Performance evaluation and calibration of soil water content and potential sensors for agricultural soils in eastern Colorado

Agricultural Water Management

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 93-106

  Varble, J L ^a   Chavez J L ^a  

^a Engineering Research Center and Hydraulics Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Irrigation monitoring; Soil moisture determination; Soil water sensor calibration; Water management

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL SOILS; BULK SOILS; CALIBRATION EQUATIONS; CALIBRATION PROCESS; CAMPBELL; CLAY LOAM SOILS; DIHYDRATES; DIURNAL FLUCTUATIONS; FIELD CAPACITY; FIELD CONDITIONS; FIELD DATA; FIELD TEST; GRAVIMETRIC SAMPLES; LINEAR CALIBRATION; LOAMY SAND; LOGARITHMIC EQUATIONS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PERMANENT WILTING POINTS; POTENTIAL SENSOR; SANDY CLAY LOAM; SENSOR CALIBRATION; SENSOR READINGS; SOIL TEMPERATURE; SOIL TYPES; SOIL WATER CONTENT; SOIL WATER POTENTIAL; SOIL WATER SENSOR CALIBRATION; VOLUMETRIC WATER CONTENT;

CALCIUM CHLORIDE; CALIBRATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ERRORS; FORESTRY; MOISTURE CONTROL; MOISTURE DETERMINATION; SENSORS; SOIL MOISTURE; TEMPERATURE; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATERMARKING;

WATER CONTENT;

AGRICULTURAL SOIL; CALIBRATION; CLAY LOAM; ERROR ANALYSIS; FIELD CAPACITY; FIELD METHOD; GRAVIMETRY; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; LABORATORY METHOD; MONITORING SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SENSOR; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL TEMPERATURE; SOIL TYPE; SOIL WATER; WATER CONTENT; WATER MANAGEMENT;

COLORADO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80055014223     PISSN: 03783774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Acclima, 2008. SDI-12 Soil Moisture Transducer. Acclima, Inc., Meridian, ID. Revision 6. Available online at: (verified 14 Mar. 2011). http://acclima.com/wd/acclimadocs/agriculture/SDI-12%20Sensor%20User%20Manual.pdf.
2. Acclima, 2010. Cut Sheet, TDT Soil Moisture Sensor. Acclima, Inc., Meridian, ID. Revision 3/10. Available online at: (verified 14 Mar. 2011). http://acclima.com/wd/acclimadocs/Moisture%20Sensor/TDT%20Moisture%20Sensor%20Cut%20Sheet.pdf.
3. Benson C., Wang X. Temperature-compensating calibration procedure for water content reflectometers. Proceedings TDR 2006: 3rd International Symposium and Workshop on Time Domain Reflectometry for Innovative Soils Applications 2006, 5-1-50-16.
4. Blonquist J.M., Jones S.B., Robinson D.A. A time domain transmission sensor with TDR performance characteristics. J. Hydrol. 2005, 314:235-245.
5. Blonquist J.M., Jones S.B., Robinson D.A. Standardizing characterization of electromagnetic water content sensors: Part 2. Evaluation of seven sensing systems. Vadose Zone J. 2005, 4:1059-1069.
6. Campbell Scientific, 2009. Instruction Manual: Models 253-L and 257-L (Watermark 200) Soil Matric Potential Sensors. Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan, UT. Revision 3/09. Available online at: (verified 13 Feb. 2011). http://www.campbellsci.com/documents/manuals/253-257.pdf.
7. Campbell Scientific, 2010. Campbell Update, Vol. 21, Issue 4. Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan, UT. Available online at: (verified 14 Mar. 2011). http://www.campbellsci.com/documents/newsletters/news-2010-q4.pdf.
8. Campbell Scientific, 2011. CS616 and CS625 Water Content Reflectometer. Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan, UT. Revision 1/11. Available online at: (verified 13 Feb. 2011). http://www.campbellsci.com/documents/manuals/cs616.pdf.
9. Chandler D.G., Seyfried M., Murdock M., McNamara J. Field calibration of water content reflectometers. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2004, 68:1501-1507.
10. 2O Soil Moisture Sensors 2010, Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA, Available online at:, (verified 13 Feb. 2011). http://www.decagon.com/assets/Uploads/13393-04-CalibratingECH2OSoilMoistureProbes.pdf.
11. Cooley H., Christian-Smith J., Gleick P.H. Sustaining California Agriculture in an Uncertain Future 2009, Pacific Institute, Oakland, CA, Available online at:, (verified 7 Jan. 2011). http://www.pacinst.org/reports/california_agriculture/.
12. Czarnomski N.M., Moore G.W., Pypker T.G., Licata J., Bond B.J. Precision and accuracy of three alternative instruments for measuring soil water content in two forest soils of the Pacific Northwest. Can. J. For. Res. 2005, 35:1867-1876.
13. Decagon Devices, 2010. 5TE Operator's Manual. Version 5. Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA. Available online at: (verified 13 Feb. 2011). http://www.decagon.com/assets/Manuals/5TE-Manual.pdf.
14. Evett, S., Schwartz, R.C., Mazahrih, N.Th., Jitan, M.A., Shaqir, I.M. Soil water sensors for irrigation scheduling: can they deliver a management allowed depletion? Acta Hort. (ISHS) 888:231-237.
15. Fangmeier D.D., William J.E., Workman S.R., Huffman R.L., Schwab G.O. Soil and Water Conservation Engineering 2006, Thomson Delmar Learning, Clifton Park, NY, p. 337. 5th ed.
16. Gavlak R.G., Horneck D.A., Miller R.O. Plant, Soil and Water Reference Methods for the Western Region 2003, WREP 125. 2nd ed.
17. Heng L.K., Evett S. Tensiometers. Field Estimation of Soil Water Content: A Practical Guide to Methods, Instrumentation, and Sensor Technology. IAEA-TCS-30 2008, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, ISSN 1018-5518. S.R. Evett, L.K. Heng, P. Moutonnet, M.L. Nguyen (Eds.).
18. Hignett C., Evett S. Direct and surrogate measures of soil water content. Field Estimation of Soil Water Content: A Practical Guide to Methods, Instrumentation, and Sensor Technology. IAEA-TCS-30 2008, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, ISSN 1018-5518. S.R. Evett, L.K. Heng, P. Moutonnet, M.L. Nguyen (Eds.).
19. Hignett C., Evett S. Electrical resistance sensors for soil water tension estimates. Field Estimation of Soil Water Content: A Practical Guide to Methods, Instrumentation, and Sensor Technology. IAEA-TCS-30 2008, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, ISSN 1018-5518. S.R. Evett, L.K. Heng, P. Moutonnet, M.L. Nguyen (Eds.).
20. Hillel D. Environmental Soil Physics 1998, Academic Press, London, UK, p. 156.
21. Irrometer Company Inc., 2009. WATERMARK Soil Moisture Sensor with Voltage Output-MODEL 200SS-V. #405. Riverside, CA. Available online at: (verified 13 Feb. 2011). http://www.irrometer.com/datasheets/405.pdf.
22. Kapinos, J., 2006. Irrigation Sensors Benefit Afghanistan Farmers. United States Air Force, 455th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs. Camp Cunningham, Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan. Available online at: (verified 13 Feb. 2011). http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123029019.
23. Kelleners T.J., Paige G.B., Gray S.T. Measurement of the dielectric properties of Wyoming soils using electromagnetic sensors. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009, 73(5):1626-1637.
24. Leib B.G., Matthews G. The relative accuracy of soil moisture sensors used in Washington State. ASAE/CSAE/SCGR Annual International Meeting 1999.
25. Ley T.W., Stevens R.G., Topielec R.R., Neibling W.H. Soil Water Monitoring and Measurement. PNW 475, A Pacific Northwest Publication 1994, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, Available online at:, (verified 13 Feb. 2011). http://cru.cahe.wsu.edu/CEPublications/pnw0475/pnw0475OP.html.
26. Logsdon S.D., Hornbuckle B. Soil moisture probes for dispersive soils. TDR 2006: Third International Symposium and Workshop on Time Domain Reflectometry for Innovative Soils Applications 2006, Available online at:, (verified 5 Jan. 2011). https://engineering.purdue.edu/TDR/Papers/13_Paper.pdf.
27. Logsdon S.D. Water content reflectometer calibration, field versus laboratory. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009, 73(1):1-6.
28. Morgan K.T., Parsons L.R., Wheaton T.A. Comparison of laboratory- and field-derived soil water retention curves for a fine sand soil using tensiometric, resistance and capacitance methods. Plant Soil 2001, 234:153-157.
29. National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), 2009. Agricultural Water Enhancement Program Project Proposals Approved for Fiscal Year 2009. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Available online at: (verified 13 Feb. 2011). http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/awep/2009projects.html.
30. Plauborg F., Iversen B.V., Lærke P.E. In situ comparison of three dielectric soil moisture sensors in drip irrigated sandy soils. Vadose Zone J. 2005, 4:1037-1047.
31. 2O EC-5, TE, and 5TE sensors in dielectric liquids. Vadose Zone J. 2010, 9:181-186.
32. Ruelle P., Laurent J.P. CS616 (CS615) water content reflectometers. Field Estimation of Soil Water Content: A Practical Guide to Methods, Instrumentation, and Sensor Technology. IAEA-TCS-30 2008, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, ISSN 1018-5518. S.R. Evett, L.K. Heng, P. Moutonnet, M.L. Nguyen (Eds.).
33. Schaap M.G., Leij F.J. Database related accuracy and uncertainty of pedotransfer functions. Soil Sci. 1998, 163:765-779.
34. Seyfried M.S., Murdock M.D. Response of a new soil water sensor to variable soil, water content, and temperature. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2001, 65:28-34.
35. Starr J.L., Paltineanu I.C. Methods for measurement of soil water content: capacitance devices. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4 Physical Methods 2002, 463-474. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. J.H. Dane, G.C. Topp (Eds.).
36. Topp G.C., David J.L., Annan A.P. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurement in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resour. Res. 1980, 16(3):574-582.
37. van Genuchten M.Th. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1980, 44:892-898.
38. Walker J.P., Willgoose G.R., Kalma J.D. In situ measurement of soil moisture: a comparison of techniques. J. Hydrol. 2004, 293:85-99.
39. Western A.W., Seyfried M.S. A calibration and temperature correction procedure for the water-content reflectometer. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19:3785-3793.
40. Willmott C.J. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1982, 63:1309-1313.