Modified microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy without testicular delivery

Andrologia

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 405-408

  Kim, S O ^a   Chung, H S ^a   Park, K ^a  

^a Chonnam National University Medical School   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL FEATURE; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MODIFIED MICROSURGICAL SUBINGUINAL VARICOCELECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RECURRENT DISEASE; SCHOOL CHILD; SPERMATIC CORD; SURGICAL APPROACH; VARICOCELE; VARICOCELECTOMY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TESTIS; VARICOCELE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054911262     PISSN: 03034569     EISSN: 14390272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01087.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Al-Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ibrahim HM, Elshebiny YH, Shokeir AA (2007) Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urology 69:417-420.
2. Beck EM, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M (1992) Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a macroscopic and microscopic study. J Urol 148:1190-1194.
3. Cayan S, Kadioglu TC, Tefekli A, Kadioglu A, Tellaloglu S (2000) Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele. Urology 55:750-754.
4. Dubin L, Amelar RD (1977) Varicocelectomy: 986 cases in a twelve-year study. Urology 10:446-449.
5. Evers JL, Collins JA (2003) Assessment of efficacy of varicocele repair for male subfertility: a systematic review. Lancet 361:1849-1852.
6. Ghanem H, Anis T, El-Nashar A, Shamloul R (2004) Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome. Urology 64:1005-1009.
7. Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C (1992) Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol 148:1808-1811.
8. Grober ED, O'Brien J, Jarvi KA, Zini A (2004) Preservation of testicular arteries during subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: clinical considerations. J Androl 25:740-743.
9. Harrison RG (1949) The distribution of the vasal and cremasteric arteries to the testis and their functional importance. J Anat 83:267-282.
10. Murray RR Jr, Mitchell SE, Kadir S, Kaufman SL, Chang R, Kinnison ML, Smyth JW, White RI Jr (1986) Comparison of recurrent varicocele anatomy following surgery and percutaneous balloon occlusion. J Urol 135:286-289.
11. Nilsson S, Edvinsson A, Nilsson B (1979) Improvement of semen and pregnancy rate after ligation and division of internal spermatic vein: fact or fiction? Br J Urol 51:591-596.
12. Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN (2006) Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery. Urology 68:1323-1326.
13. Schiff J, Kelly C, Goldstein M, Schlegel P, Poppas D (2005) Managing varicoceles in children: results with microsurgical varicocelectomy. BJU Int 95:399-402.
14. Steckel J, Dicker AP, Goldstein M (1993) Relationship between varicocele size and response to varicocelectomy. J Urol 149:769-771.
15. Zini A, Fischer A, Bellack D, Noss M, Kamal K, Chow V, Mak V (2006) Technical modifications of microsurgical varicocelectomy can reduce operating time. Urology 67:803-806.