Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication

AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 141-149

  Von Tetzchner, Stephen ^a,b   Basil, Carmen ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Augmentative and alternative communication; Conversation; Notation; Terminology

Indexed keywords

AIDED COMMUNICATION; ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION; AUGMENTATIVE-AND-ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION; CONVERSATION; GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS; NOTATION;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; TERMINOLOGY; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

HUMAN REHABILITATION ENGINEERING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; CHILD; COMMUNICATION AID; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; NOMENCLATURE; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; SIGN LANGUAGE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SYMBOLISM; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; WRITING;

ADULT; CHILD; COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR DISABLED; COMMUNICATION METHODS, TOTAL; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; SIGN LANGUAGE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SYMBOLISM; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; WRITING;

EID: 80054848775     PISSN: 07434618     EISSN: 14773848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2011.610356     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baker, B. (1982). Minspeak: A semantic compaction system that makes self expression easier for communicatively disabled individuals. Byte, 7, 186-202.
2. Balandin, S. (2002). Message from the President. The ISAAC Bulletin, 67, 2.
3. Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.
4. Blau, A. F. (1987). A response to Fuller and Lloyd: Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: A proposed superordinate classifcation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 97-99.
5. Bliss, C. K. (1965). Semantography (Blissymbolics). Sydney: Semantography Publications.
6. Bryen, D. N., Heake, G., Semenuk, A., & Segal, M. (2010). Improving Web access for individuals who rely on augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 21-99.
7. Collier, B., McGhie-Richmond, D., & Self, H. (2010). Exploring communication assistants as an option for increasing communication access to communities for people who use augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 48-59.
8. Cooper, L., Balandin, S., & Trembath, D. (2009). The loneliness experiences of young adults with cerebral palsy who use alternative and augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 154-164.
9. Friedman, L. A. (1977). Formational properties of American Sign Language. In L. A. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 13-57). New York: Academic Press.
10. Fried-Oken, M. (1987). Terminology in augmentative communication. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 18, 188-191.
11. Fuller, D. R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1991). Toward a common usage of iconicity terminology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 215-220.
12. Fuller, D. R., Lloyd, L. L., & Schlosser, R. W. (1992). Further development of an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 67-76.
13. Grove, N., & Tucker, S. (2003). Narratives in manual sign by children with intellectual impairments. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 229-255). London, UK: Whurr/Wiley.
14. Hedvall, P.-O., & Rydeman, B. (2010). An activity systemic approach to augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 230-241.
15. Hjelmquist, E., & Sandberg, A.D. (1996). Sounds and silence: Interaction in aided language use. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 137-152). London: Whurr/Wiley.
16. Iacono, T. (2002). Editorial: Words. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 215-216.
17. International Phonetic Association (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Johnson, R. (1981). The Picture Communication Symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
19. Kraat, A. W. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report. Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
20. Küntay, A., & Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1998). Conversational narratives of children: Occasions and structures. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 113-120.
21. Kuntze, M. (2001). The Berkeley Transcription System. In S. von Tetzchner & J. Clibbens (Eds.), Understanding the theoretical and methodological bases of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 60-63). Toronto: International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
22. Lloyd, L. L. (1985). Comments on terminology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 95-97.
23. Lloyd, L. L., & Blischak, D. M. (1992). AAC terminology policy and issues update. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 104-109.
24. Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1986). Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: A proposed superordinate classifcation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 165-171.
25. Lloyd, L. L., & Kangas, K. A. (1988). AAC terminology policy and issues. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 54-57.
26. Lloyd, L. L., & Kangas, K. A. (1990). AAC terminology policy and issues update. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 167-170.
27. Lloyd, L. L., Quist, R. W. , & 〉Windsor, J. (1990). A proposed augmentative and alternative communication model. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 172-183.
28. Mirenda, P. (1991). Terminology about people: Comments on Lloyd and Kangas (1990). Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 67, 59-60.
29. Musselwhite, C. R. (1987). Further comments on terminology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 164-165.
30. Sundqvist, A., & Rönnberg, J. (2010). A qualitative analysis of email interactions of children using augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 255-266.
31. Sutton, A. (2010). Staying on the cutting edge. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 223-225.
32. Trembath, D., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R. J., & Togher, L. (2010). "Communication is everything": The experiences of volunteers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 75-86.
33. Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Morford, J. P. , Côte-Giroux, P. , Pauze, A.-M., & Vallée, V. (2010). Strategies in construction and interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 299-312.
34. Von Tetzchner, S., & Jensen, M. H. (1996). Introduction. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 1-18). London, UK: Whurr/Wiley.
35. Von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (1996). Words and strategies: Communicating with young children who use aided language. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 65-88). London: Whurr/Wiley.
36. Waksvik, K. (1985). Readers forum. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 52-54.
37. Wisenburn, B., & Higgimbotham, D. J. (2009). Participant evaluations of rate and communication effcacy of an AAC application using natural language processing. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 78-89.
38. Zangari, C., Lloyd, L. L., & Vicker, B. (1994). Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 27-59.