Using a technologymediated approach to create a practice-feedback- interaction process for use with accounting courses

Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations

Volumn 9, Issue , 2008, Pages 267-286

  Lillie, Richard E ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054848178     PISSN: 10854622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1085-4622(08)09013-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning - A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12, 1-10.
2. Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 43.
3. Baker, J. D., & Woods, R. H., Jr. (2004). Interaction and immediacy in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2).
4. Boettcher, J. (2007). Ten core principles for designing effective learning environments: Insights from brain research and pedagogical theory. Innovate, 3(3)Retrieved on February 19, 2008. Available at www.innovateonline. info/index.php?view00BC;article&id00BC;54.
5. Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. Accessed on July 28, 2007. Available at www.csuhayward.edu/wasc/pdfs/End%20Note.pdf.
6. Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-459.
7. Clark, R. C. (2003). Building expertise, cognitive methods for training and performance improvement. Silver Springs, MD: International Society for Performance Improvement.
8. Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., & Moskal, P. (2004). Blended learning (ID: ERB0407). Educause Research Bulletin, 2004(7), 1-12Retrieved on February 2, 2008. Available at http://ecampus.nl.edu/resources/webct/ BlendedLearningUCFStudy.pdf.
9. Frand, J. L. (2000). The information-age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education. Educause Review (September/October), 15-24.
10. Hardaway, D., & Scamell, R. (2005). Use of a technology-mediated learning instructional approach for teaching an introduction to information technology course. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16, 137-145.
11. Keefe, T. (2003). Enhancing a Face-to-Face Course with Online Lectures: Instructional and Pedagogical Issues. Murfreesboro, Tennessee: Eighth Annual Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference. Retrieved on February 19, 2008. Available at http://www.mtsu.edu/Bitconf/proceed03/109.html.
12. Larose, R., &Whitten, P. (2000). Re-thinking instructional immediacy for web courses: A social cognitive exploration. Communication Education, 49, 320-338.
13. Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, Gen-Xers, Millennials: Understanding the new students. Educause Review (July/August), 38-47.
14. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the Net Generation? In: D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds), Educating the Net Generation, Educause. Retrieved on July 24, 2007. Available at http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/.
15. Reiser, R. (1994). Clark's invitation to dance: An instructional designer's response. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 45-48.
16. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 66-88. Available at http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/JALN/v7n1/v7n1-richardson.asp.
17. Roberts, G. R. (2005). Technology and learning expectations of the Net Generation. In: D. G. Oblinger, & J. L. Oblinger (Eds), Educating the Net Generation. Educause. Retrieved on July 24, 2007. Available at http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/.
18. Salkowitz, R. (2008). Generation blend: Managing across the technology age gap (p. 60). New Jersey: Wiley.
19. Surry, D. (2005). Editorial. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 933-935.
20. Thurman, V. A., & Wambach, K. (2004). Understanding interactions in distance education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 1(1)Retrieved on February 19, 2008. Available at http://itdl.org/journal/Jan-04/index.htm.
21. Tsutsui, M. (2004). Multimedia as a means to enhance feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(3/4), 377-402.