Rangeland ecosystem services, risk management, and the ranch bottom line

Rangelands

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 13-19

  Toombs, Ted ^a   Goldstein, Joshua H ^b   Hanson, Craig ^c   Robinson Maness, Nicole ^d   Fankhauser, Terry ^e  

^a ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND   (United States)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^c WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Colorado Cattlemen's Association ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; INVESTMENT; LAND MARKET; RANCHING; RANGELAND; RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAVINGS; TRANSACTION COST; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 80054901383     PISSN: 01900528     EISSN: 1551501X     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.2111/1551-501X-33.5.13     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Goldstein, J. H., C. K. Presnall, L. Lopez-Hoffman, G. P. Nabhan, R. L. Knight, G. B. Ruyle, and T. P. Toombs. 2011. Beef and beyond: paying for ecosystem services on western US rangelands. Rangelands 33:4-12.
2. Davis, A. 2010. Ecosystem services and the value of land. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 20:339-384.
3. Hanson, C., J. Ranganathan, C. Iceland, and J. Finisdore. 2008. The corporate ecosystem services review: guidelines for identifying business risks and opportunities arising from ecosystem change. Version 1. Washington DC, USA: World Resources Institute. 48 p. Available at: www.wri.org/ecosystems/ esr. Accessed 13 June 2011.
4. Denver Water. 2011. From forests to faucets. Available at: http://www.denverwater.org/SupplyPlanning/WaterSupply/ PartnershipUSFS/. Accessed 14 June 2011.
5. Madsen, B., N. Caroll, and K. Moore Brands. 2010. State of biodiversity markets report: offset and compensation programs worldwide. Available at: http://www.thegef.org/gef/sites/thegef. org/files/publication/sbdmr.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2011.
6. Gosnell, H., N. Robinson-Mannes, and S. Charnley. 2011. Engaging ranchers in market-based approaches to climate change mitigation: opportunities, challenges, and policy implications. Rangelands 33:20-24.
7. The Equator Principles Association. 2006. The Equator Principles: a financial industry benchmark for determining, assessing and managing social and environmental risk in project financing. United Kingdom: The Equator Principals Association Miscellaneous Report. 10 p. Available at: http:// www.equator-principles.com/resources/equator-principles.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2011.
8. Mandel, J. T., C. J. Donlan, C. Wilcox, R. Cudney-Bueno, S. Pascoe, and D. Tulchin. 2009. Debt investment as a tool for value transfer in biodiversity conservation. Conservation Letters. 2:233-239.
9. Wolfe, M. L., G. E. Simonds, R. Danvir, and W. J. Hopkin. 1996. Integrating livestock production and wildlife in a sagebrush- grass ecosystem. US Forest Service General Technical Report No. 285. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs-rm/rm-gtr285/rm-gtr285-073-077.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2011.
10. US Department of Agriculture. 2011. Farm of the future. Available at: http://www.usda.gov/oce/environmental-markets/farm.htm. Accessed 20 July 2011.