Differentiating between types and levels of isokinetic knee musculature efforts

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 974-981

  Almosnino, Sivan ^a,b   Stevenson, Joan M ^a,b   Day, Andrew G ^b   Bardana, Davide D ^b   Diaconescu, Elena D ^b   Dvir, Zeevi ^a,c  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b KINGSTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cross correlation; Isokinetic; Monte Carlo; Muscle; Sincerity; Strength; Submaximal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCENTRIC MUSCLE CONTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE MUSCLE; LEG MUSCLE; MALE; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PHYSICAL EXERTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054981543     PISSN: 10506411     EISSN: 18735711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Almosnino S., Kajaks T., Costigan P.A. The free moment in walking and its change with foot rotation angle. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2009, 1:19.
2. Ayalon M., Rubinstein M., Barak Y., Dunsky A., Ben-Sira D. Identification of feigned strength test of the knee extensors and flexors based on the shape of the isokinetic torque curve. Isokinet Exerc Sci 2001, 9:45-50.
3. Ayalon M., Barak Y., Rubinstein M. Qualitative analysis of the isokinetic moment curve of the knee extensors. Isokinet Exerc Sci 2002, 10:145-151.
4. Birmingham T.B., Kramer J.F. Identifying submaximal muscular effort: reliability of difference scores calculated from isometric and isokinetic measurements. Percept Mot Skills 1998, 87:1183-1191.
5. Birmingham T.B., Kramer J.F., Speechley M., Chesworth B.M., MacDermid J. Measurement variability and sincerity of effort: clinical utility of isokinetic strength coefficient of variation scores. Ergonomics 1998, 41:853-863.
6. Bohannon R., Smith M. Differentiation of maximal from submaximal knee extension efforts by isokinetic testing. Clin Biomech 1988, 3:215-218.
7. Brett A.S., Phillips M., Beary J.F. Predictive power of the polygraph: can the " lie detector" really detect liars?. Lancet 1986, 1:544-547.
8. David G., Dvir Z., Mackintosh S., Brien C. Validity study of a novel protocol for the identification of submaximal effort. Isokinet Exerc Sci 1996, 6:139-144.
9. Derrick TR, Thomas JM. Time series analysis: the cross-correlation function. In: Stergiou N, editor. Innovative analysis of human movement. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2004. p. 189-205.
10. Dvir Z. Isokinetics: muscle testing interpretation and clinical applications 2004, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p. 189-205. 2nd ed.
11. Dvir Z., David G. Suboptimal muscular performance: measuring isokinetic strength of knee extensors with new testing protocol. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996, 77:578-581.
12. Hazard R.G., Reid S., Fenwick J., Reeves V. Isokinetic trunk and lifting strength measurements: variability as an indicator of effort. Spine 1988, 13:54-57.
13. Lechner D.E., Bradbury S.F., Bradley L.A. Detecting sincerity of effort: a summary of methods and approaches. Phys Ther 1998, 78:867-888.
14. Lin P.C., Robinson M.E., Carlos J., O'Connor P. Detection of submaximal effort in isometric and isokinetic knee extension tests. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996, 24:19-24.
15. Miller R.H., Caldwell G.E., Van Emmerick R.E., Umberger B.R., Hamill J. Ground reaction forces and lower extremity kinematics when running with suppressed arm swing. J Biomech Eng 2009, 131:124502.
16. Mullineaux D.R., Bartlett R.M., Bennett S. Research design and statistics in biomechanics and motor control. J Sports Sci 2001, 19:739-760.
17. Oda S., Moritani T. Interlimb co-ordination of force and movement-related cortical potentials. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1996, 74:8-12.
18. Reid S., Hazard R.G., Fenwick J. Isokinetic trunk strength deficits in people with and without low back pain: a comparative study with consideration of effort. J Spinal Disord 1991, 4:68-72.
19. Robinson M.E., Dannecker E.A. Critical issues in the use of muscle testing for the determination of sincerity of effort. Clin J Pain 2004, 20:392-398.
20. Robinson M.E., O'Connor P.D., Riley J.L., Kvaal S., Shirley F.R. Variability of isometric and isotonic leg exercise: utility for detection of submaximal effort. J Occup Rehabil 1994, 4:163-169.
21. Robinson M.E., Sadler I.J., O'Connor P.D., Riley J.L. Detection of submaximal effort and assessment of stability of coefficient of variation. J Occup Rehabil 1997, 7:207-215.
22. Shechtman O., Anton S.D., Kanasky W.F., Robinson M.E. The use of the coefficient of variation in detecting sincerity of effort: a meta-analysis. Work 2006, 26:335-341.
23. Shechtman O., Hope L.M., Sindhu B.S. Evaluation of the torque-velocity test of the BTE-Primus as a measure of sincerity of effort. J Hand Ther 2007, 20:326-334.
24. Umberger B.R. Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematic, kinetics and energetic of human walking. J Biomech 2008, 41:2575-2580.