Open3DALIGN: An open-source software aimed at unsupervised ligand alignment

Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 777-783

  Tosco, Paolo ^a   Balle, Thomas ^b   Shiri, Fereshteh ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c RAZI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Alignment; Cheminformatics; Pharmacophore; Superposition

Indexed keywords

ALIGNMENT; OPEN SYSTEMS; PHARMACODYNAMICS;

CHEMINFORMATICS; CROSS-PLATFORM SOFTWARE; HEAVY ATOMS; MATCHINGS; OPEN-SOURCE; OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARES; PHARMACOPHORES; RIGID BODY; SUPERPOSITION; WORKERS';

OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFORMATION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHARMACOPHORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; UNSUPERVISED LIGAND ALIGNMENT; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 80055090579     PISSN: 0920654X     EISSN: 15734951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9462-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Chan SL, Labute P (2010) Training a scoring function for the alignment of small molecules. J Chem Inf Model 50:1724-1735
2. Lemmen C, Lengauer T (2000) Computational methods for the structural alignment of molecules. J Comput Aided Mol Des 14:215-232 (Pubitemid 30175941)
3. Leach AR, Gillet VJ, Lewis RA, Taylor R (2010) Three-dimensional pharmacophore methods in drug discovery. J Med Chem 53:539-558
4. Rönkkö T, Tervo AJ, Parkkinen J, Poso A (2006) BRUTUS: optimization of a grid-based similarity function for rigid-body molecular superposition. II. Description and characterization. J Comput Aided Mol Des 20:227-236 (Pubitemid 44317515)
5. Vainio MJ, Santeri Puranen J, Johnson MS (2009) ShaEP: molecular overlay based on shape and electrostatic potential. J Chem Inf Model 49:492-502
6. Güner O, Clement O, Kurogi Y (2004) Pharmacophore modeling and three dimensional database searching for drug design using Catalyst: recent advances. Curr Med Chem 11:2991-3005 (Pubitemid 39369268)
7. Dixon SL, Smondyrev AM, Knoll EH, Rao SN, Shaw DE, Friesner RA (2006) PHASE: a new engine for pharmacophore perception, 3D QSAR model development, and 3D database screening: 1. Methodology and preliminary results. J Comput Aided Mol Des 20:647-671 (Pubitemid 46023928)
8. Richmond NJ, Abrams CA, Wolohan PRN, Abrahamian E, Willett P, Clark RD (2006) GALAHAD: 1. Pharmacophore identification by hypermolecular alignment of ligands in 3D. J Comput Aided Mol Des 20:567-587 (Pubitemid 44823892)
9. Van Drie JH (2010) History of 3D pharmacophore searching: commercial, academic and open-source tools. Drug Disc Today 7:e255-e262
10. Taminau J, Thijs G, De Winter H (2008) Pharao: pharmacophore alignment and optimization. J Mol Graph Model 27:161-169
11. Steinbeck C, Hoppe C, Kuhn S, Floris M, Guha R, Willighagen EL (2006) Recent developments of the chemistry development kit (CDK)-an open-source java library for chemo- and bioinformatics. Curr Pharm Des 12:2111-2120 (Pubitemid 43891407)
12. Tosco P, Balle T (2011) Open3DGRID: an open-source software aimed at high-throughput generation of molecular interaction fields (MIFs); http://open3dgrid.org/. Accessed 13 June 2011
13. Tosco P, Balle T (2011) Open3DQSAR: a new open-source software aimed at high-throughput chemometric analysis of molecular interaction fields. J Mol Model 17: 201-208; http:// open3dqsar.org/. Accessed 13 June 2011
14. O'Connor SD, Smith PE, al-Obeidi F, Pettitt BM (1992) Quenched molecular dynamics simulations of tuftsin and proposed cyclic analogs. J Med Chem 35:2870-2881
15. TINKER-Software tools for molecular design, version 5.1; http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker/. Accessed 13 June 2011
16. Tosco P, Balle T, Shiri F (2011) SDF2XYZ2SDF: how to exploit TINKER power in chemoinformatics projects. J Mol Model. Doi: 1007/s00894-011-1111-7; http://sdf2xyz2sdf.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 13 June 2011
17. Guha R, Howard MT, Hutchison GR, Murray-Rust P, Rzepa H, Steinbeck C, Wegner JK, Willighagen E (2006) The Blue Obelisk-Interoperability in chemical informatics. J Chem Inf Model 46:991-998
18. MOE 2010.10; Chemical Computing Group Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2010
19. Kirchmair J, Wolber G, Laggner C, Langer T (2006) Comparative performance assessment of the conformational model generators Omega and Catalyst: a large-scale survey on the retrieval of protein-bound ligand conformations. J Chem Inf Model 46:1848-1861 (Pubitemid 44185709)
20. Richmond NJ, Willett P, Clark RD (2004) Alignment of threedimensional molecules using an image recognition algorithm. J Mol Graph Model 23:199-209 (Pubitemid 39195288)
21. Jonker R, Volgenant A (1987) A shortest augmenting path algorithm for dense and sparse linear assignment problems. Computing 38:325-340 (Pubitemid 17658282)
22. Kearsley SK (1989) On the orthogonal transformation used for structural comparisons. Acta Cryst A45:208-210
23. Petitjean M (1998) Interactive maximal common 3D substructure searching with the combined SDM/RMS algorithm. Computers Chem 22:463-465 (Pubitemid 128428280)
24. Sutherland JJ, O'Brien LA, Weaver DF (2004) A comparison of methods for modeling quantitative structure-activity relationships. J Med Chem 47:5541-5554 (Pubitemid 39382801)