Influence of field size on pupil diameter under photopic and mesopic light levels

Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 545-548

  Atchison, David A ^a   Girgenti, Cameron C ^a   Campbell, Giles M ^a   Dodds, Jason P ^a   Byrnes, Tim M ^a   Zele, Andrew J ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Field size; Luminance; Melanopsin; Mesopic; Photopic; Pupil size

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PUPIL; REFERENCE VALUE; RETINA; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LIGHTING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PUPIL; REFERENCE VALUES; RETINA; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054901183     PISSN: 08164622     EISSN: 14440938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00636.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Troland LT. On the measurement of visual sensation intensities. J Exp Psychol 1917; 2: 1-34.
2. Reeves P. Rate of pupillary dilation and contraction. Psychol Rev 1918; 25: 330-340.
3. Reeves P. The response of the average pupil to various intensities of light. J Opt Soc Am 1920; 4: 35-43.
4. Crawford BH. The dependence of pupil size upon external light stimulus under static and variable conditions. Proc Royal Soc B 1936; 121: 376-395.
5. Moon P, Spencer DE. On the Stiles-Crawford effect. J Opt Soc Am 1944; 34: 319-329.
6. De Groot SG, Gebhard JW. Pupil size as determined by adapting luminance. J Opt Soc Am 1952; 42: 492-495.
7. Loewenfeld IE. The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Applications. Vol 1, Ch 3. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999.
8. Atchison DA, Smith G. Optics of the Human Eye. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000. p 23-24, 176-177.
9. Ferree CE, Rand G, Harris ET. Intensity of light and area of illuminated field as interacting factors in size of pupil. J Exp Psychol 1933; 16: 408-422.
10. Stanley PA, Davies AK. The effect of field of view size on steady-state pupil diameter. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995; 15: 601-603.
11. Ten Doesschate J, Alpern M. Effect of photoexcitation of the two retinas on pupil size. J Neurophysiol 1967; 30: 562-576.
12. Markwell EL, Feigl B, Zele AJ. Intrinsically photoreceptive melanopsin retinal ganglion cell contributions to the pupil light reflex and circadian rhythm. Clin Exp Optom 2010; 93: 137-149.
13. CIE. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) Proceedings 1931. Cambridge: University Press, 1932.
14. Zele AJ, Feigl B, Smith SS, Markwell EL. The circadian response of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. PloS One 2011: 6: e17860.
15. Clarke RJ, Zhang H, Gamlin PD. Characteristics of the pupillary light reflex in the alert rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 2003: 89: 3179-3189.
16. CIE. Light as a True Visual Quantity: Principles of Measurement. Publ. CIE No. 41 (TC-1.4). Bureau Central de la CIE, Paris, TC-1.4, 1978.
17. Pokorny J, Lutze M, Cao D, Zele AJ. The color of night: surface color perception under dim illuminations. Vis Neurosci 2006; 23: 525-530.
18. McDougal DH, Gamlin PD. The influence of intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells on the spectral sensitivity and response dynamics of the human pupillary light reflex. Vision Res 2010: 50: 72-87.
19. Tsujimura S, Ukai K, Ohama D, Nuruki A, Yunokuchi K. Contribution of human melanopsin retinal ganglion cells to steady-state pupil responses. Proc Biol Sci 2010; 277: 2485-2492.