Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: A pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 415-426

  De Kok, Ingeborg J ^a   Chang, Kuang Han ^a   Lu, Tsui Shan ^b   Cooper, Lyndon F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Mandibular fixed denture; Mandibular overdenture; Patient satisfaction; Prosthetic outcome

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TITANIUM;

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURVIVAL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACRYLIC RESINS; AGED; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE BASES; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE REBASING; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMMEDIATE DENTAL IMPLANT LOADING; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80054823706     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Petersen PE. The world oral health report 2003: Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century-The approach of the WHO global oral health programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31(suppl 1): 3-23.
2. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 5-8.
3. van Waas MA. The influence of psychologic factors on patient satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 545-548.
4. Boerrigter EM, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Boering G. Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 53: 1167-1173.
5. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van’t Hof MA, Geertman ME, Van Oort RP. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures; A 5-years’ follow-up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 238-244.
6. Awad MA, Locker D, Korner-Bitensky N, Feine JS. Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on healthrelated quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1659-1663.
7. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: Satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 117-122.
8. Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 401-410.
9. Burns DR. The mandibular complete overdenture [review]. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 603-623.
10. Liddelow GJ, Henry PJ. A prospective study of immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdentures:Preliminary one-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97(6, suppl): S126-S137.
11. Walton JN, Glick N, Macentee MI. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 331-339.
12. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP, Sendi P. A cost-effectiveness analysis of implant overdentures. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 717-721.
13. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentur. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 413-414.
14. Fitzpatrick B. Standard of care for the edentulous mandible:A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 71-78.
15. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: A mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 27: 120-132.
16. Jacobs R, Schotte A, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Posterior jaw bone resorption in osseointegrated implantsupported overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3: 63-70.
17. Wright PS, Glantz PO, Randow K, Watson RM. The effects of fixed and removable implant-stabilised prostheses on posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 169-174.
18. Davis WH, Lam PS, Marshall MW, Dorchester W, Hochwald DA, Kaminishi RM. Using restorations borne totally by anterior implants to preserve the edentulous mandible. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 1183-1189.
19. Brånemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 227-231.
20. Fueki K, Kimoto K, Ogawa T, Garrett NR. Effect of implantsupported or retained dentures on masticatory performance:A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98: 470-477.
21. Blomberg S, Lindquist LW. Psychological reactions to edentulousness and treatment with jawbone-anchored bridges. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 68: 251-262.
22. Chiapasco M, Gatti C. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: A 3- to 8-year prospective study on 328 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 29-38.
23. Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. "All-on-Four" immediate-function concept with Brånemark system implants for completely edentulous mandibles: A retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5(suppl 1): 2-9.
24. Brånemark PI, Engstrand P, Ohrnell LO, et al. Brånemark Novum:A new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999; 1: 2-16.
25. Engstrand P, Grondahl K, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Nannmark U, Brånemark PI. Prospective follow-up study of 95 patients with edentulous mandibles treated according to the Brånemark Novum concept. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 3-10.
26. Henry PJ, van Steenberghe D, Blomback U, et al. Prospective multicenter study on immediate rehabilitation of edentulous lower jaws according to the Brånemark Novum protocol. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 137-142.
27. De Bruyn H, Kisch J, Collaert B, Linden U, Nilner K, Dvarsater L. Fixed mandibular restorations on three early-loaded regular platform Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3: 176-184.
28. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994; 11: 3-11.
29. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2: 1127-1131.
30. Felton DA, Cooper LF, Scurria MS. Predictable impression procedures for complete dentures. Dent Clin North Am 1996; 40: 39-51.
31. White GE. Osseointegrated Dental Technology. London:Quintessence, 1993:61.
32. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11-25.
33. Payne AGT, Walton TR, Walton JN, Solomons YF. The outcome of implant overdentures from a prosthodontic perspective:Proposal for a classification protocol. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 27-32.
34. Silva GC, Lopes LR, Landre J Jr. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: A threedimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 239-246.
35. Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Del Fabbro M, Testori T. Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: A multicenter clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 639-644.
36. Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, et al. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: A randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 390-396.
37. Heydecke G, Penrod JR, Takanashi Y, Lund JP, Feine JS, Thomason JM. Cost-effectiveness of mandibular two-implant overdentures and conventional dentures in the edentulous elderly. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 794-799.
38. Feine JS, de Grandmont P, Boudrias P, et al. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses:Choice of prosthesis. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1105-1111.
39. Feine JS, Maskawi K, de Grandmont P, Donohue WB, Tanguay R, Lund JP. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: Evaluation of masticatory function. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1646-1656.
40. de Grandmont P, Feine JS, Tache R, et al. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses:Psychometric evaluation. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1096-1104.
41. Wismeijer D, Van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI, Mulder J, Kalk W. Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26: 263-267.
42. Timmerman R, Stoker GT, Wismeijer D, Oosterveld P, Vermeeren JI, van Waas MA. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 630-633.
43. Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Problems with prostheses on implants:A retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 283-288.
44. Payne AG, Solomons YF. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: A prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 246-253.
45. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, Van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 195-202.
46. Narhi TO, Geertman ME, Hevinga M, Abdo H, Kalk W. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 43-49.
47. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 194-200.