Introduction: The value of virtue to management and organizational theory and practice

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 227-230

  Neubert, Mitchell J ^a  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80055091161     PISSN: 08250383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.218     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Alford, H.J., & Naughton, M.J. (2001) Managing as if faith mattered: Christian social principles in the modern organization. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
2. Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (2nd ed.). (T. Irwin,Trans.). Indianapolis, IN.: Hackett Publishing.
3. Bacharach, S.B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 496-515.
4. Beadle, R., & Moore, G. (2006). MacIntyre on virtue and organization. Organization Studies, 27, 323-340. (Pubitemid 43392925)
5. Block, P. (1993). Stewardship: Choosing service over selfinterests. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
6. Cameron, K. (2006). Good or not bad: Ethics and standards in managing change. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(3), 317-323.
7. Cameron, K.S., Dutton, J.E., & Quinn, R.E. (Eds.) (2003). Positive organizational scholarship. San Francisco, CA: Berrett- Koehler.
8. Calas, M.B., & Smircich, L. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24, 649-671.
9. Cascio, W.F. (2006). Decency means more that 'always low price': A comparison of Costco to Wal-Mart's Sam's Club. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(3), 26-37. (Pubitemid 44326579)
10. Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
11. Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20-47.
12. Donaldson, L. (2005). For positive management theories while retaining science: Reply to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 109-113.
13. Dyck, B., & Neubert, M.J. (2010). Management: Current practices and new directions. Boston MA: Cengage/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
14. Dyck, B., & Schroeder, D. (2005). Management, theology and moral points of view: Towards an alternative to the conventional materialist- individualist ideal-type of management. Journal of Management Studies, 42(4), 705-735. (Pubitemid 40816199)
15. Dyck, B., & Weber, J.M. (2006). Conventional and radical moral agents: An exploratory look at Weber's moralpoints- of-view and virtues. Organization Studies, 27(3), 429-450. (Pubitemid 43384502)
16. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R.I. 2005. Economic language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8-24. (Pubitemid 40076745)
17. Fortin, M., & Fellenz, M.R. (2008). Hypocrisies of fairness: Towards a more reflexive ethical base in organizational justice research and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 415-433.
18. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing.
19. Freeman, R.E. (1999). Response: Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 233-236.
20. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75-91.
21. Giacalone, R.A., & Thompson, K.R. (2006). Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(3), 266-277.
22. Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey in the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York, NY: Paulist Press.
23. Hamel, G. (2007). The future of management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
24. Jones, T.M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
25. Kanter, R.M. (2005). What theories do audiences want? Exploring the demand side. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 93-95.
26. Kasser, T. (2003). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA.: Bradford Book, MIT Press.
27. Lewis, M.W., & Grimes, A.J. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 672-690.
28. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. South Bend, IN.: University of Notre Dame Press.
29. McCarty, J.A., & Shrum, L.J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 20, 93-104.
30. McCloskey, D. (2008). Adam Smith, the last of the former virtue ethicists. History of Political Economy, 40(1), 43-71.
31. Mintzberg, H. (2005). How inspiring. How sad. Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal's paper. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 108.
32. Moore, G. (2002). On the implications of the practiceinstitutional distinction: MacIntyre and the application of modern virtue ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 19-32.
33. Moore, G. (2008). Re-imagining the morality of management: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 483-511.
34. Neubert, M.J., Carlson, D.S., Kacmar, K.M., Roberts, J.A. & Chonko, L.B. (2009). The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 157-170.
35. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M.E.P. (Eds.) (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Pfeffer, J. 2005. Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 96-100.
37. Rees, W.E. 2002. Globalization and sustainability: Conflict or convergence? Bulletin of Science, Technology in Society, 22(4), 249-268.
38. Schumacher, E.F. (1973). Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London, England: Blond & Briggs Ltd.
39. Smith, A. (1959). In D.D. Raphael, & A.L. Macfi(Eds.), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, 1976. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics.
40. Van de Ven, A.H. 1989. Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 486-489.
41. Weaver, G. 2006. Virtue in organizations: Moral agencies as a foundation for moral agency. Organizational Studies, 27(3), 341-68. (Pubitemid 43384499)
42. Weber, M. 1958. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. (transl. T Parsons). NY: Scribner's.