Understanding natural language commands for robotic navigation and mobile manipulation

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 1507-1514

  Tellex, Stefanie ^a   Kollar, Thomas ^a   Dickerson, Steven ^a   Walter, Matthew R ^a   Banerjee, Ashis Gopal ^a   Teller, Seth ^a   Roy, Nicholas ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS; COMPOSITIONAL SEMANTICS; CROWDSOURCING; FIXED STRUCTURE; MOBILE MANIPULATION; NATURAL LANGUAGES; NEW MODEL; PROBABILISTIC GRAPHICAL MODELS; REALISTIC ROBOTS; ROBOT ACTIONS; ROBOTIC NAVIGATION; SEMI-STRUCTURED ENVIRONMENTS; SEQUENCE OF ACTIONS; SYSTEM'S PERFORMANCE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; NAVIGATION; SEMANTICS;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS;

EID: 80055051329     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Andrew, G., and Gao, J. 2007. Scalable training of L1-regularized log-linear models. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML).
2. de Marneffe, M.; MacCartney, B.; and Manning, C. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 449-454.
3. Hsiao, K.; Tellex, S.; Vosoughi, S.; Kubat, R.; and Roy, D. Object schemas for grounding language in a responsive robot. Connection Science 20(4):253-276.
4. Jackendoff, R. S. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. MIT Press. 161-187.
5. Katz, B. 1988. Using English for indexing and retrieving. In Proc. Conf. on Adaptivity, Personilization and Fusion of Heterogeneous Information (RIAO). MIT Press.
6. Kollar, T.; Tellex, S.; Roy, D.; and Roy, N. 2010. Toward understanding natural language directions. In Proc. ACM/IEEE Int'l Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 259-266.
7. Lafferty, J. D.; McCallum, A.; and Pereira, F. C. N. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML), 282-289.
8. Landau, B., and Jackendoff, R. 1993. "What" and "where" in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:217-265.
9. Liang, P.; Jordan, M. L; and Klein, D. 2011. Learning dependency-based compositional semantics. In Proc. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
10. Matuszek, C.; Fox, D.; and Koscher, K. 2010. Following directions using statistical machine translation. In Proc. ACM/IEEE Int'l Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 251-258.
11. McCallum, A. K. 2002. MALLET: A machine learning for language toolkit, http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.
12. Regier, T., and Carlson, L. A. 2001. Grounding spatial language in perception: An empirical and computational investigation. J. of Experimental Psychology: General 130(2):273-98. (Pubitemid 33595902)
13. Shimizu, N., and Haas, A. 2009. Learning to follow navigational route instructions. In Proc. Int'l Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 1488-1493.
14. Talmy, L. 2005. The fundamental system of spatial schemas in language. In Hamp, B., ed., From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Teller, S.; Walter, M. R.; Antone, M.; Correa, A.; Davis, R.; Fletcher, L.; Frazzoli, E.; Glass, J.; How, J.; Huang, A.; Jeon, J.; Karaman, S.; Luders, B.; Roy, N.; and Sainath, T. 2010. A voice-commandable robotic forklift working alongside humans in minimally-prepared outdoor environments. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 526-533.
16. Tellex, S. 2010. Natural Language and Spatial Reasoning. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
17. Winograd, T. 1970. Procedures as a representation for data in a computer program for understanding natural language. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.