Using SEC enforcement releases to teach auditing and ethics-related concepts

Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations

Volumn 9, Issue , 2008, Pages 17-55

  D'Aquila, Jill M ^a  

^a JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054852303     PISSN: 10854622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1085-4622(08)09002-0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., & Albrecht, C. O. (2006). Fraud examination (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2003). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99: Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. New York: AIPCA.
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2006a). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 104: Amendment to Statement on Auditing Standard No. 1, Codification of auditing standards and procedures. New York: AIPCA.
4. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2006b). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 105: Amendment to Statement on Auditing Standard No. 95, Generally Accepted Auditing Standards. New York: AIPCA.
5. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2006c). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 106: Audit evidence. New York: AIPCA.
6. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2006d). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 107: Audit risk and materiality in conducting an audit. New York: AIPCA.
7. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2006e). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 108: Planning and supervision. New York: AIPCA.
8. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2006f). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 109: Understanding the entity and its environment and assessing the risks of material misstatement. New York: AIPCA.
9. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2006g). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 110: Performing audit procedures in response to assessed risks and evaluating the audit evidence obtained. New York: AIPCA.
10. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2006h). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 111: Amendment to Statement on Auditing Standard No. 39, Audit sampling. New York: AIPCA.
11. Beasley, M. S., Buckless, F. A., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2006). Auditing cases (3rd ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
12. Clikeman, P. M. (2000). Integrating research into the initial auditing course. Advances in Accounting Education (2), 113-130.
13. Cullinan, C. P., & Wright, G. B. (2003). Cases from the SEC files: Topics in auditing. Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
14. Earley, C. E., & Kelly, P. T. (2004). A note on ethics educational interventions in an undergraduate auditing course: Is there an ''Enron effect''? Issues in Accounting Education, 19(1), 53-71.
15. Gaa, J. C., & Thorne, L. (2004). An introduction to the special issue on professionalism and ethics in accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(1), 1-6.
16. Haywood, M. E., McMullen, D. A., & Wygal, D. E. (2004). Using games to enhance student understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(1), 85-99.
17. Jennings, M. M. (2004). Incorporating ethics and professionalism into accounting education and research: A discussion of the voids and advocacy for training in seminal works in business ethics. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(1), 7-26.
18. Knapp, M. C. (2007). Contemporary auditing: Real issues and cases (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
19. Licata, M. P., Bremser, W. G., & Rollins, T. P. (1997). SEC enforcement actions against auditors: Auditing education linked to the pitfalls of audit practice. Issues in Accounting Education, 12(2), 537-560.
20. Madison, R. L., & Schmidt, J. J. (2006). Survey of time devoted to ethics in accountancy programs in North American colleges and universities. Issues in Accounting Education, 21(2), 99-109.
21. Mintz, S. M., & Morris, R. E. (2008). Ethical obligations and decision making in accounting: Text and cases. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
22. Peterson, B. K., & Buckhoff, T. A. (2004). Anti-fraud education in academia. Advances in Accounting Education (6), 45-67.
23. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2003). Educating for the public trust: The PricewaterhouseCoopers position on accounting education. New York, NY: PricewaterhouseCoopers. Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Public Law 107-204). 2002.
24. SEC. (2003). Report Pursuant to Section 704 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, January 24.
25. Stice, J. D., & Stocks, K. D. (2000). Effective teaching techniques: Perceptions of accounting faculty. Advances in Accounting Education (2), 179-191.
26. Thibodeau, J., & Freier, D. (2007). Auditing after Sarbanes-Oxley: Illustrative cases. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27. Thomas, C. W. (2004). An inventory of support materials for teaching ethics in the post-Enron era. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(1), 27-52.