Effects of monocot and dicot types and species richness in mesocosm constructed wetlands on removal of pollutants from wastewater

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 22, 2011, Pages 10260-10265

  Zhang, Chong Bang ^a   Liu, Wen Li ^a   Wang, Jiang ^a   Ge, Yong ^b   Ge, Ying ^c   Chang, Scott X ^d   Chang, Jie ^c  

^a TAIZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Huangyan Municipality ^*  (China)

^c ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Plant and microbial biomass; Plant diversity; Planting types; Removal efficiency

Indexed keywords

ABOVE GROUND BIOMASS; CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; D TYPES; MESOCOSMS; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; MIXED PLANTING; ONE-WAY ANOVA; PLANT BIOMASS; PLANT DIVERSITY; PLANTING TYPES; REMOVAL EFFICIENCY; SPECIES RICHNESS;

BIOMASS; FORESTRY; PHOSPHORUS; WASTEWATER; WETLANDS;

NITROGEN REMOVAL;

AMMONIA; NITRATE; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS;

BIOMASS; CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; DICOTYLEDON; MESOCOSM; MICROORGANISM; MONOCOTYLEDON; PHYTOMASS; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SPECIES RICHNESS; VARIANCE ANALYSIS; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ACORUS CALAMUS; ALTERNANTHERA PHILOXEROIDES; ARTEMISIA LAVANDULAEFOLIA; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CANNA INDICA; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; CYPERUS ROTUNDUS; DESMODIUM PODOCARPUM; HOUTTUYNIA CORDATA; JUNCUS EFFUSES; KALIMERIS INDICA; MESOCOSM; OENANTHE JAVANICA; OPHIOPOGON JAPONICUS; PENTHORUM CHINENSE; PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS; PLANT; PLANTAGO ASIATICA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANUNCULUS ASIATICUS; SCIRPUS TRIQUETER; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANGIOSPERMS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOMASS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WETLANDS;

DICOTYLEDONEAE;

EID: 80054840005     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.081     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Amato M., Ladd J.N. Assay for microbial biomass based on ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen in extracts of fumigated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1988, 20:107-114.
2. Braskerud B.C. Factors affecting phosphorus retention in small constructed wetlands treating agricultural non-point source pollution. Ecol. Eng. 2002, 19:41-61.
3. Brookes P.C., Powlson D.S., Jenkinson D.S. Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1982, 14:319-329.
4. Burgoon P.S., Reddy K.R., deBurk T.A. Domestic wastewater treatment using emergent plants cultured in gravel and plastic substrate. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment 1989, 541-543. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI. D.A. Hammer (Ed.).
5. Calheiros C.S.C., Rangel A.O.S.S., Castro P.M.L. Constructed wetland systems vegetated with different plants applied to the treatment of tannery wastewater. Water Res. 2007, 41:790-1798.
6. Callaway R.M., Theien G.C., Barth S., Ramsey P.W., Gannon J.E. Soil fungi alter interactions between the invader Centaurea maculosa and North American natives. Ecology 2004, 85:1062-1071.
7. Chaudhry M.S., Batool Z., Khan A.G. Preliminary assessment of plant community structure and arbuscular mycorrhizas in rangeland habitats of Cholistan desert, Pakistan. Mycorrhiza 2005, 15:606-611.
8. Engelhardt K.A.M., Ritchie M.E. Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services. Nature 2001, 411:687-689.
9. Engelhardt K.A.M., Ritchie M.E. The effect of aquatic plant species richness on wetland ecosystem processes. Ecology 2002, 83:2911-2924.
10. Faulwetter J.L., Gagnon V., Sundberg C., Chazarenc F., Burr M.D., Brisson J., Camper A.K., Stein O.R. Microbial processes influencing performance of treatment wetlands: a review. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35:987-1004.
11. Hunter R.G., Combs D.L., George D.B. Nitrogen, phosphorous, and organic carbon removal in simulated wetland treatment systems. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2001, 41:274-281.
12. Kantawanichkul S., Kladpraserta S., Brix H. Treatment of high-strength wastewater in tropical vertical flow constructed wetlands planted with Typha angustifolia and Cyperus involucratus. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35:238-247.
13. Kelderman P., Kansiime F., Tola M.A., van Dam A. The role of sediments for phosphorus retention in the Kirinya wetland (Uganda). Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 2007, 15:481-488.
14. Khan M.A., Shah M.A. Studies on biomass changes and nutrient lock-up efficiency in a Kashmir Himalayan wetland ecosystem, India. J. Ecol. Nat. Environ. 2010, 2:147-153.
15. Krauter P., Daily B., Dibley V. Perchlorate and nitrate remediation efficiency and microbial diversity in a containerized wetland bioreactor. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2005, 7:113-128.
16. Kyambadde J., Kansiime F., Gumaelius L., Dalhammar G. A comparative study of Cyperus papyrus and Miscanthidium violaceum-based constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in a tropical climate. Water Res. 2004, 38:475-485.
17. Lavrova S., Koumanova B. Influence of recirculation in a lab-scale vertical flow constructed wetland on the treatment efficiency of landfill leachate. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:1756-1761.
18. Liu Z.F., Liu G.H., Fu B.J., Zheng X.X. Relationship between plant species diversity and soil microbial functional diversity along a longitudinal gradient in temperate grasslands of Hulunbeir, Inner Mongolia, China. Ecol. Res. 2008, 23:511-518.
19. Lizama, A.K., Fletcher, T.D., Sun, S.Z., 2011. Removal processes for arsenic in constructed wetlands. Chemosphere doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.022.
20. Maine M.A., Suñe N., Hadad H., Sánchez G., Bonetto C. Removal efficiency of a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment according to vegetation dominance. Chemosphere 2007, 68:1105-1113.
21. Maltais-Landry G., Chazarenc F., Comeau Y., Troesch S., Brisson J. Effects of artificial aeration, macrophyte species, and loading rate on removal efficiency in constructed wetland mesocosms treating fish farm wastewater. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2007, 6:409-414.
22. Marchand L., Mench M., Jacob D.L., Otte M.L. Metal and metalloid removal in constructed wetlands, with emphasis on the importance of plants and standardized measurements: a review. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:3447-3461.
23. Mogami N., Miyamoto M., Onozuka M., Nakamura N. Comparison of callose plug structure between dicotyledon and monocotyledon pollen germinated in vitro. Grana 2006, 45:249-256.
24. National Environment Protection Agency of China Standard Analysis Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 4th Version 2002, Chinese Environmental Science Press, Beijing.
25. Osem Y., Chen Y., Levinsonc D., Hadar Y. The effects of plant roots on microbial community structure in aerated wastewater-treatment reactors. Ecol. Eng. 2007, 29:133-142.
26. Reinhart K.O., Callaway R.N. Soil biota facilitate exotic acer invasions in Europe and North America. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14:1737-1745.
27. Richardson C.J. Mechanisms controlling phosphorus retention capacity in freshwater wetlands. Science 1985, 4706:1424-1427.
28. Ryan P.R., Delhaize E. Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 52:527-560.
29. Scholz M., Xu J. Performance comparison of experimental constructed wetlands with different filter media and macrophytes treating industrial wastewater contaminated with lead and copper. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83:71-79.
30. Sirianuntapiboon S., Jitvimolnimit S. Effect of plantation pattern on the efficiency of subsurface flow constructed wetland (SFCW) for sewage treatment. Afr. J. Agri. Res. 2007, 2:447-454.
31. Snowden R.E.D., Wheeler B.D. Chemical changes in selected wetland plant species with increasing Fe supply, with specific reference to root precipitates and Fe tolerance. New Phytol. 1995, 131:503-520.
32. 14C labeled cells. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1988, 20:337-343.
33. Vacca G., Wand H., Nikolausz M., Kuschk P., Kastner M. Effect of plants and filter materials on bacteria removal in pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Water Res. 2005, 39:1361-1373.
34. van Ruijven J., Berendse F. Long-term persistence of a positive plant diversity productivity relationship in the absence of legumes. Oikos 2009, 118:101-106.
35. Visser E.J.W., Colmer T.D., Blom C.W.P.M., Voesenek L.A.C.J. Changes in growth, porosity, and radial oxygen loss from adventitious roots of selected mono- and dicotyledonous wetland species with contrasting types of aerenchyma. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23:1237-1245.
36. Werker A.G., Dougherty J.M., Mchenry J.L., van Loon W.A. Treatment variability for wastewater treatment design in cold climate. Ecol. Eng. 2002, 19:1-11.
37. Wießner A., Kappelmeyer U., Kuschk P., Kästner M. Influence of the redox condition dynamics on the removal efficiency of a laboratory-scale constructed wetland. Water Res. 2005, 39:248-256.
38. Zhang C.B., Wang J., Liu W.L., Zhu S.X., Ge H.L., Chang S.X., Chang J., Ge Y. Effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and community metabolic profiles in a full-scale constructed wetland. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36:62-68.
39. Zhang C.B., Wang J., Liu W.L., Zhu S.X., Liu D., Chang S.X., Chang J., Ge Y. Effects of plant diversity on nutrient retention and enzyme activities in a full-scale constructed wetland. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:1686-1692.
40. Zak D.R., Holmes W.E., White D.C., Peacock A.D., Tilman D. Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links?. Ecology 2003, 84:2042-2050.