Influence of Oscillating Flow on Hyporheic Zone Development

Ground Water

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 830-844

  Maier, Herb S ^a   Howard, Ken W F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC HABITATS; FLOW PATH; GRADUAL CHANGES; HYDROLOGICAL EVENTS; HYPORHEIC; HYPORHEIC ZONE; LIVING CONDITIONS; MODEL RESULTS; ONTARIO; RAPID CHANGES; RESIDENCE TIME; SHALLOW SUBSURFACE; STEADY-STATE CONDITION; STEADY-STATE MODELS; STREAM CHANNELS; STREAMBEDS; SURFACE WATER BODY; TRANSIENT FLOW; TRANSIENT FLOW CONDITIONS;

RIVERS; STREAM FLOW; TRANSITION FLOW;

OSCILLATING FLOW;

GROUND WATER;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; DATA SET; ECOTONE; FLOW PATTERN; HYDROLOGICAL REGIME; HYPORHEIC ZONE; NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT; OSCILLATING FLOW; RIFFLE; STEADY-STATE EQUILIBRIUM; STREAM CHANNEL; SURFACE WATER; WATER FLOW;

ARTICLE; CANADA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METHODOLOGY; WATER FLOW;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GROUNDWATER; ONTARIO; WATER MOVEMENTS;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

EID: 80054923534     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00794.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arrigoni, A.S., G.C. Poole, L.A.K. Mertes, S.J. O'Daniel, W.W. Woessner, and S.A. Thomas 2008. Buffered, lagged, or cooled? Disentangling hyporheic influences on temperature cycles in stream channels. Water Resources Research 44: W09418. DOI:10.1029/2007WR006480.
2. Bencala, K.E. 2000. Hyporheic zone hydrological processes. Hydrological Processes 14, no. 15: 2797-2798.
3. Blaschke, A.P., K.H. Steiner, R. Schmalfuss, D. Gutknecht, and D. Sengschmitt 2003. Clogging processes in hyporheic interstices of an impounded river, the Danube at Vienna, Austria. International Review of Hydrobiology 88, no. 3-4: 397-413.
4. Boulton, A.J., and E.H. Stanley 1995. Hyporheic processes during flooding and drying of a Sonoran Desert stream. II. Faunal dynamics. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 134, no. 1: 27-52.
5. Brunke, M., and T. Gonser 1997. The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biology 37, no. 1: 1-33.
6. Cardenas, M.B. 2009. Stream-aquifer interactions and hyporheic exchange in gaining and losing sinuous streams. Water Resources Research 45: W06429. DOI: 10.1029/2008WR007651.
7. Dahm, C.N., N.B. Grimm, P. Marmonier, H.M. Valett, and P. Vervier 1998. Nutrient dynamics at the interface between surface waters and groundwaters. Freshwater Biology 40, no. 3: 427-451.
8. Elliott, A.H., and N.H. Brooks 1997. Transfer of nonsorbing solutes to a streambed with bed forms: laboratory experiments. Water Resources Research 33, no. 1: 137-151.
9. Ensign, S.H., and M.W. Doyle 2005. In-channel transient storage and associated nutrient retention: evidence from experimental manipulations. Limnology and Oceanography 50, no. 6: 1740-1751.
10. Findlay, S. 1995. Importance of surface-subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: the hyporheic zone. Limnology and Oceanography 40, no. 1: 159-164.
11. Fraser, B.G., and D.D. Williams 1998. Seasonal boundary dynamics of a groundwater/surface-water ecotone. Ecology 79, no. 6: 2019-2031.
12. Gooseff, M.N., J. LaNier, R. Haggerty, and K. Kokkeler 2005. Determining in-channel (dead-zone) transient storage by comparing solute transport in a bedrock channel-alluvial channel sequence, Oregon. Water Resources Research 41: W06014. DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003513.
13. Gu, C., G.M. Hornberger, J.S. Herman, and A.L. Mills 2008. Effect of freshets on the flux of groundwater nitrate through streambed sediments. Water Resources Research 44: W05415. DOI: 10.1029/2007WR006488.
14. Hancock, P.J. 2006. The response of hyporheic invertebrate communities to a large flood in the Hunter River, New South Wales. Hydrobiologia 568, no. 1: 255-262.
15. Hantush, M.M., M. Harada, and M.A. Mariño 2002. Hydraulics of stream flow routing with bank storage. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 7, no. 1: 76-89.
16. Harbaugh, A.W., E.R. Banta, M.C. Hill, and M.G. McDonald 2000. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model-User guide to modularization concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process: USGS Open-File Report 00-92.
17. Hatch, C.E., A.T. Fisher, J.S. Revenaugh, J. Constantz, and C.R. Ruehl 2006. Quantifying surface water-groundwater interactions using time series analysis of streambed thermal records: method development. Water Resources Research 42: W10410. DOI: 10.1029/2005WR004787.
18. Hatch, C.E., A.T. Fisher, C.R. Ruehl, and G. Stemler 2010. Spatial and temporal variations in streambed hydraulic conductivity quantified with time-series thermal methods. Journal of Hydrology 389, no. 3-4: 276-288.
19. Howard, K.W.F., H.S. Maier, and S.L. Mattson 2006. Ground-surface water interactions and the role of the hyporheic zone. In Groundwater and Ecosystems, NATO Science Series IV Earth and Environmental Sciences vol. 70, eds. A. Baba, K.W.F. Howard, and O. Gunduz, 131-143. Netherlands: Springer.
20. Kasahara, T., and S.M. Wondzell 2003. Geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange flow in mountain streams. Water Resources Research 39: 1005. DOI: 10.1029/202WR001386.
21. Käser, D.H., A. Binley, A.L. Heathwaite, and S. Krause 2009. Spatio-temporal variations of hyporheic flow in a riffle-step-pool sequence. Hydrological Processes 23, no. 15: 2138-2149.
22. Kazezyilmaz-Alhan, C.M., and M.A. Medina Jr. 2006. Stream solute transport incorporating hyporheic zone processes. Journal of Hydrology 329, no. 1-2: 26-38.
23. Krause, S., A. Bronstert, and E. Zeheb 2007. Groundwater-surface water interactions in a North German lowland floodplain-implications for the river discharge dynamics and riparian water balance. Journal of Hydrology 347, no. 3-4: 404-417.
24. Lautz, L.K., and D.I. Siegel 2006. Modeling surface and ground water mixing in the hyporheic zone using MODFLOW and MT3D. Advances in Water Resources 29, no. 1: 1618-1633.
25. Lin, Y., and M.A. Medina Jr. 2003. Incorporating transient storage in conjunctive stream-aquifer modeling. Advances in Water Resources 26, no. 9: 1001-1019.
26. Malcolm, I.A., C. Soulsby, and A.F. Youngson 2006. High-frequency logging technologies reveal state-dependant hyporheic process dynamics: implication for hydroecological studies. Hydrological Processes 20, no. 3: 615-622.
27. Misstear, B., D. Banks, and L. Clark 2006. Water Wells and Boreholes. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
28. Nyberg, L., O. Calles, and L. Greenberg 2008. Impact of short-term regulation on hyporheic water quality in a boreal river. River Research and Applications 24, no. 4: 407-419.
29. Olsen, D.A., and C.R. Townsend 2005. Flood effects on invertebrates, sediments and particulate organic matter in the hyporheic zone of a gravel-bed stream. Freshwater Biology 50, no. 5: 839-853.
30. Packman, A.I., M. Salehin, and M. Zaramella 2004. Hyporheic exchange with gravel beds: basic hydrodynamic interactions and bedform-induced advective flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 130, no. 7: 647-656.
31. Pollock, D.W. 1994. User's Guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, Version 3: A particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model. USGS Open-File Report 94-464, ch. 6.
32. Runkel, R.L., D.M. McKnight, and H. Rajaram 2003. Modeling hyporheic zone processes. Advances in Water Resources 26, no. 9: 901-905.
33. Saenger, N., P.K. Kitanidis, and R.L. Street 2002. Modeling transport processes in the hyporheic zone. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2002, Abstract no. H51D-02.
34. Schälchli, U. 1992. The clogging of course gravel river beds by fine sediment. Hydrobiologia 235-236, no. 1: 189-197.
35. Schmid, B.H. 2003. Temporal moments routing in streams and rivers with transient storage. Advances in Water Resources 26, no. 9: 1021-1027.
36. Sophocleous, M. 2002. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal 10, no. 1: 52-67.
37. Storey, R.G., K.W.F. Howard, and D.D. Williams 2003. Factors controlling riffle-scale hyporheic exchange flows and their seasonal changes in a gaining stream: a three-dimensional groundwater flow model. Water Resources Research 39: 1034. DOI: 10.1029/2002WR001367.
38. Thibodeaux, L.J., and J.D. Boyle 1987. Bedform-generated convective transport in bottom sediment. Nature 325, no. 6102: 341-343.
39. Thompson, D.M. 2001. Random controls on semi-rhythmic spacing of pools and riffles in constriction-dominated rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26, no. 11: 1195-1212.
40. Triska, F.J., V.C. Kennedy, R.J. Avanzino, G.W. Zellweger, and K.E. Bencala 1989. Retention and transport of nutrients in a third-order stream in northwestern California: hyporheic processes. Ecology 70, no. 6: 1893-1905.
41. Williams, D.D. 1993. Nutrient and flow vector dynamics at the hyporheic/groundwater interface and their effects on the interstitial fauna. Hydrobiologia 251, no. 1-3: 1893-1905.
42. Woessner, W.W. 2000. Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: rescaling hydrogeologic thought. Ground Water 38, no. 3: 423-429.
43. Wörman, A., A.I. Packman, H. Johansson, and K. Jonsson 2002. Effect of flow-induced exchange in hyporheic zones on longitudinal transport of solutes in streams and rivers. Water Resources Research 38: 1001. DOI: 10.1029/2001WR000769.
44. Wroblicky, G.J., M.E. Campana, H.M. Valett, and C.N. Dahm 1998. Seasonal variation in surface-subsurface water exchange and lateral hyporheic area of two stream-aquifer systems. Water Resources Research 34, no 3: 317-328.
45. Zheng, C. 1990. MT3D, A modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems, Report to the USEPA.