Dynamic resource allocation in conservation planning

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 1331-1336

  Golovin, Daniel ^a   Krause, Andreas ^b   Gardner, Beth ^c   Converse, Sarah J ^d   Morey, Steve ^e  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^e U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; DYNAMIC RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS; EFFICIENT ALGORITHM; ENDANGERED SPECIES; NEAR-OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE; PACIFIC NORTHWEST; RARE SPECIES; RESERVE DESIGN; SEQUENTIAL OPTIMIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; OPTIMIZATION;

CONSERVATION;

EID: 80055034198     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ball, I.; Possingham, H.; and Watts, M. 2009. Spatial conservation prioritisation: Quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press. chapter Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritisation.
2. Bateni, M. H.; Hajiaghayi, M.; and Zadimoghaddam, M. 2010. The submodular secretary problem and its extensions. In APPROX.
3. Environmental Systems Research Institute. 2008. ArcGIS 9.3 users manual. Technical report, ESRI.
4. Goldenberg, J.; Libai, B.; and Muller, E. 2001. Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters 12(3):211-223. (Pubitemid 33686497)
5. Golovin, D., and Krause, A. 2010. Adaptive submodularity: Theory and applications in active learning and stochastic optimization. CoRR abs/1003.3967v3.
6. Gomes, R., and Krause, A. 2010. Budgeted nonparametric learning from data streams. In ICML.
7. Goundan, P. R., and Schulz, A. S. 2007. Revisiting the greedy approach to submodular set function maximization. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
8. Hanski, I. A.; Moilanen, A.; Pakkala, T.; and Kuussaari, M. 1996. The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation. Conservation Biology 10.
9. Koller, D., and Friedman, N. 2009. Probabilistic Graphical Models. The MIT Press.
10. Leskovec, J.; Krause, A.; Guestrin, C.; Faloutsos, C.; VanBriesen, J.; and Glance, N. 2007. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. In KDD.
11. Moilanen, A., and Kujala, H. 2008. ZONATION: Spatial conservation planning framework and software. www.helsinki.fi/bioscience/ConsPlan.
12. Nemhauser, G. L.; Wolsey, L. A.; and Fisher, M. L. 1978. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions - I. Math. Prog. 14(1):265-294.
13. Sheldon, D.; Dilkina, B.; Elmachtoub, A.; Finseth, R.; Sabharwal, A.; Conrad, J.; Gomes, C.; Shmoys, D.; Allen, W.; Amundsen, O.; and Vaughan, B. 2010. Maximizing the spread of cascades using network design. In UAI.
14. Streeter, M., and Golovin, D. 2008. An online algorithm for maximizing submodular functions. In NIPS.
15. Sviridenko, M. 2004. A note on maximizing a submodular set function subject to knapsack constraint. Operations Research Letters 32:41-43.
16. Vose, D. 1996. Quantitative Risk Analysis: A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation Modeling. John Wiley and Son.