Decision-making tools and the development of expertise in child protection practitioners: Are we 'just breeding workers who are good at ticking boxes'?

Child and Family Social Work

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 412-421

  Gillingham, Philip ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Decision making tools; Expertise; Training

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054860443     PISSN: 13567500     EISSN: 13652206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00756.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Balen, R. & Masson, H. (2008) The Victoria Climbie Case: social work education for practice in children and families' work before and since. Child and Family Social Work, 13, 121-132.
2. Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S. & Pithouse, A. (2010) Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: identifying the informal logics of risk management in children's statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1046-1064.
3. Buckley, H. (2003) Child Protection Work: Beyond the Rhetoric. Jessica Kingsley, London.
4. CMC (2004) Protecting Children: An Inquiry into Abuse of Children in Foster Care. Crime and Misconduct Commission, Queensland.
5. Corby, B. (2006) Child Abuse: Towards a Knowledge Base, 3rd edn. Open University Press, Maidenhead.
6. CRC (1999) The Improvement of Child Protective Services with Structured Decision Making: The CRC Model. Children's Research Centre, National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Available at: (accessed June 2006).
7. CSS (2010) Child Safety Services. Department of Communities, State Government of Queensland. Available at: (accessed June 2010).
8. DCS (2007) Child Protection Queensland 2005-06 Performance Report. Department of Child Safety, Brisbane, Queensland. Available at: (accessed April 2007).
9. Dingwall, R., Ecklehaar, J. & Murray, T. (1983) The Protection of Children: State Intervention and Family Life. Blackwell, Oxford.
10. DoCS (2009) Keep Them Safe: A Shared Approach to Child Wellbeing. Department of Community Services, New South Wales. Available at: (accessed April 2009).
11. English, D.E. & Pecora, P.J. (1994) Risk assessment as a practice method in child protective services. Child Welfare, 73, 451-474.
12. Everitt, A., Hardiker, P., Littlewood, J. & Mullender, A. (1992) Applied Research for Better Practice. Macmillan with British Association of Social Workers, London.
13. Fook, J., Ryan, M. & Hawkins, L. (2000) Professional Expertise: Practice, Theory and Education for Working in Uncertainty. Whiting and Birch, London.
14. Gambrill, E. & Shlonsky, A. (2000) Risk assessment in context. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 813-837.
15. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
16. Gillingham, P. (2006) Risk assessment in child protection: problem rather than solution? Australian Social Work, 59, 86-98.
17. Gillingham, P. (2009a) The use of assessment tools in child protection: an ethnomethodological study. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne. Available at:.
18. Gillingham, P. (2009b) Practitioner perspectives on the family risk evaluation tool: an aide to decision making or 'just another form to fill in'? Developing Practice: The Child, Family and Youth Work Journal, 23, 46-55.
19. Gillingham, P. & Humphreys, C. (2010) Child protection practitioners and decision making tools: observations and reflections from the frontline. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2598-2616.
20. Goddard, C.R., Saunders, B.J., Stanley, J.R. & Tucci, J. (1999) Structured risk assessment procedures: instruments of abuse? Child Abuse Review, 8, 251-263.
21. Gough, D. (1998) A risky business. Child Abuse Review, 7, 139-143.
22. ten Have, P. (2002) The notion of member is at the heart of the matter: on the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry. Forum: Qualitative Research, 3, 3. Available at: (accessed July 2006).
23. Holland, S. (1999) Discourses of decision-making in child protection: conducting comprehensive assessments in Britain. International Journal of Social Welfare, 8, 277-287.
24. Katz, J. (2001) Ethnography's warrants. In: Ethnography (ed. A. Bryman), Vol. 1, pp. 323-345. Sage, London.
25. Laming, H. (2009) The Protection of Children in England: A Progress Report. House of Commons, London.
26. Marlow, C. (2001) Research Methods for Generalist Social Work. Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA.
27. Maynard, D.W. & Clayman, S.E. (1991) The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385-418.
28. Munro, E. (1999) Common errors of reasoning in child protection work. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 745-758.
29. Munro, E. (2005) What tools do we need to improve identification of child abuse? Child Abuse Review, 14, 374-388.
30. Parton, N. (1998) Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: the need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28, 5-27.
31. Parton, N., Thorpe, D. & Wattam, C. (1997) Child Protection: Risk and the Moral Order. Macmillan, Basingstoke.
32. Proctor, E.K. (2002) Decision making in social work practice. Social Work Research, 26, 3-5.
33. Reder, P. & Duncan, S. (2004) Making the most of the Victoria Climbie inquiry report. Child Abuse Review, 13, 95-114.
34. Reder, P., Duncan, S. & Gray, M. (1993) Beyond Blame: Child Abuse Tragedies Revisited. Routledge, London.
35. Rycus, J.S. & Hughes, R.C. (2003) Issues in Risk Assessment in Child Protective Services. American Center for Child Welfare, Center for Child Welfare Policy, Columbus, OH.
36. Schwalbe, C. (2004) Re-visioning risk assessment for human service decision making. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 561-576.
37. Smith, J. (1991) A methodology for the twenty-first century. Social Forces, 70, 1-17.
38. Stewart, A. & Thompson, C. (2004) Comparative Evaluation of Child Protection Assessment Tools. Griffiths University, Brisbane.
39. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, Newbury Park.