Corporate social responsibility as a bolster for economic performance: Evidence from emerging markets

Global Business and Organizational Excellence

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 38-53

  Lagoarde Segot, Thomas ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054896137     PISSN: 19322054     EISSN: 19322062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/joe.21403     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Blank, H. D., & Daniel, W. E. (2002, June). The eco-efficiency anomaly. New York: Innovest Strategic Value Advisors.
2. Colwell, S. R., Noseworthy, T. J., & Alexeev, V. V. (2010). Market reaction to negative environmental events: An event study of 10 oil and gas companies. Paper presented at the 2009 International Association of Business and Society Conference, Aspen/Snowmass, CO, United States.
3. Commission of the European Communities (COM). (2001, July 18). Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. 366 final. Brussels: Author.
4. Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The ecoefficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51-63.
5. Diltz, D. J. (1995). Does social screening affect portfolio performance? Journal of Investing, 4(1), 64-69.
6. Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M.-J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning, 34, 585-604.
7. European Federation of Financial Analysts Societies (EFFAS). (2009). KPIs for ESG. A guideline for the integration of ESG into financial analysis and corporate valuation. Frankfurt, Germany: Author.
8. Fernando, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the wake of the Asian tsunami: Effect of time on the genuineness of CSR initiatives. European Management Journal, 28, 68-79.
9. Global Reporting Initiative. (2011). Sustainability reporting guidelines v. 3.1. Amsterdam: Author.
10. Gregory, A., Whittaker, J., & Yan, X. (2010). Stock market valuation of CSR indicators. Discussion Paper No: 10/06, University of Exeter.
11. Guenster, N., Derwall, J., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2010). The economic value of corporate eco-efficiency. European Financial Management. doi: 10.1111/j.1468 036X.2009.00532.x.
12. Heal, G. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 30, 387-409.
13. Henderson, D. (2004). The role of business in the modern world. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
14. International Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC). (2009). Accounting for sustainability. Governance and collaboration. The Prince's Charities. Retrieved from.
15. Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42, 1199-1214.
16. Mackey, A., Mackey, T., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817-835.
17. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77-91.
18. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2005). Corporate sustainability. In T. Tietenberg & H. Folmer (Eds.), The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2005/2006: A survey of current issues (pp. 185-222). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
19. Shane, P. B., & Spicer, B. H. (1983). Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm. Accounting Review 58, 521-538.
20. Sustainable Stock Exchanges Global Dialogue Conference. (2010). Sustainable stock exchanges: Real obstacles, real opportunities. Singapore: Responsible Research.
21. United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEPFI). (2009). Universal ownership: Why externalities matter to institutional investors. Retrieved from.
22. World Federation of Exchanges. (2009). Exchanges and sustainable investment. Retrieved from.