More effective assessment of adverse effects and comorbidities in epilepsy: Results of a Phase II communication study

Epilepsy and Behavior

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 552-556

  Stern, John M ^a   Labiner, David M ^b   Gilliam, Frank G ^c   Penovich, Patricia E ^d   Onofrey, Meaghan ^e   Eagan, Corey A ^e   Holmes, Gregory L ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d MINNESOTA EPILEPSY GROUP   (United States)

^e Ogilvy CommonHealth Insights and Analytics   (United States)

^f DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Communication; Comorbidities; Dialogue; Epilepsy; Linguistics; Misalignment; Mood; Side effects

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE DRUG REACTION; ADVERSE EVENT PROFILE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMORBIDITY; EPILEPSY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOOD; NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER DEPRESSION INVENTORY FOR EPILEPSY; PATIENT; PHYSICIAN; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTICONVULSANTS; CLINICAL TRIALS, PHASE II AS TOPIC; COMMUNICATION; DEPRESSION; EPILEPSY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80055018368     PISSN: 15255050     EISSN: 15255069     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Glauser T.A., Sankar R. Core elements of epilepsy diagnosis and management: expert consensus from the Leadership in Epilepsy, Advocacy, and Development (LEAD) faculty. Curr Med Res Opin 2008, 24:2463-2477.
2. French J. The long-term therapeutic management of epilepsy. Ann Intern Med 1994, 120:411-422.
3. Gilliam F.G., Hecimovic H., Sheline Y. Psychiatric comorbidity, health, and function in epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2003, 4:S26-S30.
4. Uijl S.G., Uiterwaal C.S., Aldenkamp A.P., et al. A cross-sectional study of subjective complaints in patients with epilepsy who seem to be well-controlled with anti-epileptic drugs. Seizure 2006, 15:242-248.
5. Perucca P., Carter J., Vahle V., Gilliam F.G. Adverse antiepileptic drug effects: toward a clinically and neurobiologically relevant taxonomy. Neurology 2009, 72:1223-1229.
6. Perucca E., Meador K.J. Side effects of antiepileptic drugs. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 2005, 181:30-35.
7. Auriel E., Landov H., Blatt I., et al. Quality of life in seizure-free patients with epilepsy on monotherapy. Epilepsy Behav 2009, 14:130-133.
8. Hovinga C.A., Asato M.R., Manjunath R., et al. Association of non-adherence to antiepileptic drugs and seizures, quality of life, and productivity: survey of patients with epilepsy and physicians. Epilepsy Behav 2008, 13:316-322.
9. Gilliam F., Penovich P., Eagan C.A., et al. Conversations between community-based neurologists and patients with epilepsy: results of an observational linguistic study. Epilepsy Behav 2009, 16:315-320.
10. Baker G.A., Jacoby A., Francis P., Chadwick D.W. The Liverpool Adverse Drug Events Profile. Epilepsia 1995, 36(Suppl. 3):S59.
11. Gilliam F.G., Barry J.J., Hermann B.P., Meador K.J., Vahle V., Kanner A.M. Rapid detection of major depression in epilepsy: a multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 2006, 5:399-405.
12. Davidson B., Blum D., Cella D., Hamilton H., Nail L., Waltzman R. Communicating about chemotherapy-induced anemia. J Support Oncol 2007, 5:36-40. 46.
13. Nelson M., Hamilton H. Improving in-office discussions of chronic pulmonary disease: results and recommendations from an in-office linguistic study of COPD. Am J Med 2007, 120:S28-S32.
14. Hahn S.R., Lipton R.B., Sheftell F.D., et al. Healthcare professional-patient communication and migraine assessment: results of the American Migraine Communication Study Phase II. Curr Med Res Opin 2008, 24:1711-1718.
15. Heritage J. Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analyzing data. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice 1997, 161-182. Sage, London. D. Silverman (Ed.).
16. Gumperz J.J. On interactional sociolinguistic method. Talk, work and institutional order. discourse in medical, mediation and management settings 1999, 453-471. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. S. Sarangi, C. Roberts (Eds.).
17. Johnstone B. Qualitative methods in sociolinguistics 2000, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
18. Ainsworth-Vaughn N. The discourse of medical encounters. The handbook of discourse analysis 2001, 453-469. Blackwell, Malden, MA. D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, H.E. Hamilton (Eds.).
19. Herzmark G. Reactions of patients to video recording of consultations in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985, 291:315-317.
20. Redman S., Dickinson J.A., Cockburn J., Hennrickus D., Sanson-Fisher R.W. The assessment of reactivity in direct observation studies of doctor-patient interactions. Psychol Health 1989, 3:17-28.
21. Pringle M., Stewart-Evans C. Does awareness of being video-recorded affect doctors' consultation behavior?. Br J Gen Pract 1990, 40:455-458.
22. Speer S., Hutchby I. From ethics to analytics: aspects of participants' orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices. Sociology 2003, 37:315-337.