning A 10: 321-325
34. Tilanus CB (1966) Input-output experiments: The Netherlands 1948-1961. University Press Rotterdam, Rotterdam
35. Tilanus CB, Theil H (1965) The information approach to the evaluation of input-output forecasts. Econometrica 33: 847-862