A commentary on “Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it”

Accounting Education

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 11-12

  Fogarty, Timothy J ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054861210     PISSN: 09639284     EISSN: 14684489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/06939280500452876     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Adler, R. W., 2006. Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it. Accounting Education: an international journal, 15 (1): 3–10.
2. Kelliher, C., 1996. The advantages of introducing uncertainty in the teaching of pensions. Journal of Accounting Education, 14 (1): 69–98.
3. Fogarty, T., and Goldwater, P., 1996. Tax planning and tax education with Monte Carlo simulation techniques. Accounting Education: an international journal, 5 (2): 169–182.
4. Goldwater, P., and Fogarty, T., 1995. Overcoming the false certainty of accounting education: the use of Monte Carlo simulation by accounting students. Journal of Accounting and Computers, 11: 73–89.