Problems in correlation of Czech national soil classification and World Reference Base 2006

Geoderma

Volumn 167-168, Issue , 2011, Pages 54-60

  Zádorová, Tereza ^a   Penížek, Vít ^a,b  

^a CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Soil maps; Soil systematics; Soil taxa conversion; Soil units

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL SOILS; ANALYTICAL APPROACH; CZECHOSLOVAKIA; EXPERT KNOWLEDGE; HIGH PROBABILITY; LEGACY DATA; MORPHOLOGICAL DATA; QUANTITATIVE APPROACH; QUANTITATIVE DATA; SEMANTIC APPROACH; SOIL CLASSIFICATION; SOIL DATA; SOIL MAPPING; SOIL MAPS; SOIL PROFILES; SOIL PROPERTY; SOIL TYPES; TAXONOMIC UNITS; TWO CLASSIFICATION;

CORRELATION METHODS; MAPPING; SEMANTICS;

SOILS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL SOIL; CORRELATION; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; INCOMPATIBILITY; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOIL CLASSIFICATION; SOIL PROFILE; SOIL TYPE;

CZECHOSLOVAKIA;

EID: 80055053271     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barreta-Bassols N., Zinck J.A., Ranst E.V. Local soil classification and comparison of indigenous and technical soil maps in a Mesoamerican community using spatial analysis. Geoderma 2006, 135:140-162.
2. Birkeland P.W. Soils and Geomorphology 1999, Oxford University Press, New York. third ed.
3. Bockheim J.G., Gennadiyev A.N. The role of soil-forming processes in the definition of taxa in Soil Taxonomy and the World Soil Reference Base. Geoderma 2000, 95:53-72.
4. Dazzi C., Papa G.L., Palermo V. Proposal for a new diagnostic horizon for WRB Anthrosols. Geoderma 2009, 151:16-21.
5. Droogers P., Bouma J. Soil survey input in exploratory modeling of sustainable soil management practices. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1997, 61:1704-1710.
6. European Soil Bureau Network, Scientific Committee The European Soil Database (distribution version 2) 2003, EUR 19945 Online CD-ROM.
7. FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources 1998, FAO, Rome.
8. Gerasimova M.I. Chinese soil taxonomy: between the American and the international classification systems. Eurasian Soil Science 2010, 43:945-949.
9. Gimenéz J.E. The world reference base for soil resources (WRB) and its application to some soils of Argentina. Geociencias 2011, 30:15-21.
10. Gray J.M., Humphreys G.S., Deckers J.A. Distribution patterns of World Reference Base soil groups relative to soil forming factors. Geoderma 2011, 160:373-383.
11. Hraško J., Němeček J., Šály R., Šurina B. Morphogenetic Classification System of Soils of the CSFR 1991, VÚPÚ, Bratislava, in Slovak.
12. IUSS Working Group WRB Guidelines for Constructing Small-Scale Map Legends Using the World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2010, Addendum to the World Reference Base for Soil Resources, FAO, Rome.
13. IUSS Working Group WRB World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006 2006, FAO, Rome.
14. Kleber M., Mikutta C., Jahn R. Andosols in Germany - pedogenesis and properties. Catena 2004, 56:67-83.
15. Krasilnikov P., Ibanez-Martí J.-J., Arnold R.W., Shoba S. Handbook of Soil Terminology 2009, Correlation and Classification, Earthscan, London.
16. Láng V., Fuchs M., Waltner I., Michéli E. Taxonomic distance measurements applied for soil correlation. Agrokémia és Talajtan 2010, 59:57-64.
17. Minasny B., McBratney A., Hartemink A.E. Global pedodiversity, taxonomic distance, and the World Reference Base. Geoderma 2010, 155:132-139.
18. Ministry of agriculture Large-scale Mapping of Agricultural Soils in Czechoslovakia. Final reports, in Czech 1963-1967.
19. Mojiri A., Jalalian A., Honarjoo N. Comparison between keys to soil taxonomy and WRB to classification of soils in Segzi Plain (Iran). Journal of Applied Sciences 2011, 11:579-583.
20. Namriah, Badayos R.B. The soil and land classification system of Munanese Farmers in Muna Island, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Philippine Agricultural Scientist 2007, 90:231-243.
21. Němeček J., Macků J., Vokoun J., Vavříček D., Novák P. Czech Taxonomic Classification System of Soils 2001, ČZU, in Czech, Praha.
22. Němeček J., Mühlhanselová M., Macků J., Vokoun J., Vavříček D., Novák P. Czech Taxonomic Classification System of Soils 2011, ČZU, Praha, in Czech.
23. Reintam E., Köster T. The role of chemical indicators to correlate some Estonian soils with WRB and Soil Taxonomy criteria. Geoderma 2006, 136:199-209.
24. Shi X.Z., Yu D.S., Warner E.D., Sun W.X., Petersen G.W., Gong Z.T. Crossreference system for translating between Genetic Soil Classification of China and Soil Taxonomy. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2006, 70:78-83.
25. Shi X.Z., Yu D.S., Xu S.X., Warner E.D., Wang H.J., Sun W.X., Zhao Y.C., Gong Z.T. Cross-reference for relating Genetic Soil Classification of China with WRB at different scales. Geoderma 2010, 155:344-350.
26. Soil Terminology and Correlation 2002, Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk. Second ed. S.A. Shoba (Ed.).
27. Smith G.D. Objectives and basic assumptions of the new classification system. Soil Science 1963, 96:6-16.
28. USDA-NRCS Soil Taxonomy. Agricultural Handbook No. 436 1999, USDA. second ed.
29. Vokoun J., Macků J. Classification System of Soils 1996, ÚHÚL, Brandỳs n.L, in Czech.