On the impact of dispersal asymmetry on metapopulation persistence

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 290, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 37-45

  Kleinhans, David ^a   Jonsson, Per R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b GÖTEBORG UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Connectivity matrix; Dispersal network; Metapopulation viability; Symmetry

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRY; CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION THEORY; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; SYMMETRY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DISPERSAL ASYMMETRY; METAPOPULATION; METAPOPULATION PERSISTENCE; POPULATION DISPERSAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 80054868616     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Armsworth P.R. Recruitment limitation, population regulation, and larval connectivity in reef fish metapopulations. Ecology 2002, 83(4):1092-1104.
2. Artzy-Randrup Y., Stone L. Connectivity, cycles, and persistence thresholds in metapopulation networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6(8):e1000876.
3. Barabási A., Oltvai Z. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5(2):101-113.
4. Berchenko Y., Artzy-Randrup Y., Teicher M., Stone L. Emergence and size of the giant component in clustered random graphs with a given degree distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102(13):138701.
5. Bode M., Bode L., Armsworth P. Larval dispersal reveals regional sources and sinks in the Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2006, 308:17-25.
6. Bode M., Burrage K., Possingham H. Using complex network metrics to predict the persistence of metapopulations with asymmetric connectivity patterns. Ecol. Modell. 2008, 214(2-4):201-209.
7. Brandes, U., Erlebach, T. (Eds.), 2005. Network Analysis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol. 3418, Springer, Berlin.
8. Callaway D., Newman M., Strogatz S., Watts D. Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85(25):5468-5471.
9. Caswell, H., 2001. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation, second ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
10. Crooks K., Sanjayan M. Connectivity Conservation 2006, Cambridge University Press.
11. Davis S., Trapman P., Leirs H., Begon M., Heesterbeek J. The abundance threshold for plague as a critical percolation phenomenon. Nature 2008, 454(7204):634-637.
12. Gyllenberg M., Hanski I. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: a structured model. Theor. Popul. Biol. (Print) 1992, 42(1):35-61.
13. Haight R., Travis L. Reserve design to maximize species persistence. Environ. Model. Assessment 2008, 13(2):243-253.
14. Hanski I. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 1994, 63(1):151-162.
15. Hanski I. Metapopulation Ecology 1999, Oxford University Press.
16. Hanski I. Metapopulations of animals in highly fragmented landscapes and population viability analysis. Popul. Viability Anal. 2002, 86-108.
17. Hanski I., Gilpin M. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution 1997, Academic Press, San Diego.
18. Hanski I., Gilpin M. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 1998, 396(6706):41-49.
19. Joshi J., Schmid B., Caldeira M., Dimitrakopoulos P., Good J., Harris R., Hector A., Huss-Danell K., Jumpponen A., Minns A., Mulder C., Pereira J., Prinz A., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Siamantziouras A., Terry A., Troumbis A., Lawton J. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4(6):536-544.
20. Kawecki T., Holt R. Evolutionary consequences of asymmetric dispersal rates. Am. Nat. 2002, 160(3):333-347.
21. Kininmonth S.J., De'ath G., Possingham H.P. Graph theoretic topology of the Great but small Barrier Reef world. Theor. Ecol. 2010, 3(2):75-88.
22. Levins R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1969, 15(2):237-240.
23. Malchow H., Petrovskii S.V., Venturino E. Spatiotemporal Patterns in Ecology and Epidemiology 2008, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
24. McCallum H., Dobson A. Disease, habitat fragmentation and conservation. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 2002, 269(1504):2041-2049.
25. Nathan R., Safriel U., Noy-Meir I. Field validation and sensitivity analysis of a mechanistic model for tree seed dispersal by wind. Ecology 2001, 82(2):374-388.
26. Pulliam H., Danielson B. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat. 1991, 137(S1):50.
27. Roy M., Harding K., Holt R. Generalizing Levins' metapopulation model in explicit space: models of intermediate complexity. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 255(1):152-161.
28. Roy M., Holt R., Barfield M. Temporal autocorrelation can enhance the persistence and abundance of metapopulations comprised of coupled sinks. Am. Nat. 2005, 166(2):246-261.
29. Sultan S., Spencer H. Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am. Nat. 2002, 160(2):271-283.
30. van Teeffelen A., Cabeza M., Moilanen A. Connectivity, probabilities and persistence: comparing reserve selection strategies. Biodivers. Conserv. 2006, 15(3):899-919.
31. Vuilleumier S., Bolker B.M., Lévĉque O. Effect of colonization asymmetries on metapopulation persistence. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2010, 78:225-238.
32. Vuilleumier S., Possingham H. Does colonization asymmetry matter in metapopulations?. Proc. R. Soc. B 2006, 273(1594):1637.
33. Wares J., Gaines S., Cunningham C. A comparative study of asymmetric migration events across a marine biogeographic boundary. Evolution 2001, 55(2):295-306.
34. Watts D., Strogatz S. Collective dynamics of 'small world' networks. Nature 1998, 393:440-442.