Effectiveness of surgical and postsurgical interventions for the subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 92, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1900-1913

  Gebremariam, Lukas ^a   Hay, Elaine M ^b   Koes, Bart W ^a   Huisstede, Bionka M ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

General surgery; Rehabilitation; Shoulder; Shoulder impingement syndrome; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

KETOPROFEN; PLACEBO; ROPIVACAINE;

ADD ON THERAPY; ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY; CALCIFICATION; CAUTERIZATION; CINAHL; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DECOMPRESSION; EMBASE; GEL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEUKOCYTE; LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TENDINITIS; TENOTOMY; THROMBOCYTE;

ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS, NON-STEROIDAL; ARTHROSCOPY; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; HUMANS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80054970501     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.006     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. B.M. Huisstede, H.S. Miedema, A.P. Verhagen, B.W. Koes, and J.A. Verhaar Multidisciplinary consensus on the terminology and classification of complaints of the arm, neck and/or shoulder Occup Environ Med 64 2007 313 319 (Pubitemid 46717708)
2. B.M. Huisstede, H.A. Wijnhoven, S.M. Bierma-Zeinstra, B.W. Koes, J.A. Verhaar, and S. Picavet Prevalence and characteristics of complaints of the arm, neck, and/or shoulder (CANS) in the open population Clin J Pain 24 2008 253 259 (Pubitemid 351640924)
3. A. Feleus, S.M. Bierma-Zeinstra, H.S. Miedema, J.A. Verhaar, and B.W. Koes Management in non-traumatic arm, neck and shoulder complaints: differences between diagnostic groups Eur Spine J 17 2008 1218 1229
4. R.M. van Rijn, B.M. Huisstede, B.W. Koes, and A. Burdorf Associations between work-related factors and specific disorders of the shoulder - a systematic literature review of the literature Scand J Work Environ Health 36 2010 189 201
5. C.S. Neer 2nd Impingement lesions Clin Orthop Relat Res 173 1983 70 77 (Pubitemid 13115029)
6. M.C. Koester, M.S. George, and J.E. Kuhn Shoulder impingement syndrome Am J Med 118 2005 452 455 (Pubitemid 40615465)
7. H.B. Park, A. Yokota, H.S. Gill, G. El Rassi, and E.G. McFarland Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 2005 1446 1455 (Pubitemid 40917743)
8. L. Silva, J.L. Andréu, and P. Muoz Accuracy of physical examination in subacromial impingement syndrome Rheumatology (Oxford) 47 2008 679 683 (Pubitemid 351619212)
9. A. Taheriazam, M. Sadatsafavi, and A. Moayyeri Outcome predictors in nonoperative management of newly diagnosed subacromial impingement syndrome: a longitudinal study MedGenMed 7 2005 63
10. A. Bartolozzi, D. Andreychik, and S. Ahmad Determinants of outcome in the treatment of rotator cuff disease Clin Orthop Relat Res 308 1994 90 97 (Pubitemid 24349315)
11. J.A. Coghlan, R. Buchbinder, S. Green, R.V. Johnston, and S.N. Bell Surgery for rotator cuff disease Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 2008 Jan 23 CD005619
12. A.D. Furlan, V. Pennick, C. Bombardier, M. van Tulder Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 2009 1929 1941
13. M. van Tulder, A. Furlan, C. Bombardier, and L. Bouter Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 2003 1290 1299 (Pubitemid 36734620)
14. H. Rahme, E. Solem-Bertoft, C.E. Westerberg, E. Lundberg, S. Sörensen, and S. Hilding The subacromial impingement syndrome A study of results of treatment with special emphasis on predictive factors and pain-generating mechanisms Scand J Rehabil Med 30 1998 253 262 (Pubitemid 28505829)
15. J.I. Brox, P.H. Staff, A.E. Ljunggren, and J.I. Brevik Arthroscopic surgery compared with supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome) BMJ 307 1993 899 903 (Pubitemid 23293502)
16. J.P. Haahr, S. Østergaard, and J. Dalsgaard Exercises versus arthroscopic decompression in patients with subacromial impingement: a randomised, controlled study in 90 cases with a one year follow up Ann Rheum Dis 64 2005 760 764 (Pubitemid 40559305)
17. T. Husby, J.R. Haugstvedt, M. Brandt, I. Holm, and H. Steen Open versus arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a prospective, randomized study of 34 patients followed for 8 years Acta Orthop Scand 74 2003 408 414 (Pubitemid 37108458)
18. L. T'Jonck, R. Lysens, and L. De Smet Open versus arthroscopic subacromial decompression: analysis of one-year results Physiother Res Int 2 1997 46 61
19. R.A. Sachs, M.L. Stone, and S. Devine Open vs. arthroscopic acromioplasty: a prospective, randomized study Arthroscopy 10 1994 248 254 (Pubitemid 24164435)
20. T. Iversen, O. Reikeras, and O.I. Solem Acromion resection for shoulder impingement syndrome Results after an open and a percutaneous surgical method [Norwegian] Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 116 1996 1879 1882
21. M.J. Spangehl, R.H. Hawkins, R.G. McCormack, and R.L. Loomer Arthroscopic versus open acromioplasty: a prospective, randomized, blinded study J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 2002 101 107 (Pubitemid 36904163)
22. T. Ingvarrson, G. Hagglund, and R. Johnsson Anterior acromioplasty A comparison of two techniques Int Orthop 20 1996 290 292 (Pubitemid 26377286)
23. F. Rubenthaler, J. Ludwig, M. Wiese, and R.H. Wittenberg Prospective randomized surgical treatments for calcifying tendinopathy Clin Orthop Relat Res 410 2003 278 284 (Pubitemid 36538573)
24. M.A. Murphy, N.M. Maze, J.L. Boyd, D.C. Quick, and D.D. Buss Cost-benefit comparison: holmium laser versus electrocautery in arthroscopic acromioplasty J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8 1999 275 278
25. E. Taverna, F. Battistella, V. Sansone, C. Perfetti, and J.P. Tasto Radiofrequency-based plasma microtenotomy compared with arthroscopic subacromial decompression yields equivalent outcomes for rotator cuff tendinosis Arthroscopy 23 2007 1042 1051 (Pubitemid 47488738)
26. P.A. Everts, R.J. Devilee, and C. Brown Mahoney Exogenous application of platelet-leukocyte gel during open subacromial decompression contributes to improved patient outcome A prospective randomized double-blind study Eur Surg Res 40 2008 203 210 (Pubitemid 351252929)
27. I. Hultenheim Klintberg, A.C. Gunnarsson, J. Styf, and J. Karlsson Early activation or a more protective regime after arthroscopic subacromial decompression - a description of clinical changes with two different physiotherapy treatment protocols - a prospective, randomized pilot study with a two-year follow-up Clin Rehabil 22 2008 951 965
28. C. Hoe-Hansen, and R. Norlin The clinical effect of ketoprofen after arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a randomized double-blind prospective study Arthroscopy 15 1999 249 252 (Pubitemid 29238796)
29. T. Jarvela, and S. Jarvela Long-term effect of the use of a pain pump after arthroscopic subacromial decompression Arthroscopy 24 2008 1402 1406
30. M. Lindh, and R. Norlin Arthroscopic subacromial decompression versus open acromioplasty A two-year follow-up study Clin Orthop Relat Res 290 1993 174 176 (Pubitemid 23139596)