Legal and Ethical Issues Regarding Social Media and Pharmacy Education

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 74, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Cain, Jeff ^a   Cain, Joseph L ^a  

^a University of Kentucky   (United States)

Author keywords

eprofessionalism; ethics; law; social media; technology

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADVERSE DRUG REACTION; ARTICLE; COURT; HUMAN; LAW; PHARMACY (DISCIPLINE); PHARMACY EDUCATION; SIDE EFFECT; SOCIAL MEDIA; STUDENT ATTITUDE; EDUCATION; ETHICS; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; PHARMACY STUDENT; STUDENT;

EDUCATION, PHARMACY; ETHICS, PHARMACY; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; STUDENTS; STUDENTS, PHARMACY;

EID: 80054951878     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj7410184     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Perez S. As Facebook ages, Gen Y turns to Twitter. http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/as_facebook_ages_gen_y_turns_to_twitter.php. Accessed September 1, 2010.
2. Statistics: Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics. Accessed September 1, 2010.
3. Duncan, S.H., Education law – from armbands and MySpace to cell phones: interesting school law cases across the country. KY Bench and Bar 72:Nov (2008), 20–24.
4. Article 10Cain, J., Online social networking issues within academia and pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ, 72(1), 2008.
5. US Const amend I.
6. Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 US 503 (1969).
7. US 675 (1986).
8. US Const amend IV.
9. US Const amend V.
10. US Const amend XIV § 1.
11. 2009 US Dist LEXIS 67241 WD Ky 2009.
12. 2008 US Dist LEXIS 97943 ED Pa 2008.
13. 496 F Supp 2d 587 WD Pa, 2007.
14. 593 F 3d 249 3d Cir, 2010.
15. 2010 US Appeals LEXIS 7362, April 9, 2010.
16. 2008 US Dist LEXIS 72685 M.D.Pa. 2008.
17. 2010 US App LEXIS 2388 3d Cir 2010.
18. 2010 US App 7342 3d Cir 2010.
19. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, Model State Pharmacy Act, August 2009. http://www.nabp.net/publications/assets/2009%20Model%20Act.doc. Accessed September 1, 2010.
20. NABP Model Act §302(a)(3).
21. NABP Model Act §302(a)(3). Comment.
22. NABP Model Act §303.
23. NABP Model Act §§308 and 309.
24. NABP Model Act §402(a)(3)(ii).
25. Fink, J.L. III, Liability of faculty members in colleges of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ 46:3 (1982), 223–226.
26. 1AKornblum, J., Marklein, M.B., What you say online could haunt you. USA Today, March 9, 2006.
27. Van Der Werf, M., Beware of using social-networking site to monitor students, lawyers say. Chron High Educ, 53(26), 2007, A28.
28. Steinbach S, Deavers L. The brave new world of MySpace and Facebook. Inside High Educ. http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/print/views/2007/04/03/steinbach. Accessed May 22, 2007.
29. US v Maxwell, 45 MJ 406 (CAAF 1996).
30. US v Charbonneau, 979 F Supp 1177 (SD Ohio 1997).
31. Hodge MJ. Comment: the Fourth Amendment and privacy issues on the “new” Internet: Facebook.com and MySpace.com. 31 S Ill ULJ 95 2006.
32. PL 104–191.
33. PL 111–115.
34. Colaizzi M. Despite regulation, cool things are brewing in healthcare and finance. http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2010/02/08/despite-regulation-cool-things-are-brewing-in-healthcare-and-finance/. Accessed September 1, 2010.
35. 20 USC §1232(g).
36. APhA Code of Ethics for Pharmacists. http://www.pharmacist.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Search1%26template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm%26ContentID=2903. Accessed September 1, 2010.
37. APhA-ASP/AACP Pledge of Professionalism. http://www.aacp.org/resources/academicpolicies/studentaffairspolicies/Documents/pledgeprofessionalism.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2010.
38. Boyd D. Social network sites: public, private, or what? The Knowledge Tree. 2007;13(May)28. http://kt.flexiblelearning.net.au/tkt2007/?page_id528. Accessed August 27, 2010.
39. Cain, J., Romanelli, F., E-professionalism: a new paradigm for a digital age. Currents Pharm Teach Learn 1:2 (2009), 66–70.