A quantum probability account of order effects in inference

Cognitive Science

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1518-1552

  Trueblood, Jennifer S ^a   Busemeyer, Jerome R ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Belief adjustment model; Inference; Jury decision making; Quantum probability theory; Recency effects

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; HUMAN; LEARNING; LOGIC; MENTAL FUNCTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

BAYES THEOREM; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; HUMANS; LOGIC; LOGISTIC MODELS; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROBABILITY LEARNING; PROBABILITY THEORY; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 80055035987     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01197.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aerts, D. (2009). Quantum structure in cognition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 314-348.
2. Aerts, D., & Aerts, S. (1994). Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes. Foundations of Science, 1, 85-97.
3. Anderson, N. H., & Hubert, S. (1963). Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 379-391.
4. Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T., & Romer, H. (2004). Quantum zero features of bistable perception. Biological Cybernetics, 90, 33-40.
5. Bergus, G. R., Chapman, G. B., Levy, B. T., Ely, J. W., & Oppliger, R. A. (1998). Clinical diagnosis and order of information. Medical Decision Making, 18, 412-417.
6. Browne, M. W. (2000). Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 108-132.
7. Busemeyer, J. R., Pothos, E., Franco, R., & Trueblood, J. S. (2011). A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. Psychological Review, 118, 193-218.
8. Busemeyer, J. R., & Wang, Y. (2000). Model comparisons and model selections based on the generalization criterion methodology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 171-189.
9. Franco, R. (2009). The conjunctive fallacy and interference effects. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 415-422.
10. Furnham, A. (1986). The robustness of the recency effect: Studies using legal evidence. Journal of General Psychology, 113, 351-357.
11. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Hammeroff, S. R. (1998). Quantum computation in brain microtubles? The penrose-hameroff ''orch or'' model of consciousness. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London (A), 356, 1869-1896.
13. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
14. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1-55.
15. Khrennikov, A. Y. (2004). Information dynamics in cognitive, psychological, social and anomalous phenomena. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
16. McKenzie, C. R. M., Lee, S. M., & Chen, K. K. (2002). When negative evidence increases confidence: Change in belief after hearing two sides of a dispute. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 1-18.
17. Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2000). Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2009). A quantum probability explanation for violations of "rational" decision theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276(1165), 2171-2178.
19. Pribram, K. H. (1993). Rethinking neural networks: Quantum fields and biological data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Shanteau, J. C. (1970). An additive model for sequential decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 181-191.
21. Shiffrin, R., Lee, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Kim, W. (2008). A survey of model evaluation approaches with a focus on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cognitive Science, 32, 1248-1284.
22. Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992). The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science, 3, 305-309.
23. Walker, L., Thibaut, J., & Andreoli, V. (1972). Order of presentation at trial. Yale Law Journal, 82, 216-226.