Practitioners, professional cultures, and perceptions of impact assessment

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 11-24

  Morgan, Richard K ^a   Hart, Andrew ^a   Freeman, Claire ^a   Coutts, Brian ^a   Colwill, David ^a   Hughes, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Effectiveness; Impact assessment; New Zealand; Perceptions; Practitioners; Professional culture

Indexed keywords

EFFECTIVENESS; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; NEW ZEALAND; PERCEPTIONS; PRACTITIONERS; PROFESSIONAL CULTURE;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL TRAINING; PLANNING; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

RATING;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 80054883246     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cashmore M., Bond A., Sadler B. Introduction: the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2009, 27:91-93.
2. Emmelin L. Evaluating Nordic environmental impact assessment-part 2: professional culture as an aid in understanding implementation. Hous Theory Soc 1998, 15:187-209.
3. Jalava K., Pasanen S., Saalasti M., Kuitunen M. Quality of environmental impact assessment: Finnish EISs and the opinions of EIA professionals. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2010, 28:15-27.
4. Jha-Thakur U., Gazzola P., Peel D., Fischer T.B., Kidd S. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment-the significance of learning. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2009, 27:133-144.
5. Marincioni F. Information technologies and the sharing of disaster knowledge: the critical role of professional culture. Disasters 2007, 31:459-476.
6. Ministry for the Environment A guide to preparing a basic assessment of environmental effects 2006, Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, NZ.
7. Morgan R. Environmental impact assessment; a methodological approach 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
8. Morgan R.K., Maria L. Environmental consultants and the assessment of environmental effects in New Zealand. Training in and perception of environmental assessment 1999, Centre for Impact Assessment Research and Training, Publication Number 2. Department of Geography, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
9. Morrison-Saunders A., Bailey J. Appraising the role of relationships between regulators and consultants for effective EIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2009, 29:284-294.
10. Morrison-Saunders A., Bailey J. Practitioner perspectives on the role of science in environmental impact assessment. Environ Manage 2003, 31:683-695.
11. Morrison-Saunders A., Annandale D., Cappelluti J. Practitioner perspectives on what influences EIA quality. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2001, 19:321-325.
12. Sanchez L., Morrison-Saunders A. Teaching impact assessment: results of an international survey. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2010, 28:245-250.
13. Wallington T., Bina O., Thissen W. Theorising strategic environmental assessment: fresh perspectives and future challenges. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2007, 27:569-584.
14. Wegner A., Moore S.A., Bailey J. Consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment in Western Australia: practitioner perceptions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2005, 25:143-162.